Suppr超能文献

丧亲治疗差距:(在线)创伤性丧失后的丧亲支持需求和使用情况。

Treatment gap in bereavement care: (Online) bereavement support needs and use after traumatic loss.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Jul;28(4):907-916. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2544. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

People bereaved through road traffic accidents (RTAs) are at risk for severe and disabling grief (i.e., pathological grief). Knowledge about needs and use of bereavement care, including psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and support groups, is limited. This study charted (correlates of) the needs and use of bereavement care in RTA bereaved people. Furthermore, although online grief treatment seems effective, it is unknown whether it is perceived as acceptable. Accordingly, we examined the acceptability of online treatment. Dutch RTA bereaved adults (N = 273) completed self-report measures about needs and use of bereavement care, acceptability of online grief treatment, and pathological grief. Regression analyses were used to identify correlates of care needs and use and acceptability of online treatment. The majority (63%) had received help from psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and/or support groups. One in five participants had not used bereavement care services, despite reporting elevated pathological grief levels and/or expressing a need for care, pointing to a treatment gap. Use of psychological support before the loss was the strongest predictor of bereavement care needs and use following the loss. A minority (35%) reported being inclined to use online grief treatment if in need of support. More openness towards online services was related to greater acceptability of online treatment. In conclusion, 20% of RTA bereaved people with pathological grief or care needs had not received care. This treatment gap may be reduced by improving accessibility of online treatments. However, as only 35% was open to using online treatments, increasing the acceptability of (online) treatments appears important.

摘要

道路交通事故(RTA)导致的丧亲者可能会经历严重和致残的悲伤(即病理性悲伤)。关于丧亲护理的需求和使用的知识,包括心理治疗、药物治疗和支持小组,是有限的。本研究描述了(相关因素)RTA 丧亲者的丧亲护理需求和使用情况。此外,虽然在线悲伤治疗似乎有效,但尚不清楚它是否被认为是可以接受的。因此,我们研究了在线治疗的可接受性。荷兰 RTA 丧亲的成年人(N=273)完成了关于丧亲护理需求和使用、在线悲伤治疗的可接受性以及病理性悲伤的自我报告量表。回归分析用于确定护理需求和使用以及在线治疗可接受性的相关因素。大多数(63%)人接受过心理治疗、药物治疗和/或支持小组的帮助。尽管有五分之一的参与者报告病理性悲伤水平升高和/或表示需要护理,但仍有五分之一的参与者没有使用丧亲护理服务,这表明存在治疗差距。失去亲人前使用心理支持是丧亲护理需求和使用的最强预测因素。少数人(35%)表示,如果需要支持,他们愿意使用在线悲伤治疗。对在线服务的开放性越大,对在线治疗的可接受性就越高。总之,20%有病理性悲伤或护理需求的 RTA 丧亲者没有接受护理。通过提高在线治疗的可及性,可能会减少这种治疗差距。然而,由于只有 35%的人愿意使用在线治疗,因此提高(在线)治疗的可接受性似乎很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2c/8451936/8a45535b7c95/CPP-28-907-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验