CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School for Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Centre for Marine Socioecology, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Curr Biol. 2020 Dec 21;30(24):R1500-R1510. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.056.
The United Nations General Assembly calls for ecosystem restoration to be a primary intervention strategy used to counter the continued loss of natural habitats worldwide, while supporting human health and wellbeing globally. Restoration of coastal marine ecosystems is perceived by many to be expensive and prone to failure, in part explaining its low rates of implementation compared with terrestrial ecosystems. Yet, marine ecosystem restoration is a relatively new field, and we argue that assessments of its potential to answer this call should not rely on typical outcomes, but also to learn from successful outliers. Here, we review successful restoration efforts across a suite of metrics in coastal marine systems to highlight 'bright spots'. We find that, similar to terrestrial systems, restoration interventions can be effective over large spatial expanses (1,000s-100,000s ha), persist for decades, rapidly expand in size, be cost-effective, and generate social and economic benefits. These bright spots clearly demonstrate restoration of coastal marine systems can be used as a nature-based solution to improve biodiversity and support human health and wellbeing. Examining coastal marine restoration through a historical lens shows that it has developed over a shorter period than restoration in terrestrial systems, partially explaining lower efficiencies. Given these bright spots and the relative immaturity of coastal marine ecosystem restoration, it is likely to advance rapidly over the coming decades and become a common intervention strategy that can reverse marine degradation, contribute to local economies, and improve human wellbeing at a scale relevant to addressing global threats.
联合国大会呼吁将生态系统恢复作为主要干预策略,用于应对全球范围内自然栖息地的持续丧失,同时支持全球人类健康和福祉。许多人认为,恢复沿海海洋生态系统既昂贵又容易失败,这在一定程度上解释了与陆地生态系统相比,其实施率较低的原因。然而,海洋生态系统恢复是一个相对较新的领域,我们认为,评估其应对这一号召的潜力不应仅依赖于典型的结果,还要从成功的异常值中吸取经验教训。在这里,我们回顾了沿海海洋系统中一系列指标上的成功恢复努力,以突出“亮点”。我们发现,与陆地系统类似,恢复干预措施可以在很大的空间范围内(1000 到 10 万公顷以上)有效,持续数十年,迅速扩大规模,具有成本效益,并产生社会效益和经济效益。这些亮点清楚地表明,沿海海洋系统的恢复可以作为一种基于自然的解决方案,以提高生物多样性并支持人类健康和福祉。从历史角度审视沿海海洋恢复,表明它的发展时间比陆地系统的恢复短,这在一定程度上解释了效率较低的原因。鉴于这些亮点和沿海海洋生态系统恢复的相对不成熟,它很可能在未来几十年内迅速发展,并成为一种常见的干预策略,可以扭转海洋退化,为当地经济做出贡献,并改善人类福祉,达到应对全球威胁的规模。