Takahashi Shinji, Grove Philip M
Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tohoku Gakuin University, Sendai, Japan.
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 7;11:614038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614038. eCollection 2020.
In sports psychology research, the Stroop test and its derivations are commonly used to investigate the benefits of exercise on cognitive function. The measures of the Stroop test and the computed interference often have different interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). However, the ICC is never reported in cross-over designs involving multiple variances associated with individual differences. We investigated the ICC of the Stroop neutral and incongruent tests and interference (neutral test-incongruent test), and reverse Stroop task using the linear mixed model. Forty-eight young adults participated in a cross-over design experiment composed of 2 factors: exercise mode (walking, resistance exercise, badminton, and seated rest as control) and time (pre- and post-tests). Before and after each intervention, participants completed the Stroop neutral and incongruent, and the reverse-Stroop neutral and incongruent tests. We analyzed for each test performance and interference and calculated ICC using the linear mixed model. The linear mixed model found a significant interaction of exercise mode and time for both the Stroop and reverse-Stroop tasks, suggesting that exercise mode influences the effect of acute exercise on inhibitory function. On the other hand, there was no significant effect of exercise mode for both the Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference. The results also revealed that calculating both the Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference resulted in smaller ICCs than the ICCs of the neutral and incongruent tests for both the Stroop and reverse-Stroop tasks. The Stroop and reverse-Stroop interferences are known as valid measures of the inhibitory function for cross-sectional research design. However, to understand the benefits of acute exercise on inhibitory function comprehensively by cross-over design, comparing the incongruent test with the neutral test also seems superior because these tests have high reliability and statistical power.
在运动心理学研究中,Stroop测试及其衍生测试通常用于研究运动对认知功能的益处。Stroop测试的测量指标和计算出的干扰通常具有不同的组内相关系数(ICC)。然而,在涉及与个体差异相关的多个方差的交叉设计中,从未报告过ICC。我们使用线性混合模型研究了Stroop中性和不一致性测试以及干扰(中性测试 - 不一致性测试)和反向Stroop任务的ICC。48名年轻人参与了一项由两个因素组成的交叉设计实验:运动模式(步行、阻力运动、羽毛球和作为对照的静坐休息)和时间(测试前和测试后)。在每次干预前后,参与者完成Stroop中性和不一致性测试,以及反向Stroop中性和不一致性测试。我们分析了每项测试的表现和干扰,并使用线性混合模型计算ICC。线性混合模型发现,对于Stroop和反向Stroop任务,运动模式和时间之间存在显著的交互作用,这表明运动模式会影响急性运动对抑制功能的效果。另一方面,对于Stroop和反向Stroop干扰,运动模式没有显著影响。结果还表明,计算Stroop和反向Stroop干扰得出的ICC比Stroop和反向Stroop任务的中性和不一致性测试的ICC小。Stroop和反向Stroop干扰是横断面研究设计中抑制功能的有效测量指标。然而,为了通过交叉设计全面了解急性运动对抑制功能的益处,将不一致性测试与中性测试进行比较似乎也更具优势,因为这些测试具有较高的可靠性和统计效力。