• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习算法预测髋关节镜检查后满意度的临床显著改善。

Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1143-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.027
PMID:33359160
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop machine learning algorithms to predict failure to achieve clinically significant satisfaction after hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

We queried a clinical repository for consecutive primary hip arthroscopy patients treated between January 2012 and January 2017. Five supervised machine learning algorithms were developed in a training set of patients and internally validated in an independent testing set of patients by discrimination, Brier score, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction was derived by an anchor-based method and used as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 935 patients were included, of whom 148 (15.8%) did not achieve the MCID for the VAS satisfaction score at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The best-performing algorithm was the neural network model (C statistic, 0.94; calibration intercept, -0.43; calibration slope, 0.94; and Brier score, 0.050). The 5 most important features to predict failure to achieve the MCID for the VAS satisfaction score were history of anxiety or depression, lateral center-edge angle, preoperative symptom duration exceeding 2 years, presence of 1 or more drug allergies, and Workers' Compensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised machine learning algorithms conferred excellent discrimination and performance for predicting clinically significant satisfaction after hip arthroscopy, although this analysis was performed in a single population of patients. External validation is required to confirm the performance of these algorithms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic case-control study.

摘要

目的

开发机器学习算法以预测髋关节镜检查后无法达到临床显著满意度的情况。

方法

我们对 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月期间连续进行的原发性髋关节镜检查患者的临床资料库进行了查询。在训练集中,我们开发了 5 种监督机器学习算法,并通过区分度、Brier 评分、校准和决策曲线分析在独立的测试集中对其进行内部验证。基于锚定方法得出满意度视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID),并将其作为主要结局。

结果

共纳入 935 例患者,其中 148 例(15.8%)在术后至少 2 年时未达到 VAS 满意度评分的 MCID。表现最佳的算法是神经网络模型(C 统计量为 0.94;校准截距为-0.43;校准斜率为 0.94;Brier 评分为 0.050)。预测 VAS 满意度评分未达到 MCID 的 5 个最重要特征是焦虑或抑郁病史、外侧中心边缘角、术前症状持续时间超过 2 年、存在 1 种或多种药物过敏和工人赔偿。

结论

尽管这是在单一患者群体中进行的分析,但监督机器学习算法在预测髋关节镜检查后临床显著满意度方面具有出色的区分度和性能。需要进行外部验证以确认这些算法的性能。

证据等级

III 级,治疗性病例对照研究。

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy.机器学习算法预测髋关节镜检查后满意度的临床显著改善。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1143-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
2
Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy.基于混合原发性髋关节镜手术人群的临床显著功能改善预测的监督机器学习算法的开发和内部验证。
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1488-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
3
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes.机器学习算法预测髋关节镜治疗运动员髋关节撞击综合征后的功能改善。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 16;103(12):1055-1062. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01640.
4
Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的术前患者因素与临床有意义的结局的相关性:机器学习分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):746-756. doi: 10.1177/03635465211067546. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery.关节镜髋关节保留手术后具有临床意义的功能改善的机器学习算法的外部验证。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3593-3599. doi: 10.1177/03635465221124275. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Prolonged Opioid Use in Opioid-Naïve Primary Hip Arthroscopy Patients.机器学习算法预测初次髋关节镜手术的阿片类药物初治患者的阿片类药物使用时间延长。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 May 25;5(5):e21.00093-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00093.
7
Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery.机器学习在预测关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术后具有临床意义的结果中的应用。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):415-423. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892905. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Development of supervised machine learning algorithms for prediction of satisfaction at 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty.开发监督机器学习算法以预测全肩关节置换术后 2 年的满意度。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):e290-e299. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement for the Patient-Reported Health State After Total Hip Arthroplasty.开发机器学习算法以预测全髋关节置换术后患者报告的健康状态的临床有意义改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2119-2123. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Patient Dissatisfaction After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器学习算法在预测初次全膝关节置换术后患者满意度中的开发。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3117-3122. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.061. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making.关于使用患者报告结局测量信息(PROMs)和机器学习来影响基于价值的临床决策的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03083-8.
2
Machine learning models predicting risk of revision or secondary knee injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate variable discriminatory and accuracy performance: a systematic review.预测前交叉韧带重建术后翻修或二次膝关节损伤风险的机器学习模型显示出不同的鉴别能力和准确性:一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 4;26(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08228-w.
3
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.
预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
4
Several factors predict the achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.对于前交叉韧带重建术后患者报告结局指标而言,有几个因素可预测患者可接受症状状态的达成以及最小临床重要差异:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 May;33(5):1617-1632. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12460. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Artificial Intelligence for Clinically Meaningful Outcome Prediction in Orthopedic Research: Current Applications and Limitations.人工智能在骨科研究中用于具有临床意义的结果预测:当前应用与局限性
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Jun;17(6):185-206. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09893-z. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Predicting Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的预后预测
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Mar;17(3):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09880-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
7
Quantifying Surgeon Intuition Using a Judgment Analysis Model: Surgeon Accuracy of Predicting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Is Moderate at Best.使用判断分析模型量化外科医生的直觉:在接受髋关节镜检查治疗股骨髋臼撞击症的患者中,外科医生预测患者报告结局的准确性充其量处于中等水平。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 9;5(1):e11-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.010. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.基于全国髋关节镜检查注册中心的机器学习修正预测模型的临床应用有限。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2079-2089. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07054-8. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Depression and anxiety are associated with worse baseline function in hip arthroscopy patients.抑郁和焦虑与髋关节镜患者的基线功能较差相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Oct;30(10):3563-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06963-y. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.基于机器学习的全膝关节或髋关节置换术后患者报告结局测量最小临床重要差异能否预测?系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01751-7.