Suppr超能文献

男性型脱发病例中单纯微针治疗与微针联合富血小板血浆治疗的皮肤镜评估:一项头部对照比较研究。

Dermoscopic Assessment of Microneedling Alone versus Microneedling with Platelet-Rich Plasma in Cases of Male Pattern Alopecia: A Split-Head Comparative Study.

作者信息

Aggarwal Kartikay, Gupta Sanjeev, Jangra Ravi Shankar, Mahendra Aneet, Yadav Anuradha, Sharma Aastha

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Sun Skin Clinic, Ambala, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Int J Trichology. 2020 Jul-Aug;12(4):156-163. doi: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_64_20. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Male pattern alopecia (MPA) is a common disorder hugely impacting the quality of life of affected individuals. The meager number of options available for treatment has their own limitations. Novel therapies are continuously being researched for.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study included thirty male patients with Hamilton Grade II to Grade V. All patients received four sequential treatments with microneedling (MN) on one half of the scalp and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with MN (MN + PRP) on the other half for 4 months. Three months following the last session, evaluation was done from the vertex and temporal sites in both the groups by dermoscopic microphotographs by a blinded evaluator. In addition, the patients were asked about their satisfaction score on the basis of treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Overall hair thickness showed significant increase in both MN and MN + PRP group. Furthermore, the increase in thickness was almost double in the MN group as compared to MN + PRP group (0.006 and 0.003 mm, respectively). Overall hair density also increased significantly in both the study groups but more in MN + PRP group (14.6 hair/cm) than the MN group (10.8 hair/cm). However, the difference between the results of both the groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first split scalp study for MPA. We conclude that MN and PRP are both effective in treatment of androgenetic alopecia and improve the hair parameters and patient satisfaction. However, no additional effect of PRP over MN was observed. Both these therapies are safe and well tolerated without any major side effects. Limitations of our study were small sample size and lack of long-term follow-up.

摘要

引言

男性型脱发(MPA)是一种常见疾病,对受影响个体的生活质量有重大影响。现有的治疗选择有限且都有其自身的局限性。人们一直在不断研究新的治疗方法。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了30例汉密尔顿分级为II级至V级的男性患者。所有患者在头皮的一半接受微针(MN)连续四次治疗,另一半接受微针联合富血小板血浆(PRP)(MN + PRP)治疗,为期4个月。最后一次治疗后3个月,由一位不知情的评估者通过皮肤镜显微照片对两组患者的头顶和颞部区域进行评估。此外,还询问患者基于治疗结果的满意度评分。

结果

MN组和MN + PRP组的总体毛发厚度均显著增加。此外,MN组的厚度增加几乎是MN + PRP组的两倍(分别为0.006毫米和0.003毫米)。两个研究组的总体毛发密度也均显著增加,但MN + PRP组(14.6根/平方厘米)比MN组(10.8根/平方厘米)增加得更多。然而,两组结果之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项针对MPA的头皮分区研究。我们得出结论,MN和PRP在治疗雄激素性脱发方面均有效,可改善毛发参数并提高患者满意度。然而,未观察到PRP相对于MN有额外效果。这两种治疗方法都安全且耐受性良好,无任何重大副作用。我们研究的局限性在于样本量小且缺乏长期随访。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验