Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Dec 21;12(24):24693-24708. doi: 10.18632/aging.202342.
Inequalities in older adults' health rarely consider life-course aspects of socioeconomic status (SES). We examined the association between lifelong SES and old-age health trajectories, and explored the role of lifestyle factors and depressive symptoms in this association. We followed 2760 adults aged 60+ from the Swedish National Study on Care and Aging, Kungsholmen. SES groups were derived using latent class analysis incorporating seven socioeconomic measures spanning childhood, midlife, and late life. We measured health using the Health Assessment Tool, which combines gait speed, cognition, multimorbidity, and disability. Linear mixed models were used to estimate health trajectories. Four SES groups were identified: High (34.9%), Middle (40.2%), Low (21.2%), and Mixed (3.8%). The Mixed group reported greater financial difficulties in childhood and older age, but varying SES attainment in midlife. Baseline health scores indicated that Mixed SES experienced substantial cognitive and physical deficits 12 years earlier than the High SES group. Compared to the High SES group, the Mixed SES group had the fastest health deterioration (β×time=-0.07, 95% CI:-0.11,-0.02); other groups followed a gradient (High>Middle>Low). Lifestyle factors and depressive symptoms attenuated the gradient but did not explain Mixed group's health disadvantage. Life-long SES measures are crucial for understanding older adults' health inequalities.
老年人健康的不平等很少考虑社会经济地位(SES)的生命历程方面。我们研究了终身 SES 与老年健康轨迹之间的关联,并探讨了生活方式因素和抑郁症状在这种关联中的作用。我们跟踪了来自瑞典护理和老龄化全国研究的 2760 名 60 岁以上的成年人,Kungsholmen。SES 组是使用包含儿童期、中年期和老年期七个社会经济措施的潜在类别分析得出的。我们使用健康评估工具衡量健康,该工具结合了步态速度、认知、多种疾病和残疾。线性混合模型用于估计健康轨迹。确定了四个 SES 组:高(34.9%)、中(40.2%)、低(21.2%)和混合(3.8%)。混合 SES 组在儿童期和老年期报告了更大的经济困难,但中年 SES 获得情况不同。基线健康评分表明,混合 SES 在 12 年前经历了相当大的认知和身体缺陷,比高 SES 组早。与高 SES 组相比,混合 SES 组的健康恶化速度最快(β×时间=-0.07,95%CI:-0.11,-0.02);其他组则呈梯度(高>中>低)。生活方式因素和抑郁症状减弱了这种梯度,但无法解释混合组的健康劣势。终身 SES 衡量标准对于理解老年人的健康不平等至关重要。