Human Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Sport, Exercise, and Physiotherapy, University of Salford , Greater Manchester, UK.
Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University , Manchester, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2021 Feb;39(4):395-405. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1823130. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
The aim of the study was to compare ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics between the antepenultimate foot contact (APFC), penultimate foot contact (PFC), and final foot contact (FFC), and to examine the relationships between APFC, PFC, and FFC GRF characteristics with 505 change of direction (COD) speed performance. Twenty university male soccer players performed three COD trials, whereby GRFs were collected over the aforementioned foot contacts. Greater peak braking forces in shorter ground contact times were demonstrated over the APFC compared to the PFC and FFC ( ≤ 0.011, = 0.96-7.82), while APFC mean GRFs were greater than the PFC ( ≤ 0.001, = 1.86-7.57). Faster 505 performance was associated with greater APFC peak and mean vertical, horizontal, and resultant braking GRFs (= 21.6-54.5%), greater FFC mean HGRFs (= 38.8%), more horizontally orientated peak resultant APFC and PFC GRFs (= 22.8-55.4%), and greater APFC, PFC, and FFC mean horizontal to vertical GRF ratios (= 32.0-61.9%). Overall, the APFC plays a more pivotal role in facilitating deceleration compared to the PFC for effective 505 performance. Practitioners should develop their athletes' technical ability to express force horizontally across all foot contacts and coach braking strategies that emphasise greater magnitudes of posteriorly directed APFC GRFs to facilitate faster 505 performance.
本研究旨在比较前倒数第二足接触(APFC)、倒数第二足接触(PFC)和最终足接触(FFC)的地面反作用力(GRF)特征,并探讨 APFC、PFC 和 FFC GRF 特征与 505 变向速度性能之间的关系。20 名大学生男性足球运动员进行了三次变向测试,在此过程中收集了上述足接触点的 GRF。与 PFC 和 FFC 相比,APFC 的峰值制动力更大,地面接触时间更短(≤0.011,=0.96-7.82),而 APFC 的平均 GRF 大于 PFC(≤0.001,=1.86-7.57)。更快的 505 表现与更大的 APFC 峰值和平均垂直、水平和综合制动 GRF 相关(=21.6-54.5%),更大的 FFC 平均水平 GRF(=38.8%),更横向的 APFC 和 PFC 峰值综合 GRF(=22.8-55.4%),以及更大的 APFC、PFC 和 FFC 平均水平到垂直 GRF 比值(=32.0-61.9%)。总的来说,与 PFC 相比,APFC 在促进减速方面发挥了更关键的作用,有利于更有效的 505 表现。从业者应发展运动员在所有足接触点横向表达力量的技术能力,并指导强调更大幅度向后指向的 APFC GRF 的制动策略,以促进更快的 505 表现。