Mazzuca S A, Vinicor F, Cohen S J, Norton J A, Fineberg N S, Fineberg S E, Duckworth W C, Kuebler T W, Gordon E E, Clark C M
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02595748.
The Diabetes Education Study was a controlled trial of the effects of physician and patient education. This article describes an educational program for internal medicine residents and its effects on ambulatory diabetes management practices. Forty-five of 86 residents practicing in the general medicine clinic of a university-affiliated city/county hospital were assigned randomly to receive a multifaceted program intended to 1) provide specific care recommendations, 2) teach necessary skills, and 3) make the professional and institutional environment more supportive. During the subsequent 11 months, 323 diabetic patients were interviewed and their records audited for evidence of changes in care. Experimental residents utilized fasting blood glucose determinations more often than controls (i.e., during 40% of visits vs. 31%, p = 0.004). Experimental residents also engaged more frequently in a variety of recommended dietary management recommendations. Isolated differences in monitoring/management of chronic complications also were found (e.g., lipid screening: 70% of experimental residents' patients vs. 58%, p = 0.016). Intensive, multifaceted programs of this nature are concluded to result in improvements in diabetes care, over and above that which is attainable through routine methods of clinical training for residents.
糖尿病教育研究是一项关于医生和患者教育效果的对照试验。本文描述了一项针对内科住院医师的教育项目及其对门诊糖尿病管理实践的影响。在一所大学附属医院所在城市/县医院的普通内科门诊实习的86名住院医师中,有45名被随机分配接受一个多方面的项目,该项目旨在:1)提供具体的护理建议;2)教授必要的技能;3)使专业和机构环境更具支持性。在随后的11个月里,对323名糖尿病患者进行了访谈,并对他们的记录进行审核,以寻找护理变化的证据。实验组住院医师比对照组更频繁地进行空腹血糖测定(即,在40%的就诊中进行测定,而对照组为31%,p = 0.004)。实验组住院医师也更频繁地采用各种推荐的饮食管理建议。在慢性并发症的监测/管理方面也发现了一些孤立的差异(例如,血脂筛查:实验组住院医师的患者中有70%进行了筛查,而对照组为58%,p = 0.016)。结论是,这种强化的、多方面的项目能够改善糖尿病护理,其效果超过了通过住院医师常规临床培训方法所能达到的效果。