• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of broad consent and related procedures in genomics research: Perspectives from research participants in the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) study in a University Teaching Hospital in Zambia.基因组学研究中广泛同意书及相关程序的使用:赞比亚一家大学教学医院风湿性心脏病遗传学(RHDGen)研究中研究参与者的观点
Glob Bioeth. 2019 Mar 24;31(1):184-199. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592868.
2
"I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.“我通过了测试!” 南非开普敦一项H3Africa基因组研究中人群对照招募方面的诊断错误观念证据。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 15;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z.
3
Evolving perspectives on broad consent for genomics research and biobanking in Africa. Report of the Second H3Africa Ethics Consultation Meeting, 11 May 2015.非洲基因组学研究和生物样本库广泛同意的不断演变的观点。2015年5月11日第二届H3Africa伦理咨询会议报告。
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2016 Jul 25;1:e13. doi: 10.1017/gheg.2016.5. eCollection 2016.
4
Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.在非洲获取基因组学研究的知情同意:对H3Africa同意文件的分析
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):132-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102796. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
5
Informed consent in genomic research and biobanking: taking feedback of findings seriously.基因组研究和生物样本库中的知情同意:认真对待研究结果反馈
Glob Bioeth. 2020 Feb 23;31(1):200-215. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2020.1717896.
6
Ethical considerations for biobanking and use of genomics data in Africa: a narrative review.非洲生物银行和基因组学数据使用的伦理考虑:叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00985-y.
7
Rationale, Design, and the Baseline Characteristics of the RHDGen (The Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease) Network Study†.RHDGen(风湿性心脏病遗传学)网络研究的原理、设计和基线特征†。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023 Feb;16(1):e003641. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003641. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
8
Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities.网络研讨会报告:利益相关者对商业实体使用基因组数据的知情同意的观点。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 14;50(1):57-61. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108650.
9
"It's for a good cause, isn't it?" - Exploring views of South African TB research participants on sample storage and re-use.“这是为了一个好的事业,不是吗?”——探索南非结核病研究参与者对样本存储和再利用的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Jul 25;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-19.
10
Stakeholder views on informed consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa.利益相关者对马拉维和南非未来使用生物样本的知情同意模式的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jan 19;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00882-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Informed consent in genetic and genomic studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of bioethical issues.撒哈拉以南非洲地区基因与基因组研究中的知情同意:生物伦理问题的系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01170-z.
2
Precision health equity for racialized communities.精准健康公平:面向少数族裔群体。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Dec 12;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02049-4.
3
"How about me giving blood for the COVID vaccine and not being able to get vaccinated?" A cognitive interview study on understanding of and agreement with broad consent for future use of data and samples in Colombia and Nicaragua.“要是我去献血用于新冠疫苗研究,却无法接种疫苗,那该怎么办?”一项关于哥伦比亚和尼加拉瓜对未来数据和样本广泛同意使用的理解与认同的认知访谈研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 17;3(5):e0001253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001253. eCollection 2023.
4
Genetic and Genomic Researchers' Perspectives on Biological Sample Sharing in Collaborative Research in Uganda: A Qualitative Study.遗传和基因组研究人员对乌干达合作研究中生物样本共享的看法:一项定性研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):134-146. doi: 10.1177/15562646231171289. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
Rationale, Design, and the Baseline Characteristics of the RHDGen (The Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease) Network Study†.RHDGen(风湿性心脏病遗传学)网络研究的原理、设计和基线特征†。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023 Feb;16(1):e003641. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003641. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
A cervical cancer biorepository for pharmacogenomics research in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦宫颈癌生物样本库用于药物基因组学研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):1320. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10413-w.
7
Perceptions, attitudes, and willingness of the public in low- and middle-income countries of the Arab region to participate in biobank research.阿拉伯中低收入国家公众对参与生物银行研究的看法、态度和意愿。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 1;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00855-z.
8
Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.加强撒哈拉以南非洲与健康相关研究的伦理委员会:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):e062847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062847.
9
Biological sample donation and informed consent for neurobiobanking: Evidence from a community survey in Ghana and Nigeria.生物样本捐赠和神经生物样本库的知情同意:来自加纳和尼日利亚社区调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0267705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267705. eCollection 2022.
10
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.基因组研究中个体研究结果的返还:利益相关者观点的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Rheumatic Heart Disease, 1990-2015.全球、地区和国家风湿性心脏病负担,1990-2015 年。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):713-722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603693.
2
"I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.“我通过了测试!” 南非开普敦一项H3Africa基因组研究中人群对照招募方面的诊断错误观念证据。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 15;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z.
3
Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries.非洲基因组与生物样本库研究的监管:对22个非洲国家伦理准则、政策及程序的内容分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6.
4
Clinical Outcomes in 3343 Children and Adults With Rheumatic Heart Disease From 14 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Two-Year Follow-Up of the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (the REMEDY Study).来自 14 个中低收入国家的 3343 名儿童和成人风湿性心脏病患者的临床结局:全球风湿性心脏病登记研究(REMEDY 研究)的两年随访。
Circulation. 2016 Nov 8;134(19):1456-1466. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024769. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
Broad Consent for Genomic Research and Biobanking: Perspectives from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.基因组研究和生物样本库的广泛同意:低收入和中等收入国家的观点。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:375-93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022456. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.在非洲获取基因组学研究的知情同意:对H3Africa同意文件的分析
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):132-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102796. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
Genomic research in Zambia: confronting the ethics, policy and regulatory frontiers in the 21st Century.赞比亚的基因组研究:直面21世纪的伦理、政策及监管前沿
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Oct 29;13:60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0053-4.
8
Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.生物样本研究的广泛同意:研讨会结论
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):34-42. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162.
9
Involving Research Stakeholders in Developing Policy on Sharing Public Health Research Data in Kenya: Views on Fair Process for Informed Consent, Access Oversight, and Community Engagement.让研究利益相关者参与肯尼亚公共卫生研究数据共享政策的制定:关于知情同意、访问监督和社区参与的公平程序的观点
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):264-77. doi: 10.1177/1556264615592385.
10
Genome-wide association studies in Africans and African Americans: expanding the framework of the genomics of human traits and disease.非洲人和非裔美国人的全基因组关联研究:拓展人类性状与疾病基因组学的框架
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(1):40-51. doi: 10.1159/000367962. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

基因组学研究中广泛同意书及相关程序的使用:赞比亚一家大学教学医院风湿性心脏病遗传学(RHDGen)研究中研究参与者的观点

Use of broad consent and related procedures in genomics research: Perspectives from research participants in the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) study in a University Teaching Hospital in Zambia.

作者信息

Mweemba Oliver, Musuku John, Mayosi Bongani M, Parker Michael, Rutakumwa Rwamahe, Seeley Janet, Tindana Paulina, De Vries Jantina

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Children Hospital, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

Glob Bioeth. 2019 Mar 24;31(1):184-199. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592868.

DOI:10.1080/11287462.2019.1592868
PMID:33343192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7734073/
Abstract

The use of broad consent for genomics research raises important ethical questions for the conduct of genomics research, including relating to its acceptability to research participants and comprehension of difficult scientific concepts. To explore these and other challenges, we conducted a study using qualitative methods with participants enrolled in an H3Africa Rheumatic Heart Disease genomics study (the RHDGen network) in Zambia to explore their views on broad consent, sample and data sharing and secondary use. In-depth interviews were conducted with RHDGen participants ( = 18), study staff ( = 5) and with individuals who refused to participate ( = 3). In general, broad consent was seen to be reasonable if reasons for storing the samples for future research use were disclosed. Some felt that broad consent should be restricted by specifying planned future studies and that secondary research should ideally relate to original disease for which samples were collected. A few participants felt that broad consent would delay the return of research results to participants. This study echoes findings in other similar studies in other parts of the continent that suggested that broad consent could be an acceptable consent model in Africa if careful thought is given to restrictions on re-use.

摘要

基因组学研究中广泛同意的使用给基因组学研究的开展带来了重要的伦理问题,包括其对研究参与者的可接受性以及对复杂科学概念的理解。为了探究这些及其他挑战,我们采用定性方法开展了一项研究,研究对象是参与赞比亚一项H3非洲风湿性心脏病基因组学研究(风湿性心脏病基因组网络)的参与者,以探讨他们对广泛同意、样本和数据共享以及二次使用的看法。我们对风湿性心脏病基因组网络的参与者(18人)、研究人员(5人)以及拒绝参与的个人(3人)进行了深入访谈。总体而言,如果披露了将样本储存用于未来研究的原因,广泛同意被认为是合理的。一些人认为,广泛同意应通过明确规定未来计划开展的研究加以限制,并且二次研究理想情况下应与采集样本所针对的原始疾病相关。少数参与者认为,广泛同意会延迟向参与者反馈研究结果。这项研究与非洲其他地区其他类似研究的结果相呼应,这些研究表明,如果认真考虑对再利用的限制,广泛同意在非洲可能是一种可接受的同意模式。