• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与老年人护理员接受培训相关的因素。

Factors Associated With Receipt of Training Among Caregivers of Older Adults.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):833-835. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8694.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8694
PMID:30958503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6547146/
Abstract

This study uses data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Survey to investigate whether family and unpaid caregiver characteristics are associated with the receipt of caregiver training.

摘要

本研究使用了 2015 年国家健康与老龄化趋势调查的数据，旨在探讨家庭和无偿照顾者的特征是否与接受照顾者培训有关。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Receipt of Training Among Caregivers of Older Adults.与老年人护理员接受培训相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):833-835. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8694.
2
Dementia: thief of hearts.痴呆症：心灵窃贼。
Ala Nurse. 2006 Sep-Nov;33(3):26-8; quiz 28-9.
3
Supporting family caregivers: teaching essential skills to family caregivers.支持家庭照顾者：教授家庭照顾者基本技能。
Am J Nurs. 2011 Nov;111(11):52-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000407303.23092.c3.
4
How do family caregivers describe their needs for professional help?家庭照顾者如何描述他们对专业帮助的需求？
Am J Nurs. 2008 Sep;108(9 Suppl):35-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000336411.37624.2b.
5
Caregiver perspectives on safety in home dementia care.照顾者对家庭痴呆症护理安全的看法。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Dec;29(8):993-1014. doi: 10.1177/0193945907303098. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
6
A pilot study on the influence of an individualized and experiential training on cancer caregiver's self-efficacy in home care and symptom management.一项关于个体化体验式培训对癌症照护者家庭照护及症状管理自我效能影响的试点研究。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2009 May;27(5):271-8. doi: 10.1097/01.nhh.0000356777.70503.62.
7
Delirium in advanced cancer: a psychoeducational intervention for family caregivers.晚期癌症患者的谵妄：针对家庭护理人员的心理教育干预措施
J Palliat Care. 2002 Winter;18(4):253-61.
8
Resources for patients. Coping ABCs for caregivers.患者资源。护理人员应对ABC法。
Prog Transplant. 2004 Jun;14(2):168, 167. doi: 10.1177/152692480401400211.
9
An evaluation of a wellness guide for older carers living in the community.社区中老年照护者的健康指南评估。
Public Health Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;27(4):302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00859.x.
10
Efficacy of behavioral interventions for dementia caregivers.针对痴呆症照料者的行为干预措施的效果
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Dec;29(8):944-60. doi: 10.1177/0193945907303084. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study Examining Caregivers' Perspectives on Healthcare System Barriers and Facilitators to Foregut Cancer Care.一项定性研究：探究护理人员对前肠癌症护理中医疗系统障碍与促进因素的看法。
J Surg Res. 2025 Jul 30;314:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.071.
2
Support for Care Economy Policies by Political Affiliation and Caregiving Responsibilities.按政治派别和照护责任划分的对护理经济政策的支持情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251204. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204.
3
Social determinants of health and their impact on depression in family caregivers of those with dementia: The importance of intermediary determinants.健康的社会决定因素及其对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者抑郁的影响：中介决定因素的重要性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jun;21(6):e70325. doi: 10.1002/alz.70325.
4
Development and Delivery of Enhanced Implementation Support to Disseminate a National Caregiver Skills Training Program.开发并提供强化实施支持以推广一项全国性护理者技能培训计划。
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 17;9(1):igae107. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae107. eCollection 2025.
5
Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care.基层医疗护理人员清单的开发与评估
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000937.
6
Cultural adaptations of the WHO iSupport for dementia: A scoping review.世界卫生组织“iSupport痴呆症”的文化适应性：一项范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2025 May;24(4):767-793. doi: 10.1177/14713012241283860. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
7
A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisite family caregiver skills training program.一项阶梯楔形整群随机试验，以评估多地点家庭照顾者技能培训项目的有效性。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14326. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14326. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial.一项多地点阶梯式楔形整群随机家庭照顾者技能培训试验的实施结果
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14361. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14361. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
9
A randomised controlled trial of the () intervention to improve dementia family caregivers' self-efficacy with complex care.一项关于（）干预措施以提高痴呆症家庭护理人员复杂护理自我效能的随机对照试验。
Res Sq. 2024 May 27:rs.3.rs-3950114. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3950114/v1.
10
A randomised controlled trial of the Learning Skills Together (LST) intervention to improve dementia family caregivers' self-efficacy with complex care.一项针对 Learning Skills Together (LST) 干预措施的随机对照试验，以提高痴呆症家庭照顾者在复杂护理方面的自我效能感。
Trials. 2024 Jun 8;25(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08204-8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Care and Learn Model: a Practice and Research Model for Improving Healthcare Quality and Outcomes.关爱与学习模式：提升医疗质量和效果的实践与研究模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):154-158. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4737-7. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions Designed to Prevent Hospital Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.旨在预防医院再入院的质量改进干预措施的经济评估：系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):975-985. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1136.
3
Supporting Family Caregivers of Older Americans.支持美国老年人的家庭护理人员。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2513-2515. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1612351.
4
A National Profile of Family and Unpaid Caregivers Who Assist Older Adults With Health Care Activities.协助老年人进行医疗保健活动的家庭及无薪照料者的全国概况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):372-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7664.