• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大史密斯机深蹲中黏着区的出现是否是娱乐性抗阻训练男性主动肌的渐弱和协同收缩减少的结果?

Is the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Smith Machine Squats the Result of Diminishing Potentiation and Co-Contraction of the Prime Movers among Recreationally Resistance Trained Males?

机构信息

Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031366.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031366
PMID:33540938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908405/
Abstract

This study compared the kinetics, barbell, and joint kinematics and muscle activation patterns between a one-repetition maximum (1-RM) Smith machine squat and isometric squats performed at 10 different heights from the lowest barbell height. The aim was to investigate if force output is lowest in the sticking region, indicating that this is a poor biomechanical region. Twelve resistance trained males (age: 22 ± 5 years, mass: 83.5 ± 39 kg, height: 1.81 ± 0.20 m) were tested. A repeated two-way analysis of variance showed that Force output decreased in the sticking region for the 1-RM trial, while for the isometric trials, force output was lowest between 0-15 cm from the lowest barbell height, data that support the sticking region is a poor biomechanical region. Almost all muscles showed higher activity at 1-RM compared with isometric attempts ( < 0.05). The quadriceps activity decreased, and the gluteus maximus and shank muscle activity increased with increasing height ( ≤ 0.024). Moreover, the vastus muscles decreased only for the 1-RM trial while remaining stable at the same positions in the isometric trials ( = 0.04), indicating that potentiation occurs. Our findings suggest that a co-contraction between the hip and knee extensors, together with potentiation from the vastus muscles during ascent, creates a poor biomechanical region for force output, and thereby the sticking region among recreationally resistance trained males during 1-RM Smith machine squats.

摘要

本研究比较了 1 次最大重复(1-RM)史密斯机深蹲和在最低杠铃高度下从 10 个不同高度进行的等长深蹲的动力学、杠铃和关节运动学以及肌肉激活模式。目的是研究力输出是否在黏滞区最低,表明这是一个较差的生物力学区域。12 名有抗阻训练经验的男性(年龄:22 ± 5 岁,体重:83.5 ± 39 公斤,身高:1.81 ± 0.20 米)接受了测试。重复双向方差分析显示,在 1-RM 试验中,力输出在黏滞区下降,而在等长试验中,力输出在距最低杠铃高度 0-15 厘米处最低,这表明黏滞区是一个较差的生物力学区域。几乎所有肌肉在 1-RM 时的活动度都高于等长尝试(<0.05)。股四头肌的活动度降低,臀大肌和小腿肌肉的活动度随着高度的增加而增加(≤0.024)。此外,股四头肌仅在 1-RM 试验中减少,而在等长试验中保持在相同位置稳定(=0.04),表明存在易化现象。我们的发现表明,髋关节和膝关节伸肌的共同收缩,以及股四头肌在上升过程中的易化作用,导致力输出的生物力学区域较差,从而导致在进行 1-RM 史密斯机深蹲时,休闲抗阻训练男性的黏滞区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/7c35952ac726/ijerph-18-01366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/a19cad40f530/ijerph-18-01366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/f098a541a5e0/ijerph-18-01366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/2a2b42cf7773/ijerph-18-01366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/7c35952ac726/ijerph-18-01366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/a19cad40f530/ijerph-18-01366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/f098a541a5e0/ijerph-18-01366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/2a2b42cf7773/ijerph-18-01366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e012/7908405/7c35952ac726/ijerph-18-01366-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Smith Machine Squats the Result of Diminishing Potentiation and Co-Contraction of the Prime Movers among Recreationally Resistance Trained Males?最大史密斯机深蹲中黏着区的出现是否是娱乐性抗阻训练男性主动肌的渐弱和协同收缩减少的结果?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031366.
2
Are Diminishing Potentiation and Large Extensor Moments the Cause for the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Free-Weight Barbell Back Squats among Resistance-Trained Males?力量训练男性进行最大自由重量杠铃后深蹲时,力量增强减弱和较大伸展力矩是否是产生卡滞区域的原因?
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):105-119. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185720. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
New Insights About the Sticking Region in Back Squats: An Analysis of Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity.深蹲动作中停滞阶段的新见解:运动学、动力学及肌电活动分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jun 8;3:691459. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.691459. eCollection 2021.
4
Is the occurrence of the sticking region the result of diminishing potentiation in bench press?卧推中黏滞区的出现是否是由于易化作用减弱的结果?
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(6):591-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.658844. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
Fatigue effects upon sticking region and electromyography in a six-repetition maximum bench press.六次最大重复负荷卧推中疲劳对黏着区和肌电图的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(16):1823-30. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.803593. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.不同负荷下自由重量深蹲时肌肉激活和运动学的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0217044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217044. eCollection 2019.
7
A Biomechanical Comparison of the Safety-Bar, High-Bar and Low-Bar Squat around the Sticking Region among Recreationally Resistance-Trained Men and Women.一项针对有规律进行抗阻训练的男性和女性在黏滞点区域的安全杠、高杠和低杠深蹲的生物力学比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168351.
8
Comparison of Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity in the Last Repetition during Different Repetition Maximums in the Bench Press Exercise.不同最大重复次数下卧推练习最后一次重复的运动学和肌电图活动比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114238.
9
Comparison of kinematics and electromyography in the last repetition during different maximum repetition sets in the barbell back squat.不同最大重复次数杠铃深蹲最后一次重复时的运动学和肌电图比较。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 1;12:e16865. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16865. eCollection 2024.
10
Sex differences in intra-set kinematics and electromyography during different maximum repetition sets in the barbell back squat?杠铃深蹲中不同最大重复次数组内运动学和肌电图的性别差异?
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0308344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308344. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative Strength Does Not Influence the Sticking Region Among Recreational Trained Participants in Squat.相对力量并不影响有休闲训练经历的参与者在深蹲时的粘滞区域。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Aug 20;10(3):321. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030321.
2
Are Diminishing Potentiation and Large Extensor Moments the Cause for the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Free-Weight Barbell Back Squats among Resistance-Trained Males?力量训练男性进行最大自由重量杠铃后深蹲时,力量增强减弱和较大伸展力矩是否是产生卡滞区域的原因?
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):105-119. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185720. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats.杠铃放置位置对深蹲中卡滞区域周围运动学和肌肉激活的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Nov 11;2:604177. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.604177. eCollection 2020.
2
Kinematic and EMG Comparison Between Variations of Unilateral Squats Under Different Stabilities.不同稳定性下单侧深蹲变式的运动学与肌电图比较
Sports Med Int Open. 2020 Jul 16;4(2):E59-E66. doi: 10.1055/a-1195-1039. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.
The Effect of Sex and Different Repetition Maximums on Kinematics and Surface Electromyography in the Last Repetition of the Barbell Back Squat.
性别和不同重复最大值对杠铃后深蹲最后一次重复时的运动学和表面肌电图的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Apr 18;9(2):75. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9020075.
4
Associations of maximum and reactive strength indicators with force-velocity profiles obtained from squat jump and countermovement jump.最大力量和反应力量指标与深蹲跳和反向跳获得的力量-速度曲线之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276681. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Stance Width and Barbell Placement on Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity in Back Squats.深蹲时站立宽度和杠铃位置对运动学、动力学和肌电活动的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Sep 1;3:719013. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.719013. eCollection 2021.
6
A Biomechanical Comparison of the Safety-Bar, High-Bar and Low-Bar Squat around the Sticking Region among Recreationally Resistance-Trained Men and Women.一项针对有规律进行抗阻训练的男性和女性在黏滞点区域的安全杠、高杠和低杠深蹲的生物力学比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168351.
7
New Insights About the Sticking Region in Back Squats: An Analysis of Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity.深蹲动作中停滞阶段的新见解:运动学、动力学及肌电活动分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jun 8;3:691459. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.691459. eCollection 2021.
不同负荷下自由重量深蹲时肌肉激活和运动学的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0217044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217044. eCollection 2019.
4
Effect of Descent Velocity upon Muscle Activation and Performance in Two-Legged Free Weight Back Squats.下降速度对双腿自由重量深蹲中肌肉激活及表现的影响。
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jan 7;7(1):15. doi: 10.3390/sports7010015.
5
The Sticking Point in the Bench Press, the Squat, and the Deadlift: Similarities and Differences, and Their Significance for Research and Practice.卧推、深蹲和硬拉的黏滞点:相似性与差异性,及其对研究与实践的意义。
Sports Med. 2017 Apr;47(4):631-640. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0615-9.
6
Comparison of Kinematics and Muscle Activation in Free-Weight Back Squat With and Without Elastic Bands.自由重量深蹲时使用和不使用弹力带的运动学和肌肉激活情况比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):945-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001178.
7
The existence of a sticking region in free weight squats.自由重量深蹲中存在一个停滞区域。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Oct 10;42:63-71. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0061. eCollection 2014 Sep 29.
8
Effect of Fatigue Upon Performance and Electromyographic Activity in 6-RM Bench Press.6 次重复最大负荷卧推中疲劳对运动表现和肌电图活动的影响。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 9;40:57-65. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0007. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.
9
Effect of different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during squat bouts.不同休息间歇对深蹲运动中完成的运动总量的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Dec 1;4(4):361-6. eCollection 2005 Dec.
10
Is the occurrence of the sticking region the result of diminishing potentiation in bench press?卧推中黏滞区的出现是否是由于易化作用减弱的结果?
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(6):591-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.658844. Epub 2012 Feb 3.