Suppr超能文献

预测 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡率和主要心血管并发症:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究结局模型版本 2 在两个欧洲观察性队列中的外部验证。

Prediction of mortality and major cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: External validation of UK Prospective Diabetes Study outcomes model version 2 in two European observational cohorts.

机构信息

Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 May;23(5):1084-1091. doi: 10.1111/dom.14311. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

AIM

To externally validate the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model version 2 (UKPDS-OM2) by comparing the predicted and observed outcomes in two European population-based cohorts of people with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used data from the Casale Monferrato Survey (CMS; n = 1931) and a subgroup of the Hoorn Diabetes Care System (DCS) cohort (n = 5188). The following outcomes were analysed: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Model performance was assessed by comparing predictions with observed cumulative incidences in each cohort during follow-up.

RESULTS

All-cause mortality was overestimated by the UKPDS-OM2 in both the cohorts, with a bias of 0.05 in the CMS and 0.12 in the DCS at 10 years of follow-up. For MI, predictions were consistently higher than observed incidence over the entire follow-up in both cohorts (10 years bias 0.07 for CMS and 0.10 for DCS). The model performed well for stroke and IHD outcomes in both cohorts. CHF incidence was predicted well for the DCS (5 years bias -0.001), but underestimated for the CMS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The UKPDS-OM2 consistently overpredicted the risk of mortality and MI in both cohorts during follow-up. Period effects may partially explain the differences. Results indicate that transferability is not satisfactory for all outcomes, and new or adjusted risk equations may be needed before applying the model to the Italian or Dutch settings.

摘要

目的

通过比较两种基于人群的 2 型糖尿病患者的预测和观察结果,对英国前瞻性糖尿病研究结果模型 2 版(UKPDS-OM2)进行外部验证。

材料与方法

我们使用了来自卡萨尔蒙费拉托调查(CMS;n=1931)和霍恩糖尿病护理系统(DCS)队列的一个亚组(n=5188)的数据。分析了以下结局:全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)、缺血性心脏病(IHD)、卒中和充血性心力衰竭(CHF)。通过比较每个队列在随访期间的预测与观察到的累积发生率,评估模型性能。

结果

UKPDS-OM2 在两个队列中均高估了全因死亡率,CMS 队列中 10 年随访时的偏差为 0.05,DCS 队列中为 0.12。对于 MI,在两个队列的整个随访期间,预测值始终高于观察到的发病率(CMS 队列的 10 年偏差为 0.07,DCS 队列为 0.10)。该模型在两个队列的卒中和 IHD 结局方面表现良好。对于 DCS 队列的 CHF 发生率预测良好(5 年偏差-0.001),但 CMS 队列则低估。

结论

UKPDS-OM2 在随访期间始终高估了两个队列的死亡率和 MI 风险。时期效应可能部分解释了这些差异。结果表明,该模型在所有结局方面的可转移性并不令人满意,在将模型应用于意大利或荷兰环境之前,可能需要新的或调整后的风险方程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验