• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上知识交流的编码与分类:#Twitterstorians和AskHistorians社区的比较分析

Coding and Classifying Knowledge Exchange on Social Media: a Comparative Analysis of the #Twitterstorians and AskHistorians Communities.

作者信息

Gruzd Anatoliy, Kumar Priya, Abul-Fottouh Deena, Haythornthwaite Caroline

机构信息

Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B2K3 Canada.

Social Media Lab, Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, 10 Dundas Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5B2G9 Canada.

出版信息

Comput Support Coop Work. 2020;29(6):629-656. doi: 10.1007/s10606-020-09376-y. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10606-020-09376-y
PMID:33343085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7731652/
Abstract

As social media become a staple for knowledge discovery and sharing, questions arise about how self-organizing communities manage learning outside the domain of organized, authority-led institutions. Yet examination of such communities is challenged by the quantity of posts and variety of media now used for learning. This paper addresses the challenges of identifying (1) what information, communication, and discursive practices support successful online communities, (2) whether such practices are similar on Twitter and Reddit, and (3) whether machine learning classifiers can be successfully used to analyze larger datasets of learning exchanges. This paper builds on earlier work that used manual coding of learning and exchange in Reddit 'Ask' communities to derive a coding schema we refer to as 'learning in the wild'. This schema of eight categories: explanation with disagreement, agreement, or neutral presentation; socializing with negative, or positive intent; information seeking; providing resources; and comments about forum rules and norms. To compare across media, results from coding Reddit's AskHistorians are compared to results from coding a sample of #Twitterstorians tweets ( = 594). High agreement between coders affirmed the applicability of the coding schema to this different medium. LIWC lexicon-based text analysis was used to build machine learning classifiers and apply these to code a larger dataset of tweets ( = 69,101). This research shows that the 'learning in the wild' coding schema holds across at least two different platforms, and is partially scalable to study larger online learning communities.

摘要

随着社交媒体成为知识发现和分享的主要方式,关于自组织社区如何在有组织的、由权威主导的机构领域之外进行学习的问题也随之出现。然而,对这类社区的研究受到用于学习的帖子数量和媒体种类的挑战。本文探讨了以下挑战:(1)确定哪些信息、沟通和话语实践支持成功的在线社区;(2)这些实践在推特和红迪网上是否相似;(3)机器学习分类器是否能成功用于分析更大的学习交流数据集。本文基于早期的工作,该工作对红迪网“提问”社区中的学习和交流进行了人工编码,以得出一种我们称为“自然学习”的编码模式。该模式分为八类:带有不同意见、赞同或中立表述的解释;带有消极或积极意图的社交;信息寻求;提供资源;以及关于论坛规则和规范的评论。为了在不同媒体间进行比较,将对红迪网“AskHistorians”的编码结果与对#Twitterstorians推文样本(n = 594)的编码结果进行对比。编码人员之间的高度一致性证实了该编码模式适用于这种不同的媒介。基于LIWC词典的文本分析被用于构建机器学习分类器,并将其应用于对更大的推文数据集(n = 69,101)进行编码。这项研究表明,“自然学习”编码模式至少在两个不同平台上适用,并且在一定程度上可扩展用于研究更大的在线学习社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/3fbe3f6827f0/10606_2020_9376_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/1fe841428696/10606_2020_9376_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/d28244817d08/10606_2020_9376_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/3fbe3f6827f0/10606_2020_9376_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/1fe841428696/10606_2020_9376_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/d28244817d08/10606_2020_9376_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb8/7731652/3fbe3f6827f0/10606_2020_9376_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Coding and Classifying Knowledge Exchange on Social Media: a Comparative Analysis of the #Twitterstorians and AskHistorians Communities.社交媒体上知识交流的编码与分类:#Twitterstorians和AskHistorians社区的比较分析
Comput Support Coop Work. 2020;29(6):629-656. doi: 10.1007/s10606-020-09376-y. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study From Multiple Social Media Platforms.识别电子烟用户生成内容的主题:来自多个社交媒体平台的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5780.
3
"When 'Bad' is 'Good'": Identifying Personal Communication and Sentiment in Drug-Related Tweets.当“负面”即“正面”:识别与毒品相关推文中的个人交流和情感倾向
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Oct 24;2(2):e162. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6327.
4
Exploring Eating Disorder Topics on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.在推特上探索饮食失调话题:机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 30;8(10):e18273. doi: 10.2196/18273.
5
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
6
Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.引出并接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来审视在线社会支持的动态变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3558.
7
Establishing a Link Between Prescription Drug Abuse and Illicit Online Pharmacies: Analysis of Twitter Data.建立处方药滥用与非法在线药房之间的联系:推特数据的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 16;17(12):e280. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5144.
8
A Novel Machine Learning Framework for Comparison of Viral COVID-19-Related Sina Weibo and Twitter Posts: Workflow Development and Content Analysis.一种用于比较病毒性 COVID-19 相关微博和推特帖子的新型机器学习框架:工作流程开发和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):e24889. doi: 10.2196/24889.
9
Multiple social platforms reveal actionable signals for software vulnerability awareness: A study of GitHub, Twitter and Reddit.多个社交平台揭示了软件漏洞意识的可操作信号:对 GitHub、Twitter 和 Reddit 的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 24;15(3):e0230250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230250. eCollection 2020.
10
An ensemble heterogeneous classification methodology for discovering health-related knowledge in social media messages.一种用于在社交媒体消息中发现健康相关知识的集成异构分类方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Jun;49:255-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic mechanisms of knowledge-exchange in a dark-web money laundering forum.暗网洗钱论坛中知识交流的语言机制。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329777. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing mental health signals among sexual and gender minorities using Twitter data.利用推特数据评估性少数群体和性别少数群体中的心理健康信号。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):765-786. doi: 10.1177/1460458219839621. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
2
A Collaborative Approach to Identifying Social Media Markers of Schizophrenia by Employing Machine Learning and Clinical Appraisals.一种通过机器学习和临床评估来识别精神分裂症社交媒体标记物的协作方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 14;19(8):e289. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7956.
3
Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification.
内容分析的可靠性:语义特征规范分类案例。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):1984-2001. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0838-6.
4
Twitter Language Use Reflects Psychological Differences between Democrats and Republicans.推特语言使用反映了民主党人和共和党人之间的心理差异。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0137422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137422. eCollection 2015.
5
Enabling community through social media.通过社交媒体赋能社区。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 31;15(10):e248. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2796.
6
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.自我效能感:迈向行为改变的统一理论
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.