Suppr超能文献

2008-2017 年厄瓜多尔性与生殖健康政策的突然变化对青少年生育率的影响。

Effect of an abrupt change in sexual and reproductive health policy on teen birth rates in Ecuador, 2008-2017.

机构信息

Health Services Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, United States.

Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02142, United States; NBER, United States.

出版信息

Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100967. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100967. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

Abstract

Several countries have implemented "family-centered" abstinence-only policies for teenagers, as opposed to encouraging utilization and expansion of reproductive health services and education. Little is known, however, about the effects of these more restrictive policies on adolescent birth rates at the national level or their differential effects by race and ethnicity. The extant literature is even scarcer in low- and middle-income countries. We analyze an unexpected policy change in Ecuador that abruptly reversed course and restricted reproductive health services for teenage women in 2014. We use a canton- and time-fixed effects difference-in-differences analysis of Ecuador's 221 cantons with time-varying controls to analyze the impact of the abrupt policy change on the difference of teen (15-19 years) minus young adult (20-24 years) birth rates. In a difference-in-difference-in-differences analysis, the policy change increases birth rates by 8.5 births per 1000 women in cantons with higher indigenous concentration. Results are robust to changes in the comparison population (young adults vs. women in their late 20 s or in their early 30 s), pre-intervention control periods, population weighting, serial correlation, logarithmic model specification, adjustments for intervention year, definition of indigenous concentration, and potential delays in policy implementation.

摘要

一些国家对青少年实施了“以家庭为中心”的禁欲政策,而不是鼓励利用和扩大生殖健康服务和教育。然而,人们对这些更严格的政策对国家一级青少年出生率的影响知之甚少,也不知道它们对不同种族和族裔的不同影响。现有的文献在中低收入国家更是稀缺。我们分析了厄瓜多尔的一个意外政策变化,该政策在 2014 年突然改变方向,限制了青少年女性的生殖健康服务。我们使用厄瓜多尔 221 个有时间变化控制的县的县和时间固定效应差分差异分析来分析突然政策变化对青少年(15-19 岁)减去年轻成年人(20-24 岁)出生率差异的影响。在差分差异分析中,政策变化使原住民集中度较高的县的出生率增加了每 1000 名妇女 8.5 个出生。结果在比较人群(年轻人与 20 多岁后期或 30 多岁早期的妇女)、干预前控制期、人口加权、序列相关、对数模型规范、干预年份调整、原住民集中度定义和政策实施潜在延迟方面发生变化时仍然稳健。

相似文献

1
Effect of an abrupt change in sexual and reproductive health policy on teen birth rates in Ecuador, 2008-2017.
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100967. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100967. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Do State-Based Policies Have an Impact on Teen Birth Rates and Teen Abortion Rates in the United States?
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
3
Teenage fertility in developing countries.
Stud Comp Int Dev. 1988 Winter;13(4):3-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02686982.
5
Australian teenagers and pregnancy.
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1984 Autumn;1:31-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03029374.
6
Vital signs: teen pregnancy--United States, 1991--2009.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Apr 8;60(13):414-20.
7
Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter?
J Econ Perspect. 2012 Spring;26(2):141-66. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.2.141.
8
Teenage pregnancy and fertility in New South Wales: an examination of fertility trends, abortion and birth outcomes.
Aust J Public Health. 1992 Sep;16(3):238-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1992.tb00061.x.
10
The health consequences of teenage fertility.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):132-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerating Well-being for Adolescents Through Transformative Public Policy: A Framework for Action.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Oct;75(4S):S37-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.03.013.
2
The Effects of Mobile Primary Health Teams: Evidence from the Strategy in Ecuador.
World Dev. 2024 Sep;181. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106659. Epub 2024 May 20.
3
Policies for expanding family planning coverage: lessons from five successful countries.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 14;12:1339725. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339725. eCollection 2024.
4
How to decrease teenage pregnancy: rural perspectives in Ecuador.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 1;12:1370507. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1370507. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Teenage Motherhood and Sibling Outcomes.
Am Econ Rev. 2017 May;107(5):633-7. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20171130.
3
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Causes and consequences of teen childbearing: Evidence from a reproductive health intervention in South Africa.
J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;57:221-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Family planning funding cuts and teen childbearing.
J Health Econ. 2017 Sep;55:168-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Physically Demanding Labor and Health Among Indigenous Women in the Ecuadorian Highlands.
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):220-226. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0407-7.
7
Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:39-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Do Targeted Reproductive Health Services Matter? - The Impact of a Midwife Program in Indonesia.
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):1667-1681. doi: 10.1002/hec.3465. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet-Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study.
Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):131-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00345-7. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
The Effects of State-Mandated Abstinence-Based Sex Education on Teen Health Outcomes.
Health Econ. 2017 Apr;26(4):403-420. doi: 10.1002/hec.3315. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验