Suppr超能文献

杠铃放置位置对深蹲中卡滞区域周围运动学和肌肉激活的影响。

The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats.

作者信息

van den Tillaar Roland, Knutli Tom Roar, Larsen Stian

机构信息

Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Nov 11;2:604177. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.604177. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of barbell placement on kinematics and muscle activity during the sticking region of back squats. Ten healthy medium- to well-trained male powerlifters [age 26.1 ± 11.2 years, body mass 90.2 ± 18.3 kg, height 1.83 ± 0.09 m, five repetition maximum (5RM) 158 ± 29 kg] with at least 3 years of resistance-training experience were recruited. In a single session, participants performed 5RM movements using high bar and low bar squats, where absolute load, descent depth, and stance width were matched between squat conditions. The final repetition was analyzed using 3D kinematics and electromyography (EMG) around the sticking region. No differences in barbell and joint kinematics were observed in any phase, between both barbell modalities. Increased muscle activity in the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, and lower part of the erector spinae with the high bar, when compared with low bar conditions, was recorded. Furthermore, the gluteus maximus and medius had increased muscle activity over the three regions (pre-sticking > sticking > post-sticking), while the erector spinae, soleus, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris experienced decreased muscle activity during the ascending phase. When depth and stance width were matched, the low bar technique was associated with lower erector spinae and quadriceps activity than the high bar technique. Thus, when the goal is to maximally activate knee extensors and the external load is matched, high bar placement would appear preferable.

摘要

本研究调查了杠铃放置位置对深蹲卡滞区域运动学和肌肉活动的影响。招募了10名健康的、中等至良好训练水平的男性力量举运动员[年龄26.1±11.2岁,体重90.2±18.3千克,身高1.83±0.09米,五次重复最大值(5RM)为158±29千克],他们至少有3年的抗阻训练经验。在单个训练 session 中,参与者使用高杠深蹲和低杠深蹲进行5RM动作,其中深蹲条件之间的绝对负荷、下降深度和站立宽度相匹配。使用3D运动学和肌电图(EMG)分析卡滞区域周围的最后一次重复动作。在两种杠铃方式之间,任何阶段均未观察到杠铃和关节运动学的差异。与低杠条件相比,高杠时股直肌、股内侧肌和竖脊肌下部的肌肉活动增加。此外,臀大肌和臀中肌在三个区域(卡滞前>卡滞中>卡滞后)的肌肉活动增加,而竖脊肌、比目鱼肌、股外侧肌和股直肌在上升阶段的肌肉活动减少。当深度和站立宽度相匹配时,低杠技术与比高杠技术时更低的竖脊肌和股四头肌活动相关。因此,当目标是最大程度激活膝关节伸肌且外部负荷相匹配时,高杠放置似乎更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8db/7739732/bb8572f213aa/fspor-02-604177-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验