Esfandiari Maria, Faramarzi Mahbobeh, Gholinia Hemmat, Omidvar Shabnam, Nasiri-Amiri Fatemeh, Abdollahi Somayeh
Counselling Midwifery, Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Department of Psychology, Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):431-436. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_160_19. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
There are no proper tools for measuring pregnancy-specific stress in Iranian population. The aim of this study was psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of Revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (NuPDQ) for the first time in Iranian society.
In a descriptive-analytic study, 269 pregnant women completed the NUPDQ at Obstetrics clinics of Mazanderan Province, Iran. The reliability of the 12-item NuPDQ and 17-item NuPDQ was reevaluated using Cronbach's alpha and internal consistency. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Spielberger state-anxiety Inventory. Moreover, exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the structural factors of the questionnaire.
Factor analysis revealed that the 12-item NuPDQ consisted of four areas in the second trimester including medical and financial problem, physical symptoms, infant health, and parenting with the explained variance of 64.15%. The Persian version of 17-item NuPDQ consisted of 5 areas in the third trimester, including medical and financial problems, physical symptoms, infant health, parenting, and labor and delivery with an explained variance of 61.94%. In addition, interclass correlation coefficient in all 4 areas and overall scale score exceeded 0.90. Finally, the reliability was high based on Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 for 12-item NuPDQ and 0.79 for 17-item NuPDQ.
The Persian version of 12-item NuPDQ in the second trimester and 17-item NuPDQ in the third trimester, as well as all the extracted subscales, had a good validity and reliability for assessing pregnancy-specific stress in Iranian society and can be used in clinical practice.
在伊朗人群中,尚无用于测量孕期特定压力的合适工具。本研究的目的是首次在伊朗社会对修订版产前困扰问卷(NuPDQ)的波斯语版本进行心理测量学评估。
在一项描述性分析研究中,269名孕妇在伊朗马赞德兰省的产科诊所完成了NuPDQ问卷。使用克朗巴哈系数和内部一致性对12项NuPDQ和17项NuPDQ的信度进行了重新评估。使用斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表评估同时效度。此外,采用探索性因素分析来评估问卷的结构因素。
因素分析显示,12项NuPDQ在孕中期由四个领域组成,包括医疗和财务问题、身体症状、婴儿健康以及育儿,解释方差为64.15%。17项NuPDQ的波斯语版本在孕晚期由五个领域组成,包括医疗和财务问题、身体症状、婴儿健康、育儿以及分娩,解释方差为61.94%。此外,所有四个领域的组内相关系数和总体量表得分均超过0.90。最后,基于12项NuPDQ的克朗巴哈系数为0.78,17项NuPDQ的克朗巴哈系数为0.79,信度较高。
孕中期的12项NuPDQ波斯语版本和孕晚期的17项NuPDQ波斯语版本,以及所有提取的子量表,在评估伊朗社会孕期特定压力方面具有良好的效度和信度,可用于临床实践。