• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国 COVID-19 大流行期间社会隔离的社会经济差异:观察性研究。

Socioeconomic Disparities in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

Unacast, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e24591. doi: 10.2196/24591.

DOI:10.2196/24591
PMID:33351774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7837167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eliminating disparities in the burden of COVID-19 requires equitable access to control measures across socio-economic groups. Limited research on socio-economic differences in mobility hampers our ability to understand whether inequalities in social distancing are occurring during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess how mobility patterns have varied across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify associations with socioeconomic factors of populations.

METHODS

We used anonymized mobility data from tens of millions of devices to measure the speed and depth of social distancing at the county level in the United States between February and May 2020, the period during which social distancing was widespread in this country. Using linear mixed models, we assessed the associations between social distancing and socioeconomic variables, including the proportion of people in the population below the poverty level, the proportion of Black people, the proportion of essential workers, and the population density.

RESULTS

We found that the speed, depth, and duration of social distancing in the United States are heterogeneous. We particularly show that social distancing is slower and less intense in counties with higher proportions of people below the poverty level and essential workers; in contrast, we show that social distancing is intensely adopted in counties with higher population densities and larger Black populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic inequalities appear to be associated with the levels of adoption of social distancing, potentially resulting in wide-ranging differences in the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in communities across the United States. These inequalities are likely to amplify existing health disparities and must be addressed to ensure the success of ongoing pandemic mitigation efforts.

摘要

背景

消除 COVID-19 负担方面的差异需要在社会经济群体中公平获得控制措施。关于流动性方面的社会经济差异的研究有限,这限制了我们理解在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间是否存在社会隔离不平等的能力。

目的

我们旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间美国各地的流动性模式如何变化,并确定与人口的社会经济因素的关联。

方法

我们使用来自数千万台设备的匿名移动数据,以衡量美国在 2020 年 2 月至 5 月期间的 COVID-19 大流行期间县一级的社交距离的速度和深度,这是该国广泛实施社交距离的时期。使用线性混合模型,我们评估了社会隔离与社会经济变量(包括人口中处于贫困线以下的人数比例、黑人人数比例、基本工人人数比例和人口密度)之间的关联。

结果

我们发现,美国的社交距离速度、深度和持续时间具有异质性。我们特别表明,在贫困人口比例和基本工人比例较高的县,社交距离较慢且强度较低;相比之下,我们表明,在人口密度较高和黑人人口较多的县,社交距离被强烈采用。

结论

社会经济不平等似乎与社会隔离的采用水平相关联,这可能导致 COVID-19 大流行在美国各地社区的影响产生广泛的差异。这些不平等可能会放大现有的健康差异,必须加以解决,以确保正在进行的大流行缓解努力取得成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/9583775229b1/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/951e0893f2d8/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/0f516c025dcd/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/9583775229b1/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/951e0893f2d8/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/0f516c025dcd/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82c/7837167/9583775229b1/jmir_v23i1e24591_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Disparities in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Observational Study.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间社会隔离的社会经济差异:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e24591. doi: 10.2196/24591.
2
Socio-economic disparities in social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情期间社交距离方面的社会经济差异。
medRxiv. 2020 Nov 9:2020.11.07.20201335. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.07.20201335.
3
County-Level Social Distancing and Policy Impact in the United States: A Dynamical Systems Model.县级社会隔离与美国政策影响:动态系统模型。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 23;6(4):e23902. doi: 10.2196/23902.
4
Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature With the Instantaneous Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 in Counties Across the United States.社交距离、人口密度和温度与美国各县 SARS-CoV-2 瞬时繁殖数的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16099.
5
Impact of social distancing on early SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States.社交隔离对美国早期 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Sep;69(6):746-756. doi: 10.1111/zph.12909. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Differential impact of mitigation policies and socioeconomic status on COVID-19 prevalence and social distancing in the United States.缓解政策和社会经济地位对美国 COVID-19 患病率和社会隔离的差异影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11149-1.
7
Disparities in COVID-19 mortality by county racial composition and the role of spring social distancing measures.按县种族构成划分的 COVID-19 死亡率差异及春季社会隔离措施的作用。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100953. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100953. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Social inequalities in protective behaviour uptake at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a national survey.新冠大流行初期保护行为采纳的社会不平等:一项全国性调查的结果。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Oct;112(5):818-830. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00553-0. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Unequal ageing: the quality of life of senior citizens in the EU before and after COVID-19. A multidimensional approach.不平等的老龄化:新冠疫情前后欧盟老年人的生活质量。一种多维度方法。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;13:1506006. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506006. eCollection 2025.
10
Asynchrony Between Individual and Government Actions Accounts for Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Communities.个体和政府行动之间的不同步导致了 COVID-19 对弱势群体社区的不成比例影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of State COVID-19 Responses on People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.美国应对新冠疫情对智力和发育障碍者的影响。
Inclusion (Wash). 2025;13(1):26-39. doi: 10.1352/2326-6988-13.1.26.
2
Mobile Phone Network Data in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review of applications, socioeconomic factors affecting compliance to non-pharmaceutical interventions, privacy implications, and post-pandemic economic recovery strategies.新冠疫情时代的移动电话网络数据:对应用、影响非药物干预措施依从性的社会经济因素、隐私问题及疫情后经济复苏策略的系统综述
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322520. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Are stay-at-home orders more difficult to follow for low-income groups?对低收入群体来说,居家令是否更难遵守?
J Transp Geogr. 2020 Dec;89:102894. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102894. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Evaluating the effect of demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and risk aversion on mobility during the COVID-19 epidemic in France under lockdown: a population-based study.评估在法国封锁期间 COVID-19 疫情下人口因素、社会经济因素和风险规避对流动性的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e638-e649. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30243-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Recognizing Privilege as a Social Determinant of Health During COVID-19.
Characterizing US Spatial Connectivity and Implications for Geographical Disease Dynamics and Metapopulation Modeling: Longitudinal Observational Study.
美国空间连通性特征及其对地理疾病动态和集合种群建模的影响:纵向观察研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 18;11:e64914. doi: 10.2196/64914.
4
Generalized contact matrices allow integrating socioeconomic variables into epidemic models.广义接触矩阵可将社会经济变量纳入传染病模型。
Sci Adv. 2024 Oct 11;10(41):eadk4606. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk4606.
5
Geographic Variations in Human Mobility Patterns during the First Six Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in California.加利福尼亚州新冠疫情头六个月期间人类流动模式的地理差异
Appl Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb;13(4). doi: 10.3390/app13042440. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
The unintended consequences of inconsistent closure policies and mobility restrictions during epidemics.疫情期间封闭政策和流动限制不一致所带来的意外后果。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2023;1(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00028-z. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
7
Characterizing US contact patterns relevant to respiratory transmission from a pandemic to baseline: Analysis of a large cross-sectional survey.描述从大流行到基线与呼吸道传播相关的美国接触模式:一项大型横断面调查分析
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 12:2024.04.26.24306450. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.26.24306450.
8
Morocco's population contact matrices: A crowd dynamics-based approach using aggregated literature data.摩洛哥人口接触矩阵:基于聚集文献数据的人群动力学方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0296740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296740. eCollection 2024.
9
Mental Health Status by Race, Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status among Young Adults in Texas during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间德克萨斯州年轻成年人的心理健康状况与种族、族裔及社会经济地位的关系
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr;12(2):851-864. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-01923-3. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
Prevalence of COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors in US Adults (August-December 2020): Nationwide Household Probability Survey.2020 年 8 月至 12 月美国成年人中 COVID-19 缓解行为的流行情况:全国家庭概率调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Dec 6;9:e37102. doi: 10.2196/37102.
在新冠疫情期间将特权视为健康的社会决定因素
Health Equity. 2020 Aug 27;4(1):1-4. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0038. eCollection 2020.
4
Measuring mobility to monitor travel and physical distancing interventions: a common framework for mobile phone data analysis.衡量流动性以监测出行和物理隔离干预措施:移动电话数据分析的通用框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e622-e628. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30193-X. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Racial, Economic, and Health Inequality and COVID-19 Infection in the United States.美国的种族、经济和健康不平等与 COVID-19 感染。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):732-742. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00833-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: Longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study.社交距离措施减缓美国 COVID-19 疫情:纵向预测试-后测试比较组研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 11;17(8):e1003244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003244. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19.数字技术在应对 COVID-19 中的公共卫生响应。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1183-1192. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income.对 COVID-19 紧急声明的社会隔离反应因收入而有很大差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19658-19660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009412117. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature With the Instantaneous Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 in Counties Across the United States.社交距离、人口密度和温度与美国各县 SARS-CoV-2 瞬时繁殖数的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16099.
10
COVID-19 outbreak response, a dataset to assess mobility changes in Italy following national lockdown.COVID-19 疫情应对,评估意大利全国封锁后流动性变化的数据集。
Sci Data. 2020 Jul 8;7(1):230. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00575-2.