Kirasirova Luiza, Bulanov Vladimir, Ossadtchi Alexei, Kolsanov Alexander, Pyatin Vasily, Lebedev Mikhail
Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Laboratory of Mathematical Processing of Biological Information, IT Universe Ltd, Samara, Russia.
Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 3;14:604629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.604629. eCollection 2020.
A P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) is a paradigm, where text characters are decoded from event-related potentials (ERPs). In a popular implementation, called P300 speller, a subject looks at a display where characters are flashing and selects one character by attending to it. The selection is recognized as the item with the strongest ERP. The speller performs well when cortical responses to target and non-target stimuli are sufficiently different. Although many strategies have been proposed for improving the BCI spelling, a relatively simple one received insufficient attention in the literature: reduction of the visual field to diminish the contribution from non-target stimuli. Previously, this idea was implemented in a single-stimulus switch that issued an urgent command like stopping a robot. To tackle this approach further, we ran a pilot experiment where ten subjects operated a traditional P300 speller or wore a binocular aperture that confined their sight to the central visual field. As intended, visual field restriction resulted in a replacement of non-target ERPs with EEG rhythms asynchronous to stimulus periodicity. Changes in target ERPs were found in half of the subjects and were individually variable. While classification accuracy was slightly better for the aperture condition (84.3 ± 2.9%, mean ± standard error) than the no-aperture condition (81.0 ± 2.6%), this difference was not statistically significant for the entire sample of subjects ( = 10). For both the aperture and no-aperture conditions, classification accuracy improved over 4 days of training, more so for the aperture condition (from 72.0 ± 6.3% to 87.0 ± 3.9% and from 72.0 ± 5.6% to 97.0 ± 2.2% for the no-aperture and aperture conditions, respectively). Although in this study BCI performance was not substantially altered, we suggest that with further refinement this approach could speed up BCI operations and reduce user fatigue. Additionally, instead of wearing an aperture, non-targets could be removed algorithmically or with a hybrid interface that utilizes an eye tracker. We further discuss how a P300 speller could be improved by taking advantage of the different physiological properties of the central and peripheral vision. Finally, we suggest that the proposed experimental approach could be used in basic research on the mechanisms of visual processing.
P300脑机接口(BCI)是一种从事件相关电位(ERP)中解码文本字符的范式。在一种名为P300拼写器的常见实现方式中,受试者看着字符闪烁的显示屏,并通过注视来选择一个字符。该选择被识别为ERP最强的项目。当皮层对目标和非目标刺激的反应有足够差异时,拼写器表现良好。尽管已经提出了许多改善BCI拼写的策略,但一种相对简单的策略在文献中受到的关注不足:缩小视野以减少非目标刺激的影响。以前,这个想法在一个单刺激开关中得以实现,该开关发出诸如停止机器人之类的紧急命令。为了进一步探讨这种方法,我们进行了一项试点实验,让10名受试者操作传统的P300拼写器或佩戴双目孔径,将他们的视线限制在中央视野。如预期的那样,视野限制导致非目标ERP被与刺激周期性异步的脑电节律所取代。在一半的受试者中发现了目标ERP的变化,且个体差异较大。虽然孔径条件下的分类准确率(84.3±2.9%,平均值±标准误差)略高于无孔径条件(81.0±2.6%),但对于整个受试者样本(n = 10)而言,这种差异没有统计学意义。对于孔径和无孔径条件,经过4天的训练,分类准确率均有所提高,孔径条件下提高得更多(无孔径条件从72.0±6.3%提高到87.0±3.9%,孔径条件从72.0±5.6%提高到97.0±2.2%)。尽管在本研究中BCI性能没有实质性改变,但我们认为通过进一步改进,这种方法可以加快BCI操作并减轻用户疲劳。此外,除了佩戴孔径,非目标可以通过算法去除,或者使用利用眼动追踪器的混合接口。我们进一步讨论了如何利用中央视觉和周边视觉的不同生理特性来改进P300拼写器。最后,我们建议所提出的实验方法可用于视觉处理机制的基础研究。