• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚一家三级医院糖尿病诊所的医护人员与患者之间的共同决策。

Shared decision-making between health care providers and patients at a tertiary hospital diabetic Clinic in Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Health Professionalism, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06041-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-06041-4
PMID:33397373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7780625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' participation in decision making regarding their treatment is defined in ethical, legal and human rights standards in the provision of care that concerns health providers and the entire community. This study was conducted to document experiences of patients and health care providers on shared decision making.

METHODS

This study employed a phenomenological study design using in-depth interview technique. Study participants were diabetic patients visiting the clinic and healthcare providers working at Muhimbili National Hospital. Data was collected using the semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions using an audio digital recorder. Content analysis method was used during analysis whereby categories were reached through the process of coding assisted by Nvivo 12 software.

RESULTS

Participants in this study expressed the role of shared decision-making in the care of patients with diabetes, with report of engagement of patients by health care providers in making treatment decisions. Participants reported no use of decision-making aids; however, health education tools were reported by participants to be used for educating patients. Limited time, patient beliefs and literacy were documented as barriers of effective engagement of patients in decision making by their healthcare providers.

CONCLUSION

Engagement of patients in decision-making was noted in this study as experienced by participants of this study. Time, patient beliefs and patient literacy were documented as barriers for patients engagement, therefore diabetic clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital need to devise mechanisms for ensuring patients involvement in treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

在涉及医疗保健提供者和整个社区的护理提供方面,患者参与治疗决策的问题在伦理、法律和人权标准中都有明确定义。本研究旨在记录患者和医疗保健提供者在共同决策方面的经验。

方法

本研究采用现象学研究设计,使用深度访谈技术。研究参与者为访问诊所的糖尿病患者和在穆希比利国家医院工作的医疗保健提供者。使用带有开放式问题的半结构化访谈指南,通过音频数字记录器收集数据。在分析过程中使用内容分析法,通过编码过程达到类别,由 Nvivo 12 软件辅助。

结果

本研究中的参与者表达了共同决策在糖尿病患者护理中的作用,并报告了医疗保健提供者让患者参与治疗决策的情况。参与者报告没有使用决策辅助工具;然而,参与者报告使用健康教育工具来教育患者。研究记录了有限的时间、患者的信念和文化程度是医疗保健提供者有效让患者参与决策的障碍。

结论

本研究记录了患者参与决策的情况,这是参与者的经验。时间、患者的信念和患者的文化程度被记录为患者参与的障碍,因此穆希比利国家医院的糖尿病诊所需要设计机制,确保患者参与治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making between health care providers and patients at a tertiary hospital diabetic Clinic in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚一家三级医院糖尿病诊所的医护人员与患者之间的共同决策。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06041-4.
2
An insight into patients' perspectives on barriers affecting participation in shared decision making among patients with diabetes mellitus in Malawi.洞察马拉维糖尿病患者对影响参与共同决策的障碍的看法。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 10;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01635-9.
3
Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Shared Decision-Making: Designing Personal Health Record Technology With Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.超越共享决策的言辞:为 1 型糖尿病的年轻患者设计个人健康记录技术。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers.在西方国家基于医院的姑息治疗中为健康素养有限的患者提供适当的信息和决策支持:针对医疗保健提供者可用的沟通策略和工具的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Apr 12;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0421-x.
6
Opportunities and limitations of shared decision making in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation - A qualitative interview study with providers.有患者参与的多学科肿瘤会议中共享决策的机会和局限性 - 提供者的定性访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Content and system development of a digital patient-provider communication tool to support shared decision making in chronic health care: InvolveMe.数字医患沟通工具的内容和系统开发,以支持慢性病医疗中的共同决策:InvolveMe。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1065-8.
8
'A basic understanding'; evaluation of a blended training programme for healthcare providers in hospital-based palliative care to improve communication with patients with limited health literacy.“基本理解”:评估基于医院的姑息治疗中为医疗保健提供者提供的混合培训计划,以改善与健康素养有限的患者的沟通。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03685-0.
9
Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare.健康素养与共享决策:探索建立关系,以实现医疗保健中具有意义的患者参与。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):521-524. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Experiences and ethical issues during shared decision-making in healthcare at rural health facilities in Uganda: An exploratory qualitative study.乌干达农村医疗机构医疗保健共同决策过程中的经验与伦理问题:一项探索性定性研究。
Res Sq. 2024 Sep 16:rs.3.rs-4930541. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4930541/v1.

引用本文的文献

1
": A qualitative study of women's perceptions and experiences of medical reasons for non-preferred contraceptive use.:一项关于女性对非首选避孕方法使用的医学原因的认知与经历的定性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251358983. doi: 10.1177/17455057251358983. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Decision-making and role preferences for receiving individual pharmacogenomic research results among participants at a Ugandan HIV research institute.乌干达一家艾滋病研究所的参与者对接受个人药物基因组学研究结果的决策及角色偏好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 8;26(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01181-w.
3
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
4
Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Teaching for Medical Students in Shared Decision-Making Communication Skills Training.比较线上教学与面对面教学对医学生共同决策沟通技能培训的效果
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1403-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09268-7. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
5
A Critical Review of Diagnostic Strategies and Maternal Offspring Complications in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.妊娠期糖尿病诊断策略与母儿并发症的批判性综述
Cureus. 2023 Dec 24;15(12):e51016. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51016. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Shared decision making on mode of delivery following a prior cesarean delivery in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆市剖宫产后分娩方式的共享决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0291809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291809. eCollection 2023.
7
Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program.提高高风险手术患者护理目标记录的质量和频率:手术暂停计划的一年结果
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 24;8(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00107. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
8
A Decision Aid for Postpartum Adolescent Family Planning: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Tanzania.《青少年产妇产后计划生育决策辅助工具:坦桑尼亚的一项准实验研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064904.
9
An insight into patients' perspectives on barriers affecting participation in shared decision making among patients with diabetes mellitus in Malawi.洞察马拉维糖尿病患者对影响参与共同决策的障碍的看法。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 10;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01635-9.
10
Polypharmacy Exposure, Aging Populations, and COVID-19: Considerations for Healthcare Providers and Public Health Practitioners in Africa.多药治疗暴露、人口老龄化和 COVID-19:非洲医疗保健提供者和公共卫生从业者的考虑因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910263.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions on patient-centered care at primary health care level in rural eastern Uganda: A qualitative inquiry.乌干达东部农村初级卫生保健中以患者为中心的护理的利益攸关方认知:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0221649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221649. eCollection 2019.
2
Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review.促进慢性病共同决策要素的决策辅助工具:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4.
3
Understanding the manifestation of diabetes in sub Saharan Africa to inform therapeutic approaches and preventive strategies: a narrative review.了解撒哈拉以南非洲地区糖尿病的表现以指导治疗方法和预防策略:一项叙述性综述
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Feb 14;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0077-8. eCollection 2019.
4
Interventions to Support Behavioral Self-Management of Chronic Diseases.支持慢性病行为自我管理的干预措施。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:127-146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044008. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Decision-making experiences of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) regarding treatment in Ghana: a qualitative study.加纳终末期肾病患者治疗决策体验的定性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Dec 19;19(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1175-z.
6
'He should feel your pain': Patient insights on patient-provider communication in Rwanda.“他应该感受你的痛苦”:卢旺达患者对医患沟通的见解
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Apr 16;10(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1514.
7
Patients' perspectives on how to decrease the burden of treatment: a qualitative study of HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa.患者对减轻治疗负担的看法:撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒护理的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):266-275. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007564. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
8
Patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process for treating diabetic retinopathy.患者参与糖尿病视网膜病变治疗决策过程的偏好。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0526-z.
9
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
10
A Diabetes Self-Management Program: 12-Month Outcome Sustainability From a Nonreinforced Pragmatic Trial.一项糖尿病自我管理计划:非强化实用性试验的12个月结果可持续性
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 15;18(12):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6484.