Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
University of Maryland, College Park.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;60(8):998-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
Detentions and suspensions are common practices of school discipline, despite evidence that they are largely ineffective and disproportionately affect children from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds, particularly Black children, and children of lower socioeconomic status. However, few studies have examined suspension and detention rates among race, ethnicity, and family structure (single parent versus secondary caregiver) when controlling for typical behaviors associated with detention and suspension such as externalizing symptoms, age, sex, family income, family education, family conflict, and special education needs.
Caregivers of 11,875 children between ages 9 and 10 years from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study completed a questionnaire assessing their child's demographics, family information, emotions and behaviors, and past-year school discipline history. Data were analyzed with logistic regression, implemented with a generalized estimating equations model.
5.4% of children received a detention or suspension. Controlling for typical predictors of behaviors, Black and multiracial Black children had up to 3.5 times greater odds of receiving a detention or suspension than White children; there were no disciplinary differences for Hispanic or Asian children compared to White children. Children from single-parent households had 1.4 times the odds of receiving detentions or suspensions than children in homes with a secondary caregiver.
Disciplinary actions that can impair typical childhood development, lead to academic failure and dropout, and cause significant emotional and psychological distress disproportionately affect Black children, multiracial Black children, and children from single-parent homes. Racism in elementary school discipline can perpetuate disparities in today's educational system.
尽管有证据表明拘留和停学在很大程度上是无效的,而且不成比例地影响到来自种族和族裔少数背景的儿童,尤其是黑人和社会经济地位较低的儿童,但拘留和停学仍是学校纪律的常见做法。然而,很少有研究在控制与拘留和停学相关的典型行为(如外化症状、年龄、性别、家庭收入、家庭教育、家庭冲突和特殊教育需求)的情况下,根据种族、族裔和家庭结构(单亲与继父/母)检查停学率和拘留率。
来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的 11875 名 9 至 10 岁儿童的照顾者完成了一份问卷,评估他们孩子的人口统计学、家庭信息、情绪和行为以及过去一年的学校纪律史。使用逻辑回归分析数据,实施广义估计方程模型。
5.4%的儿童被拘留或停学。在控制典型行为预测因素的情况下,黑人和多种族黑人儿童接受拘留或停学的可能性是白人儿童的 3.5 倍;与白人儿童相比,西班牙裔或亚裔儿童没有纪律差异。来自单亲家庭的儿童接受拘留或停学的可能性是有继父/母家庭的儿童的 1.4 倍。
会损害典型儿童发展、导致学业失败和辍学,并造成重大情绪和心理困扰的纪律处分措施不成比例地影响黑人和多种族黑人儿童以及来自单亲家庭的儿童。小学纪律中的种族主义可能会使当今教育系统中的差异永久化。