Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Rome G. Marconi, Rome, Italy.
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jan;34(1):e14724. doi: 10.1111/dth.14724. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Retinoids and antibiotics topical treatments are commonly used as first line therapy in mild to moderate acne. However, irritant contact dermatitis is a common side effect of topical retinoids. A strategy to increase local tolerability is the "short contact therapy" (SCT) approach, consisting in the application of the product with the complete removal after 30 to 60 minutes using a non-aggressive cleanser. A gel containing tretinoin 0.02%, clindamycin 0.8%, and glycolic acid 4% in polyvinyl alcohol (MP-gel) has shown to be effective as monotherapy in mild to moderate acne with a tolerability profile similar to other topical retinoids. So far, no trials have been performed with this gel comparing the tolerability profile of SCT with standard application therapy (SAT). We conducted a 2-center randomized parallel groups, controlled, assessor-blinded study, comparing MP-gel applied as SCT in comparison with MP-gel used as SAT (The "MASCOTTE" trial). Forty-six subjects (nine men and 37 women, mean age 23 ± 4 years, range 18-31 years) with mild-to-moderate acne were enrolled, after their written informed consent in a randomized, parallel groups controlled, assessor-blinded 8-week trial. Twenty-three were assigned to MP-gel once daily (evening application) using the SCT approach (ie, complete removal of product after 1 hour using a gentle cleanser), and 23 were randomized to the SAT approach with the same gel. The primary endpoint was the evolution of the tolerability score (TS) assessed evaluating four items: erythema, dryness, stinging, and burning, using a 4-point score scale (from 0: no symptom to 3: severe symptom). Secondary endpoints were the evolution of global acne grading system (GAGS) score (range: from 0 to >39) and the investigator global assessment (IGA of acne severity) score (range from 0 to 4). TS was evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. GAGS and IGA scores were evaluated at baseline and at week eight. At week eight, an efficacy global score (EGS) (from 1: no efficacy to 4: very good efficacy) and a tolerability global score (TGS) (from 1: very low tolerability to 3: very good tolerability) evaluation were also done. All the evaluations were performed by an investigator unaware of treatment groups allocation (SCT or SAT). Thirty-eight subjects (83%) completed the 8-week treatment period. Eight subjects (two in the SCT group and six in the SAT group) dropped out prematurely due to low skin tolerability. In the SCT the TS at week two was 1.3 ± 1.7, in the SAT group TS was significantly higher (3.1 ± 1.7) (P = .028). TS was significantly lower in SCT group vs SAT also at weeks four and eight (P = .01; ANOVA test). The GAGS score at baseline was 19 ± 7 in the SCT group and 23 ± 4 in the SAT group (NS). At week 8 the GAGS score in SCT was significantly reduced to 8.5 ± 2.8 (-55%) (P = .001 vs baseline) and was also significantly lower in comparison with SAT group (8.5 vs 15; P = .0054). The IGA scores at baseline were 1.9 ± 0.6 in SCT and 2.4 ± 0.7 in SAT group. At week eight, in comparison with baseline values IGA score was reduced significantly by 48% in SCT and by 30% in SAT. EGS and TGS were significantly higher (better clinical efficacy and better tolerability) in SCT in comparison with SAT (3.6 ± 0.5 and 2.9 ± 0.3 vs 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.7; respectively). This tretinoin, clindamycin, glycolic acid gel, applied as SCT, has shown a better skin tolerability and at least a comparable clinical efficacy in comparison with the standard application modality in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne. The SCT therefore could be an effective treatment strategy which could improve subjects' compliance and adherence.
视黄醇和抗生素局部治疗通常是轻度至中度痤疮的一线治疗方法。然而,局部视黄醇的常见副作用是刺激性接触性皮炎。一种增加局部耐受性的策略是“短接触疗法”(SCT),包括在 30 至 60 分钟后使用非刺激性清洁剂完全去除产品。一种含有 0.02%维甲酸、0.8%克林霉素和 4%聚乙二醇的凝胶(MP-凝胶)在治疗轻度至中度痤疮方面表现出与其他局部视黄醇相似的疗效,并且耐受性良好。到目前为止,尚未有试验比较 SCT 与标准应用疗法(SAT)在这种凝胶中的耐受性。我们进行了一项为期 8 周的、随机、平行分组、对照、评估者盲法研究,比较了 SCT 中 MP-凝胶的应用与 SAT 中 MP-凝胶的应用(“MASCOTTE”试验)。46 名受试者(9 名男性和 37 名女性,平均年龄 23±4 岁,范围 18-31 岁)签署了书面知情同意书后,被纳入一项随机、平行分组、对照、评估者盲法的 8 周试验。23 名受试者每天晚上使用 SCT 方法(即,使用温和清洁剂在 1 小时后完全去除产品)使用 MP-凝胶,每天一次,23 名受试者被随机分配到 SAT 方法的相同凝胶中。主要终点是通过评估四项指标(红斑、干燥、刺痛和灼热)来评估耐受性评分(TS)的变化,采用 4 分评分量表(从 0:无症状到 3:严重症状)。次要终点是全球痤疮分级系统(GAGS)评分(范围:从 0 到>39)和研究者全球评估(IGA)评分(范围从 0 到 4)的变化。在第 2、4 和 8 周评估 TS。在基线和第 8 周评估 GAGS 和 IGA 评分。在第 8 周,还进行了疗效总评分(EGS)(从 1:无效到 4:非常有效)和耐受性总评分(TGS)(从 1:非常低耐受性到 3:非常好耐受性)的评估。所有评估均由一位不知道治疗组分配(SCT 或 SAT)的研究者进行。38 名受试者(83%)完成了 8 周的治疗期。由于皮肤耐受性低,8 名受试者(SCT 组 2 名,SAT 组 6 名)提前退出。在 SCT 中,第 2 周的 TS 为 1.3±1.7,而 SAT 组的 TS 明显更高(3.1±1.7)(P=.028)。SCT 组的 TS 在第 4 周和第 8 周也明显低于 SAT 组(P=.01;方差分析)。SCT 组基线时的 GAGS 评分为 19±7,SAT 组为 23±4(无统计学差异)。第 8 周时,SCT 组的 GAGS 评分显著降低至 8.5±2.8(-55%)(P=.001 与基线相比),并且与 SAT 组相比也显著降低(8.5 与 15;P=.0054)。SCT 组和 SAT 组基线时的 IGA 评分分别为 1.9±0.6 和 2.4±0.7。第 8 周时,与基线值相比,SCT 组的 IGA 评分降低了 48%,SAT 组降低了 30%。SCT 的 EGS 和 TGS 明显更高(更好的临床疗效和更好的耐受性),与 SAT 相比(3.6±0.5 和 2.9±0.3 与 2.7±0.6 和 1.5±0.7;分别)。这种含有维甲酸、克林霉素和甘醇酸的凝胶,以 SCT 的方式应用,在治疗轻度至中度痤疮方面显示出更好的皮肤耐受性,并且在临床疗效方面至少与标准应用方式相当。因此,SCT 可以是一种有效的治疗策略,可以提高患者的依从性。