Suppr超能文献

针灸中的安慰剂效应。

Placebo Effects in Acupuncture.

作者信息

Kaptchuk Ted J

机构信息

Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Acupunct. 2020 Dec 1;32(6):352-356. doi: 10.1089/acu.2020.1483. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

This article is a summary of a talk presented in February 2019 at a conference on acupuncture sponsored by the National Institutes of Cancer (NCI) and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) at the National of Institutes of Health (NIH). The article touches on the history of placebos in biomedicine and its absence in traditional East Asian Medicine. It then examines some of the predicaments of evaluating acupuncture's efficacy in relationship to placebo controls. Although acupuncture in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally demonstrate equivalence or even superiority to medical interventions or other nonpharmacologic therapies, acupuncture's ability to show superiority to placebo controls has been inconclusive, contradictory and, at best, modest. This article highlights the efforts of the German health insurance funds to evaluate acupuncture. Using a large meta-analysis, the article summaries acupuncture's effectiveness and efficacy. Subsequently, RCTs and meta-analyses testing the hypothesis that sham acupuncture, and other device placebos, have augmented placebo responses are described. It seems that acupuncture, and devices in general, have enhanced placebo responses. These findings may be relevant to designing and evaluating placebo-control acupuncture RCTs. Research into placebo acupuncture may also be helpful for other conditions where detection of intervention-placebo differences can be problematic. Further research is warranted.

摘要

本文是2019年2月在由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)下属的国立癌症研究所(NCI)和补充与综合健康国家中心(NCCIH)主办的针灸会议上发表的一次演讲的总结。文章探讨了生物医学中安慰剂的历史以及传统东亚医学中不存在安慰剂的情况。接着,文章审视了在与安慰剂对照相关的情况下评估针灸疗效的一些困境。尽管在随机对照试验(RCT)中,针灸通常显示出与医学干预或其他非药物疗法相当甚至更优的效果,但针灸在显示优于安慰剂对照方面的能力尚无定论、相互矛盾,且充其量只是适度的。本文重点介绍了德国医疗保险基金评估针灸的努力。通过一项大型荟萃分析,文章总结了针灸的有效性和功效。随后,描述了检验假针灸及其他器械安慰剂是否增强了安慰剂反应这一假设的随机对照试验和荟萃分析。似乎针灸以及一般的器械都增强了安慰剂反应。这些发现可能与设计和评估安慰剂对照的针灸随机对照试验相关。对安慰剂针灸的研究可能对其他难以检测干预与安慰剂差异的病症也有帮助。有必要进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Placebo Effects in Acupuncture.针灸中的安慰剂效应。
Med Acupunct. 2020 Dec 1;32(6):352-356. doi: 10.1089/acu.2020.1483. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
The status and future of acupuncture clinical research.针灸临床研究的现状与未来。
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Sep;14(7):871-81. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.SAR-4.

引用本文的文献

2
The Anatomical and Physiological Knowledge of the Authors: Why It Matters.作者的解剖学和生理学知识:为何重要。
Med Acupunct. 2024 Dec 17;36(6):312-322. doi: 10.1089/acu.2024.0016. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
An integrative approach to dementia care.痴呆症护理的综合方法。
Front Aging. 2023 Feb 16;4:1143408. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1143408. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验