• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1987-2017 年印度尼西亚剖宫产使用的趋势和社会人口不平等。

Trends and sociodemographic inequalities in the use of caesarean section in Indonesia, 1987-2017.

机构信息

Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003844.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003844
PMID:33380412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7780721/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. CS can be a live-saving procedure when medically indicated, but it comes with higher risks for women and newborns when done without medical indication. Crucially, inequalities in who receives CS exist, both within and across countries. Understanding factors driving increasing rates and inequalities of CS is imperative to optimise the use of this life-saving intervention. This study aimed to investigate trends of CS use and inequalities across sociodemographic characteristics in Indonesia over a 30-year period.

METHODS

Seven waves of the Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey were used to estimate trends and inequalities in CS from 1987 to 2017. Relative and absolute inequalities across a range of sociodemographic characteristics were estimated and trends in inequalities were assessed through changes in rate ratio and rate difference.

RESULTS

The proportion of facility-based births in Indonesia has increased in the past 30 years, coinciding with an increase in CS rate (CSR) (1991 CSR: 1.6% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.9); 2017 CSR: 17.6% (95% CI 16.7 to 18.5)). Higher rates of CS are observed mostly in Western Indonesia, while lower CSRs are observed in Eastern Indonesia. Inequalities of CSRs in Indonesia are observed across type of health facility (public/private), regions, places of residence, wealth quintiles and maternal education, with the highest CSRs in more affluent and educated groups. Widening absolute inequalities of CS are observed across all sociodemographic characteristics, except facility type, where CSR gaps between public and private facilities have closed on both relative and absolute scales.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of increasing trends in CSRs and widening absolute inequalities in CSRs across different sociodemographic groups of women in Indonesia. The context of increasing CSRs across society, however, may have resulted in more stable relative inequalities. Improving understanding of the drivers of these trends in Indonesia and, particularly, of women's and providers' perspectives and preferences for childbirth, should be prioritised to optimise the use of CS.

摘要

引言

全球剖宫产率不断上升。当医学指征明确时,剖宫产可以是一种救命的手术,但如果没有医学指征而进行剖宫产,母婴风险会更高。至关重要的是,在国家内部和国家之间,谁接受剖宫产存在不平等现象。了解推动剖宫产率和不平等现象增加的因素对于优化这种救命干预措施的使用至关重要。本研究旨在调查 30 年来印度尼西亚剖宫产使用率和社会人口特征不平等的趋势。

方法

本研究使用了 7 次印度尼西亚人口与健康调查的数据,以估计 1987 年至 2017 年期间剖宫产的使用趋势和社会人口特征不平等。通过比率差异和比率比值的变化来评估不平等的趋势,并对一系列社会人口特征的相对和绝对不平等进行估计。

结果

在过去的 30 年里,印度尼西亚的医疗机构分娩比例有所增加,同时剖宫产率(CSR)也有所上升(1991 年 CSR:1.6%(95%CI 1.3 至 1.9);2017 年 CSR:17.6%(95%CI 16.7 至 18.5))。较高的剖宫产率主要出现在印度尼西亚西部,而较低的 CSR 则出现在东部。印度尼西亚的 CSR 不平等现象存在于医疗机构类型(公立/私立)、地区、居住地、财富五分位数和产妇教育程度等方面,最富裕和受教育程度较高的群体的 CSR 率最高。在所有社会人口特征中,剖宫产率的绝对不平等差距都在扩大,除了医疗机构类型,因为公立和私立医疗机构之间的 CSR 差距在相对和绝对两个尺度上都在缩小。

结论

本研究提供了证据表明,印度尼西亚不同社会人口群体的 CSR 呈上升趋势,CSR 的绝对不平等也在扩大。然而,由于社会整体上的 CSR 增加,相对不平等可能更加稳定。优先了解这些趋势的驱动因素,特别是了解妇女和提供者对分娩的观点和偏好,应该是优化剖宫产使用的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/976a424bf178/bmjgh-2020-003844f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/3a2a25a7960e/bmjgh-2020-003844f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/9551f55a5baf/bmjgh-2020-003844f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/37a86169f417/bmjgh-2020-003844f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/976a424bf178/bmjgh-2020-003844f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/3a2a25a7960e/bmjgh-2020-003844f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/9551f55a5baf/bmjgh-2020-003844f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/37a86169f417/bmjgh-2020-003844f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/706e/7780721/976a424bf178/bmjgh-2020-003844f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends and sociodemographic inequalities in the use of caesarean section in Indonesia, 1987-2017.1987-2017 年印度尼西亚剖宫产使用的趋势和社会人口不平等。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003844.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled attendance at birth and caesarean section rates in Myanmar 2015-2016: a cross-sectional study.2015-2016 年缅甸熟练接生和剖宫产率的社会经济不平等:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e076646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076646.
3
Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006-2016.尼泊尔剖宫产利用的趋势和社会人口学相关性:来自 2006-2016 年人口与健康调查的证据。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 3;2021:8888267. doi: 10.1155/2021/8888267. eCollection 2021.
4
Temporal trends in between and within-country inequalities in caesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian analysis.低、中收入国家剖宫产分娩的国内外不平等的时间趋势:贝叶斯分析。
BJOG. 2021 Nov;128(12):1928-1937. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16744. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Factors contributing to socio-economic inequality in utilization of caesarean section delivery among women in Indonesia: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey.导致印度尼西亚妇女剖宫产利用不平等的社会经济因素:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291485. eCollection 2023.
6
Caesarean section in Sudan: findings from nationwide household surveys on rates, trends, and geographic and sociodemographic variability.苏丹的剖宫产率:全国家庭调查的结果,包括发生率、趋势以及地理和社会人口学差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04995-3.
7
Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women's decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: a longitudinal qualitative study.剖宫产率上升及影响印度尼西亚妇女分娩方式选择的因素:一项纵向定性研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jun 18;9(6):e014602. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014602.
8
Time trends in facility-based and private-sector childbirth care: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 25 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2016.机构和私营部门的儿童分娩护理的时间趋势:2000 年至 2016 年来自 25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人口与健康调查分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020406.
9
Caesarean section and associated factors in Nigeria: assessing inequalities between rural and urban areas-insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018.尼日利亚的剖宫产术及其相关因素:评估农村和城市地区之间的不平等——来自 2018 年尼日利亚人口与健康调查的见解。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06722-6.
10
Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: A repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys.趋势、财富不平等与私营部门在中东和北非剖宫产术中的作用:基于人口的调查重复横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259791. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:文献综述
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9.
2
The first 1000 days: the price of inequalities in high and middle-income countries.最初的1000天:中高收入国家不平等现象的代价。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03880-x.
3
Trends and determinants of caesarean section in South Asian countries: Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions.减少不必要的剖宫产:财务和监管干预措施的范围审查
Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00983-y.
2
Impact of Indonesia's national health insurance scheme on inequality in access to maternal health services: A propensity score matched analysis.印度尼西亚国家医疗保险计划对获取产妇保健服务不平等的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010429. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010429.
3
Reasons for Increased Caesarean Section Rate in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study among Vietnamese Mothers and Health Care Professionals.
南亚国家(孟加拉国、尼泊尔和巴基斯坦)剖宫产的趋势及决定因素
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0311082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311082. eCollection 2024.
4
The Portrayal of Cesarean Section on Instagram: Mixed Methods Social Media Analysis.Instagram 上剖宫产的呈现:混合方法社交媒体分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 6;8:e46531. doi: 10.2196/46531.
5
Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women's decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: a longitudinal qualitative study.剖宫产率上升及影响印度尼西亚妇女分娩方式选择的因素:一项纵向定性研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jun 18;9(6):e014602. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014602.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled attendance at birth and caesarean section rates in Myanmar 2015-2016: a cross-sectional study.2015-2016 年缅甸熟练接生和剖宫产率的社会经济不平等:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e076646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076646.
7
Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis.针对孕妇的教育干预措施以优化剖宫产的使用:关键要素是什么?一项定性比较分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):1851. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0.
8
Factors contributing to socio-economic inequality in utilization of caesarean section delivery among women in Indonesia: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey.导致印度尼西亚妇女剖宫产利用不平等的社会经济因素:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291485. eCollection 2023.
9
Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features.针对医疗保健提供者的干预措施以优化剖宫产术的使用:确定重要干预特征的定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08783-9.
10
Caesarean section in Sudan: findings from nationwide household surveys on rates, trends, and geographic and sociodemographic variability.苏丹的剖宫产率:全国家庭调查的结果,包括发生率、趋势以及地理和社会人口学差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04995-3.
越南剖宫产率上升的原因:一项针对越南母亲和医护人员的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;8(1):41. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010041.
4
Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study.社会经济地位和移民身份对急诊剖宫产的预测作用:一项出生队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2725-5.
5
Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth.孕妇对分娩方式的认知与期望。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Dec;72(suppl 3):41-49. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0731.
6
Healthcare providers' perception of the referral system in maternal care facilities in Aceh, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.印度尼西亚亚齐省产妇保健机构中转诊系统的卫生保健提供者认知:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 8;9(12):e031484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031484.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data.加纳剖宫产利用中的社会经济不平等:使用全国代表性数据的横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 25;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1063-6.
8
Jakartans' Perceptions of Health Care Services.雅加达居民对医疗保健服务的看法。
Front Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;7:277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00277. eCollection 2019.
9
Examining inequalities in access to delivery by caesarean section in Nigeria.考察尼日利亚剖宫产获取机会的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221778. eCollection 2019.
10
Time trends in facility-based and private-sector childbirth care: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 25 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2016.机构和私营部门的儿童分娩护理的时间趋势:2000 年至 2016 年来自 25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人口与健康调查分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020406.