• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查在不同肺癌风险人群中的应用。

LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000455.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000455
PMID:33371010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7011883/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The improvement of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening selection criteria could help to include more individuals who have lung cancer, or in whom lung cancer will develop, while avoiding significant cost increase. We evaluated baseline results of LDCT lung cancer screening in a population with a heterogeneous risk profile for lung cancer.

METHODS

LDCT lung cancer screening was implemented alongside a preventive health programme in a private hospital in Brazil. Individuals older than 45 years, smokers and former smokers, regardless of tobacco exposure, were included. Patients were classified according to the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) eligibility criteria and to PLCO 6-year lung cancer risk. Patient characteristics, CT positivity rate, detection rate of lung cancer and false-positive rate were assessed.

RESULTS

LDCT scans of 472 patients were evaluated and three lung adenocarcinomas were diagnosed. CT positivity rate (Lung-RADS 3/4) was significantly higher (p=0.019) in the NLST group (10.1% (95% CI, 5.9% to 16.9%)) than in the non-NLST group (3.6% (95% CI, 2.62% to 4.83%)) and in the PLCO high-risk group (14.3% (95% CI, 6.8% to 27.7%)) than in the PLCO low-risk group (3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.8%)) (p=0.016). Detection rate of lung cancer was also significantly higher (p=0.018) among PLCO high-risk patients (5.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 12.6%)) than in the PLCO low-risk individuals (0.2% (95% CI, 0.1% to 1.1%)). The false-positive rate for NLST criteria (16.4% (95% CI, 13.2% to 20.1%)) was higher (p<0.001) than for PLCO criteria (7.6 (95% CI, 5.3% to 10.5%)).

DISCUSSION

Our study indicates a lower performance when screening low-risk individuals in comparison to screening patients meeting NLST criteria and PLCO high-risk patients. Also, incorporating PLCO 6-year lung cancer risk ≥0.0151 as an eligibility criterion seems to increase lung cancer screening effectiveness.

摘要

简介

提高低剂量 CT(LDCT)肺癌筛查选择标准有助于纳入更多患有肺癌或即将患上肺癌的个体,同时避免成本显著增加。我们评估了在肺癌风险异质人群中进行 LDCT 肺癌筛查的基线结果。

方法

LDCT 肺癌筛查与巴西一家私立医院的预防保健计划同时进行。纳入标准为年龄大于 45 岁、吸烟者和曾经吸烟者,无论其吸烟暴露情况如何。根据美国国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)入选标准和 PLCO6 年肺癌风险对患者进行分类。评估患者特征、CT 阳性率、肺癌检出率和假阳性率。

结果

评估了 472 例 LDCT 扫描,诊断出 3 例肺腺癌。NLST 组 CT 阳性率(Lung-RADS3/4)显著高于非 NLST 组(10.1%(95%CI,5.9%至 16.9%))(p=0.019)和 PLCO 高风险组(14.3%(95%CI,6.8%至 27.7%))(p=0.016),高于 3.6%(95%CI,2.62%至 4.83%)和 3.7%(95%CI,2.9%至 4.8%)(p=0.016)。PLCO 高风险患者的肺癌检出率(5.7%(95%CI,2.5%至 12.6%))也显著高于 PLCO 低风险患者(0.2%(95%CI,0.1%至 1.1%))(p=0.018)。NLST 标准的假阳性率(16.4%(95%CI,13.2%至 20.1%))高于 PLCO 标准(7.6%(95%CI,5.3%至 10.5%))(p<0.001)。

讨论

与筛查符合 NLST 标准和 PLCO 高风险患者相比,我们的研究表明对低危个体进行筛查的性能较低。此外,将 PLCO6 年肺癌风险≥0.0151 纳入入选标准似乎可以提高肺癌筛查的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f78/7011883/c43fa002774c/bmjresp-2019-000455f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f78/7011883/c43fa002774c/bmjresp-2019-000455f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f78/7011883/c43fa002774c/bmjresp-2019-000455f01.jpg

相似文献

1
LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查在不同肺癌风险人群中的应用。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000455.
2
Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO and LLP) performance in a community-based lung cancer screening programme.基于社区的肺癌筛查项目中肺癌风险模型(PLCO 和 LLP)性能分析。
Thorax. 2020 Aug;75(8):661-668. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214626. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
4
Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.多变量肺癌风险预测模型的建立与验证,该模型包含低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查结果:国家肺癌筛查试验数据的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204.
5
Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment.国家肺癌筛查试验中Lung-RADS的表现:一项回顾性评估
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):485-91. doi: 10.7326/M14-2086.
6
OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.OWL:一种基于英国生物银行、PLCO 和 NLST 人群的肺癌筛查的优化和独立验证的机器学习预测模型。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
7
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.肺结节体积在 Lung-RADS v1.1 中的肺癌筛查:阴性基线 CT 可能增加筛查间隔。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1956-1968. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07275-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Performance of Risk Factor-Based Guidelines and Model-Based Chest CT Lung Cancer Screening in World Trade Center-Exposed Fire Department Rescue/Recovery Workers.基于风险因素的指南和基于模型的胸部CT肺癌筛查在世贸中心暴露的消防救援/恢复工作人员中的表现
Chest. 2021 May;159(5):2060-2071. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.

引用本文的文献

1
National Survey of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility in United States Veterans.美国退伍军人肺癌筛查资格全国调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 May;68(5):886-895. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Lung cancer screening provider recommendation and completion in black and White patients with a smoking history in two healthcare systems: a survey study.在两个医疗保健系统中,有吸烟史的黑人和白人患者的肺癌筛查提供者推荐和完成情况:一项调查研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 7;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02452-y.
3
Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.多变量肺癌风险预测模型的建立与验证,该模型包含低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查结果:国家肺癌筛查试验数据的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204.
2
Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.九种风险预测模型对选择持续吸烟者进行计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):10-19. doi: 10.7326/M17-2701. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
巴西肺癌筛查:巴西胸外科学会、巴西胸科协会和巴西放射学和诊断影像学学院的建议。
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Mar 22;50(1):e20230233. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230233. eCollection 2024.
4
Performance of Lung-RADS in different target populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肺-放射学报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS)在不同目标人群中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar;34(3):1877-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10049-9. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
5
Implementation of an Integrated Lung Cancer Prevention and Screening Program Using a Mobile Computed Tomography (CT) Unit in Brazil.利用移动计算机断层扫描(CT)设备在巴西实施肺癌综合预防和筛查计划。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121385. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121385.
6
Recalibrating Risk Prediction Models by Synthesizing Data Sources: Adapting the Lung Cancer PLCO Model for Taiwan.重新校准风险预测模型的综合数据源:适应台湾的肺癌 PLCO 模型。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Dec 5;31(12):2208-2218. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0281.
7
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
A modeling analysis to compare eligibility strategies for lung cancer screening in Brazil.一项比较巴西肺癌筛查资格策略的建模分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Nov 1;42:101176. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101176. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based 'Lung Health Check' pilot in deprived areas of Manchester.
实施肺癌筛查:曼彻斯特贫困地区社区“肺部健康检查”试点的基线结果。
Thorax. 2019 Apr;74(4):405-409. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211377. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.风险导向型肺癌筛查:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 6;168(3):161-169. doi: 10.7326/M17-1401. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
5
Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.采用风险模型进行肺癌筛查的研究对象选择(泛加拿大肺癌早期检测[PanCan]研究):一项单臂前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30597-1. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Should Nonsmokers Be Excluded from Early Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography? Community-Based Practice in Shanghai.非吸烟者是否应被排除在低剂量螺旋计算机断层扫描早期肺癌筛查之外?上海的社区实践。
Transl Oncol. 2017 Aug;10(4):485-490. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.用于选择肺癌筛查候选者的风险预测模型:一项回顾性验证研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 4;14(4):e1002277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277. eCollection 2017 Apr.
8
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Final screening round of the NELSON lung cancer screening trial: the effect of a 2.5-year screening interval.NELSON 肺癌筛查试验的最终筛查轮次:2.5 年筛查间隔的影响。
Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):48-56. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208655. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
10
UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening.英国肺癌随机对照试验试点筛查试验:筛查组的基线结果为肺癌筛查的潜在实施提供了证据。
Thorax. 2016 Feb;71(2):161-70. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207140. Epub 2015 Dec 8.