Suppr超能文献

先发制人如何导致不平等。

How Preemption Can Lead to Inequity.

机构信息

Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement, School of Nursing, George Washington University, 1919 Pennsylvania Ave. #500, Washington, DC 20006, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;19(17):10476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710476.

Abstract

American cities and localities have historically been places of innovation and incubation when it comes to advancing equity and inclusion. Now, local governments in many states are leading the fight for stronger public health protections against COVID-19-through mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, and paid leave provisions, among other actions. However, state lawmakers have long used preemption-state laws that block, override, or limit local ordinances-to stifle local government action, often under pressure from corporate interests and political ideology. Through preemption, state lawmakers have obstructed local communities-often majority-minority communities-from responding to the expressed needs and values of their residents through policies. In this article, we first look at the context behind preemption and its disparate effects. After establishing a conceptual framework for measuring disparities, we discuss how the current COVID-19 pandemic is disproportionately harming the same communities that have been preempted from taking local action, limiting their ability to effectively combat the public health crisis. We argue that all stakeholders interested in health equity have a role to play in addressing the misuse of state preemption.

摘要

美国的城市和地方在推进公平和平等方面一直是创新和孕育的地方。现在,许多州的地方政府正在通过戴口罩令、居家令和带薪休假规定等措施,引领着争取更强有力的公共卫生保护措施以对抗 COVID-19 的斗争。然而,州议员长期以来一直利用先发制人的州法律——这些法律阻止、推翻或限制地方法令——来扼杀地方政府的行动,而这些法律往往是迫于企业利益和政治意识形态的压力。通过先发制人,州议员阻碍了地方社区——通常是少数民族占多数的社区——通过政策来回应居民的明确需求和价值观。在本文中,我们首先探讨了先发制人的背景及其不同的影响。在建立了衡量差异的概念框架之后,我们讨论了当前的 COVID-19 大流行是如何不成比例地伤害那些被先发制人阻止采取地方行动的社区,限制了他们有效应对公共卫生危机的能力。我们认为,所有关心健康公平的利益相关者都可以在解决州先发制人的滥用问题上发挥作用。

相似文献

1
How Preemption Can Lead to Inequity.先发制人如何导致不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;19(17):10476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710476.
4
The Diffusion of Punitive Firearm Preemption Laws Across U.S. States.美国各州惩罚性枪支预先防范法的扩散。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):649-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.023. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验