College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Int Endod J. 2021 Jun;54(6):887-901. doi: 10.1111/iej.13471. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
There is no consensus on the true meaning of clinical regenerative endodontics, and there is confusion over the concept and the term. Commonly used terms include revitalization and revascularization. The clinical methods for endodontic revitalization procedures and the tissue engineering concept differ depending on whether there is exogenous delivery of cells - called cell therapy, or not. Here, in this review, the difference is clarified by emphasizing the correct terminology: cell-free versus cell-based regenerative endodontic therapy (CF-RET versus CB-RET). The revitalization procedures practised clinically do not fit into the modern tissue engineering concepts of pulp regeneration but can be categorized as CF-RET. The modern tissue engineering concept in pulp regeneration is a CB-RET, which so far is at the clinical trial stage. However, histological examination of teeth following regenerative endodontic treatments reveals healing with repair derived from stem cells that originate from the periodontal, bone and other tissues. The aim of regenerative endodontics is regeneration of the pulp-dentine complex. This review discusses why CF-RET is unlikely to regenerate a pulp-dentine complex with current protocols. The American Association of Endodontists and the European Society of Endodontology have not yet recommended autologous stem cell transplantation (CB-RERT) which aspires for regeneration. Therefore, an understanding of the concept, term, difficulties and differences in current protocols is important for the clinician. However, rather than being discouraged that ideal regeneration has not been achieved to date, repair can be an acceptable outcome in clinical regenerative endodontics as it has also been accepted in medicine. Repair should also be considered in the context that resolution of the clinical signs/symptoms of pulp necrosis/apical periodontitis is generally reliably obtained in clinical regenerative endodontics.
关于临床再生牙髓学的真正意义尚未达成共识,人们对这一概念和术语感到困惑。常用术语包括牙髓活力再生和再血管化。牙髓活力再生程序的临床方法和组织工程概念因是否有外源性细胞输送而有所不同——称为细胞疗法,或不进行细胞疗法。在这里,通过强调正确的术语,澄清了差异:无细胞与基于细胞的再生牙髓治疗(CF-RET 与 CB-RET)。临床上进行的活力再生程序不符合现代牙髓再生的组织工程概念,但可以归类为 CF-RET。现代牙髓再生的组织工程概念是 CB-RET,迄今为止,它仍处于临床试验阶段。然而,对再生牙髓治疗后的牙齿进行组织学检查显示,愈合是由源自牙周、骨骼和其他组织的干细胞衍生的修复细胞完成的。再生牙髓学的目的是再生牙髓 - 牙本质复合体。本文讨论了为什么根据目前的方案,CF-RET 不太可能再生牙髓 - 牙本质复合体。美国牙髓病学会和欧洲牙髓病学会尚未推荐自体干细胞移植(CB-RERT),因为该方法旨在实现再生。因此,理解概念、术语、当前方案的困难和差异对临床医生很重要。然而,与其因为迄今为止尚未实现理想的再生而感到沮丧,不如将修复视为临床再生牙髓学中可以接受的结果,因为它在医学领域也得到了认可。在临床再生牙髓学中,通常可以可靠地获得牙髓坏死/根尖周炎的临床体征/症状的缓解,因此也应在这一背景下考虑修复。