Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Technical and Vocational University, Shiraz, Iran.
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Feb;24(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
The triage and initial care of injured patients and a subsequent right level of care is paramount for an overall outcome after traumatic injury. Early recognition of patients is an important case of such decision-making with risk of worse prognosis. This article is to answer if clinical and paraclinical signs can predict the critical conditions of injured patients after traumatic injury resuscitation.
The study included 1107 trauma patients, 16 years and older. The patients were trauma victims of Levels I and II triage and admitted to the Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz, in 2014-2015. The cross-industry process for data mining methodology and modeling was used for assessing the best early clinical and paraclinical variables to predict the patients' prognosis. Five modeling methods including the support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor algorithms, Bagging and Adaboost, and the neural network were compared by some evaluation criteria.
Learning algorithms can predict the deterioration of injured patients by monitoring the Bagging and SVM models with 99% accuracy. The most-fitted variables were Glasgow Coma Scale score, base deficit, and diastolic blood pressure especially after initial resuscitation in the algorithms for overall outcome predictions.
Data mining could help in triage, initial treatment, and further decision-making for outcome measures in trauma patients. Clinical and paraclinical variables after resuscitation could predict short-term outcomes much better than variables on arrival. With artificial intelligence modeling system, diastolic blood pressure after resuscitation has a greater association with predicting early mortality rather than systolic blood pressure after resuscitation. Artificial intelligence monitoring may have a role in trauma care and should be further investigated.
对创伤患者进行分诊和初步治疗,并为其提供适当的后续治疗,对于创伤后整体预后至关重要。早期识别患者对于此类决策非常重要,因为这关系到预后的好坏。本文旨在探讨临床和辅助检查指标是否能预测创伤后复苏患者的危急情况。
本研究纳入了 2014 年至 2015 年在设拉子 Rajaee(Emtiaz)创伤医院接受 I 级和 II 级分诊的 1107 例 16 岁及以上的创伤患者。采用跨行业数据挖掘方法和建模过程,评估预测患者预后的最佳早期临床和辅助检查变量。通过一些评估标准比较了支持向量机、K 最近邻算法、Bagging 和 Adaboost 以及神经网络等 5 种建模方法。
学习算法可以通过监测 Bagging 和 SVM 模型,以 99%的准确率预测创伤患者的病情恶化。在预测整体预后的算法中,格拉斯哥昏迷评分、基础不足和舒张压等变量在初始复苏后拟合度最高。
数据挖掘有助于创伤患者的分诊、初步治疗和预后评估决策。复苏后临床和辅助检查指标比入院时的指标能更好地预测短期预后。在人工智能模型系统中,舒张压与预测早期死亡率的相关性大于舒张压与预测早期死亡率的相关性。人工智能监测可能在创伤护理中发挥作用,值得进一步研究。