Segal K R, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald P I, Hodgdon J A, Van Itallie T B
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Jan;47(1):7-14. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.1.7.
This study validated further the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method for body composition estimation. At four laboratories densitometrically-determined lean body mass (LBMd) was compared with BIA in 1567 adults (1069 men, 498 women) aged 17-62 y and with 3-56% body fat. Equations for predicting LBMd from resistance measured by BIA, height, weight, and age were obtained for the men and women. Application of each equation to the data from the other labs yielded small reductions in R values and small increases in SEEs. Some regression coefficients differed among labs but these differences were eliminated after adjustment for differences among labs in the subjects' body fatness. All data were pooled to derive fatness-specific equations for predicting LBMd: the resulting R values ranged from 0.907 to 0.952 with SEEs of 1.97-3.03 kg. These results confirm the validity of BIA and indicate that the precision of predicting LBM from impedance can be enhanced by sex- and fatness-specific equations.
本研究进一步验证了生物电阻抗分析(BIA)法用于估计身体成分的有效性。在四个实验室中,对1567名年龄在17至62岁、体脂率为3%至56%的成年人(1069名男性,498名女性)进行了比较,将通过密度测定法确定的瘦体重(LBMd)与BIA结果进行对比。得出了根据BIA测量的电阻、身高、体重和年龄预测男性和女性LBMd的方程。将每个方程应用于其他实验室的数据时,R值略有降低,标准估计误差(SEE)略有增加。各实验室之间的一些回归系数存在差异,但在对受试者体脂率在各实验室之间的差异进行调整后,这些差异被消除。汇总所有数据以得出针对不同体脂率的预测LBMd的方程:得出的R值范围为0.907至0.952,SEE为1.97至3.03千克。这些结果证实了BIA的有效性,并表明通过性别和体脂率特异性方程可以提高从阻抗预测LBM的精度。