Suppr超能文献

两种方法和两种麻醉剂用于去势时仔猪局部麻醉的效果。

Effect of two methods and two anaesthetics for local anaesthesia of piglets during castration.

机构信息

Landbrug & Fødevarer F.m.b.A., SEGES, Axeltorv 3, 1609, Copenhagen V, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Vet Scand. 2021 Jan 6;63(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00566-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since January 2019, surgical castration of male piglets must be performed using local anaesthesia, if farmers deliver pigs to the primary exporting slaughterhouses according to the "Danish quality scheme"; a voluntary initiative taken by the Danish pig industry. The approved procedure for local anaesthesia in Denmark is a three-step injection method with procaine. A comparison of lidocaine and procaine with the same concentration and injection methods of local anaesthetics has not previously been studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two injection methods and two local anaesthetics on piglets' avoidance behaviour (vocalisation and resistance movements) as well as the time spent on the procedures. The study included 203 male piglets that were randomly assigned to one of five treatments: 1.

CONTROL

Sham-handling without injection of local anaesthesia, 2. Pro3: Procaine injection using a three-step method, 3. Pro2: Procaine injection using a two-step method, 4. Lid3: Lidocaine injection using a three-step method, 5. Lid2: Lidocaine injection using a two-step method. During injection of local anaesthesia and castration, vocalisation was measured using a decibel meter and resistance movements were registrated by video recordings.

RESULTS

During castration, piglets treated with local anaesthesia showed significantly reduced vocalisation and resistance movements and time spent on castration was also significantly reduced compared to the control group. During injection of the local anaesthesia, the piglets had significantly increased vocalisation and resistance movements compared to the control group. Piglets injected with lidocaine had a significantly reduced resistance movement score and a tendency to reduced vocalisation compared to piglets injected with procaine. No differences in avoidance behaviour were found between the injection methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of local anaesthesia, irrespective of the method and local anaesthetic, was effective in reducing vocalisation and resistance movements during surgery as well as the time spent on castration.

摘要

背景

自 2019 年 1 月以来,如果农民按照“丹麦质量计划”(丹麦养猪业的一项自愿倡议)将小猪送到主要出口屠宰场,那么对雄性小猪进行手术去势必须使用局部麻醉。在丹麦,批准的局部麻醉程序是一种三步注射方法,使用普鲁卡因。局部麻醉剂利多卡因和普鲁卡因的浓度和注射方法相同,但之前没有对此进行过比较研究。本研究的目的是研究两种注射方法和两种局部麻醉剂对小猪的回避行为(发声和抵抗运动)以及手术时间的影响。该研究包括 203 头雄性小猪,它们被随机分配到以下五种处理方式之一:1. 对照组:不注射局部麻醉进行假处理,2. Pro3:采用三步法注射普鲁卡因,3. Pro2:采用两步法注射普鲁卡因,4. Lid3:采用三步法注射利多卡因,5. Lid2:采用两步法注射利多卡因。在局部麻醉和去势过程中,使用分贝计测量发声,并用视频记录抵抗运动。

结果

在去势过程中,与对照组相比,接受局部麻醉的小猪发声和抵抗运动明显减少,去势时间也明显减少。在注射局部麻醉剂期间,与对照组相比,小猪的发声和抵抗运动明显增加。与注射普鲁卡因的小猪相比,注射利多卡因的小猪的抵抗运动评分显著降低,发声有减少的趋势。在注射方法之间未发现回避行为的差异。

结论

无论使用哪种方法和哪种局部麻醉剂,局部麻醉均可有效减少手术过程中的发声和抵抗运动,以及去势时间。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Impact of Injection Speed, Volume, and Site on Pain Sensation.注射速度、注射量和注射部位对疼痛感觉的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):163-168. doi: 10.1177/1932296817735121. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
6
Pig castration: will the EU manage to ban pig castration by 2018?猪阉割:欧盟能否在2018年前成功禁止猪阉割?
Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Dec 20;2:29. doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0046-x. eCollection 2016.
7
A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.猪的疼痛评估综述
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Nov 28;3:108. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验