Fukuda Kentaro, Kuwano Atsutoshi, Kuroda Taisuke, Tamura Norihisa, Mita Hiroshi, Okada Yuji, Kasashima Yoshinori
Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tochigi 329-0412, Japan.
Racehorse Clinic, Miho Training Center, Japan Racing Association, Ibaraki 300-0493, Japan.
J Equine Sci. 2020;31(4):105-111. doi: 10.1294/jes.31.105. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
This study optimized the double-spin conditions for preparing equine platelet-rich plasma (PRP): leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (P-PRP). Whole blood samples were centrifuged at various double-spin conditions. Both L-PRP and P-PRP were prepared at each stage, and complete blood counts and growth factor concentrations were compared. Samples centrifuged at 160 × 900 g, 160 × 2,000 g, and 400 × 2,000 g exhibited the highest platelet counts. P-PRP had significantly lower leukocyte and erythrocyte contents than L-PRP, especially at 400 × 2,000 g. No significant differences were observed in growth factor concentrations. Our data suggest that optimum L-PRP preparation should include centrifugation under the aforementioned conditions, whereas centrifugation at 400 × 2,000 g is optimal for P-PRP.
本研究优化了制备马富血小板血浆(PRP)的双离心条件:富白细胞PRP(L-PRP)和贫白细胞PRP(P-PRP)。全血样本在不同的双离心条件下进行离心。在每个阶段都制备了L-PRP和P-PRP,并比较了全血细胞计数和生长因子浓度。在160×900g、160×2000g和400×2000g条件下离心的样本血小板计数最高。P-PRP的白细胞和红细胞含量显著低于L-PRP,尤其是在400×2000g条件下。生长因子浓度未观察到显著差异。我们的数据表明,最佳的L-PRP制备应包括在上述条件下离心,而400×2000g离心对P-PRP是最佳的。