• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与具有多样化数据用途的健康信息网络的意愿:评估公众观点。

Willingness to Participate in Health Information Networks with Diverse Data Use: Evaluating Public Perspectives.

作者信息

Platt Jodyn, Raj Minakshi, Büyüktür Ayşe G, Trinidad M Grace, Olopade Olufunmilayo, Ackerman Mark S, Kardia Sharon

机构信息

University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Learning Health Sciences, US.

University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, US.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 25;7(1):33. doi: 10.5334/egems.288.

DOI:10.5334/egems.288
PMID:31367650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659576/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health information generated by health care encounters, research enterprises, and public health is increasingly interoperable and shareable across uses and users. This paper examines the US public's willingness to be a part of multi-user health information networks and identifies factors associated with that willingness.

METHODS

Using a probability-based sample (n = 890), we examined the univariable and multivariable relationships between willingness to participate in health information networks and demographic factors, trust, altruism, beliefs about the public's ethical obligation to participate in research, privacy, medical deception, and policy and governance using linear regression modeling.

RESULTS

Willingness to be a part of a multi-user network that includes health care providers, mental health, social services, research, or quality improvement is low (26 percent-7.4 percent, depending on the user). Using stepwise regression, we identified a model that explained 42.6 percent of the variability in willingness to participate and included nine statistically significant factors associated with the outcome: Trust in the health system, confidence in policy, the belief that people have an obligation to participate in research, the belief that health researchers are accountable for conducting ethical research, the desire to give permission, education, concerns about insurance, privacy, and preference for notification.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest willingness to be a part of multi-user data networks is low, but that attention to governance may increase willingness. Building trust to enable acceptance of multi-use data networks will require a commitment to aligning data access practices with the expectations of the people whose data is being used.

摘要

引言

由医疗保健服务、研究机构和公共卫生所产生的健康信息在不同用途和用户之间越来越具有互操作性和可共享性。本文考察了美国公众参与多用户健康信息网络的意愿,并确定了与该意愿相关的因素。

方法

我们采用基于概率的样本(n = 890),使用线性回归模型,考察了参与健康信息网络的意愿与人口统计学因素、信任、利他主义、对公众参与研究的道德义务的信念、隐私、医疗欺骗以及政策和治理之间的单变量和多变量关系。

结果

参与包含医疗保健提供者、心理健康、社会服务、研究或质量改进的多用户网络的意愿较低(26%-7.4%,取决于用户群体)。通过逐步回归,我们确定了一个模型,该模型解释了参与意愿中42.6%的变异性,并包含与结果相关的九个具有统计学意义的因素:对卫生系统的信任、对政策的信心、认为人们有参与研究的义务、认为健康研究人员有责任进行道德研究、给予许可的愿望、教育程度、对保险的担忧、隐私以及对通知的偏好。

讨论

我们的结果表明,参与多用户数据网络的意愿较低,但对治理的关注可能会提高意愿。建立信任以促使人们接受多用途数据网络,需要致力于使数据访问实践符合数据使用者的期望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/960f/6659576/e780e5209138/egems-7-1-288-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/960f/6659576/e780e5209138/egems-7-1-288-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/960f/6659576/e780e5209138/egems-7-1-288-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Willingness to Participate in Health Information Networks with Diverse Data Use: Evaluating Public Perspectives.参与具有多样化数据用途的健康信息网络的意愿:评估公众观点。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 25;7(1):33. doi: 10.5334/egems.288.
2
Do people have an ethical obligation to share their health information? Comparing narratives of altruism and health information sharing in a nationally representative sample.人们有分享自身健康信息的道德义务吗?在一个具有全国代表性的样本中比较利他主义与健康信息分享的叙述。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244767. eCollection 2020.
3
Perceptions, attitudes, and willingness of the public in low- and middle-income countries of the Arab region to participate in biobank research.阿拉伯中低收入国家公众对参与生物银行研究的看法、态度和意愿。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 1;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00855-z.
4
Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.肯尼亚卫生利益相关者对重新使用医院住院数据以支持医疗系统学习的个人同意、一般通知和治理流程的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0343-9.
5
Public trust in health information sharing: implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems.公众对健康信息共享的信任:对生物样本库和电子健康记录系统的影响。
J Pers Med. 2015 Feb 3;5(1):3-21. doi: 10.3390/jpm5010003.
6
Should Waste Separation Be Mandatory? A Study on Public's Response to the Policies in China.垃圾分类是否应该强制执行?公众对中国政策的反应研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124539.
7
Older adults' willingness to share their personal and health information when adopting healthcare technology and services.老年人在采用医疗保健技术和服务时愿意分享其个人和健康信息。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.公众对参与医学研究的意愿所持的态度。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02.
9
Belief of having had unconfirmed Covid-19 infection reduces willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing.认为曾感染过未经确诊的新冠病毒会降低参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5.
10
Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.公众对参与生物样本库用于研究的态度:一项意大利调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Nov 26;15:81. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectations of healthcare AI and the role of trust: understanding patient views on how AI will impact cost, access, and patient-provider relationships.对医疗人工智能的期望及信任的作用:了解患者对人工智能将如何影响成本、可及性以及医患关系的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):795-799. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf031.
2
Public comfort with the use of ChatGPT and expectations for healthcare.公众对使用 ChatGPT 的接受程度和对医疗保健的期望。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae164.
3
How to Elucidate Consent-Free Research Use of Medical Data: A Case for "Health Data Literacy".

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Health Care Information Technologies: Evaluation of Trust, Security Beliefs, and Privacy as Determinants of Health Care Outcomes.医疗信息技术的有效性:对信任、安全信念及隐私作为医疗结果决定因素的评估
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 11;20(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9014.
2
Statistical controversies in clinical research: data access and sharing-can we be more transparent about clinical research? Let's do what's right for patients.临床研究中的统计学争议:数据获取与共享——我们能否在临床研究中更加透明?为了患者,让我们做正确的事情。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1734-1737. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx123.
3
De-identified genomic data sharing: the research participant perspective.
如何阐释医学数据的免同意研究使用:“健康数据素养”之实例
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jun 18;12:e51350. doi: 10.2196/51350.
4
Progress with the Learning Health System 2.0: a rapid review of Learning Health Systems' responses to pandemics and climate change.学习型健康系统 2.0 的进展:对学习健康系统应对大流行病和气候变化的反应进行快速审查。
BMC Med. 2024 Mar 22;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03345-8.
5
Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.患者和公众对个人健康数据用于第三方或二次使用的意愿:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e50421. doi: 10.2196/50421.
6
Policy Preferences Regarding Health Data Sharing Among Patients With Cancer: Public Deliberations.癌症患者对健康数据共享的政策偏好:公众审议
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jan 31;9:e39631. doi: 10.2196/39631.
7
Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews.为养老院常规健康数据的二次利用建立治理框架:使用定性访谈的开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 25;25:e38929. doi: 10.2196/38929.
8
The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.学习型健康系统科学:实证研究的范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 23;10(2):e34907. doi: 10.2196/34907.
9
Secondary research use of personal medical data: patient attitudes towards data donation.个人医疗数据的二次研究利用:患者对数据捐赠的态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 15;22(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00728-x.
10
Do people have an ethical obligation to share their health information? Comparing narratives of altruism and health information sharing in a nationally representative sample.人们有分享自身健康信息的道德义务吗?在一个具有全国代表性的样本中比较利他主义与健康信息分享的叙述。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244767. eCollection 2020.
去识别化基因组数据共享:研究参与者视角
J Community Genet. 2017 Jul;8(3):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0300-1. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.影响加州消费者共享电子健康数据意愿的因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
5
A Scalable and Pragmatic Method for the Safe Sharing of High-Quality Health Data.一种可扩展且实用的高质量健康数据安全共享方法。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Mar;22(2):611-622. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2676880. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust.公众对健康信息共享的信任:系统信任的衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):824-845. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12654. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.公众对用于研究目的的健康数据共享和关联的反应:定性研究的系统评价与主题综合
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x.
8
Trust, vulnerable populations, and genetic data sharing.信任、弱势群体与基因数据共享。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Oct 29;2(3):747-753. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv044. eCollection 2015 Nov.
9
It depends whose data are being shared: considerations for genomic data sharing policies.这取决于所共享的数据归谁所有:基因组数据共享政策的考量因素。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Jul 21;2(3):697-704. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv030. eCollection 2015 Nov.
10
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.