University of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States.
University of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88(6):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
Many static postural tasks requiring vestibular contributions are completed while dual- tasking.
We investigated the influence of dual-tasks on sensory integration for postural control and cognitive performance during the sensory organization test and examined the relationship between cognitive function and dual-task cost during the sensory organization test.
Twenty adults completed single and dual-task versions of the six conditions of the sensory organization test were completed during two visits separated by one week. A subset of 13 participants completed three National Institute of Health (NIH)-toolbox cognitive tests including the Flanker inhibitory control and attention test, dimensional change card sort test and pattern comparison processing speed test. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare postural sway during single and dual-task sensory organization test. Friedman's test, with pairwise comparison post-hoc tests, was used to compare single task serial subtraction performance to the 6 dual-task sensory organization test conditions. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between cognitive performance on NIH-toolbox test and postural and cognitive dual-task cost during the sensory organization test.
Performing a cognitive dual-task during the sensory organization test resulted in a significant increase in postural sway during condition 1 (Z=-3.26, p=0.001, ES=0.73), condition 3 (Z=-2.53, p=0.012, ES=0.56), and condition 6 (Z=-2.02, p=0.044, ES=0.45). Subtraction performance significantly decreased in during condition 6 (Z=-2.479, p=0.011, ES=0.55) compared to single-task. The dimensional change card sort test demonstrated moderate correlations with dual-task cost of serial subtraction performance in condition 5 (dimensional change card sort test: r=-0.62, p=0.02) and condition 6 (dimensional change card sort test: r=-0.56, p=0.04). Pattern comparison processing speed test scores were significantly correlated with dual-task cost of postural control during condition 2.
Performing a cognitive task during the sensory organization test resulted in significantly increased postural sway during three conditions, particularly during visual environment manipulation oppose to vestibular and somatosensory manipulation. Cognitive performance decreased during the most complex sensory organization test condition. Additionally, we found participants with poorer executive function had greater dual-task cost during more complex sensory integration demands.
许多需要前庭贡献的静态姿势任务是在双重任务下完成的。
我们研究了双重任务对姿势控制感觉整合的影响,并检查了感觉组织测试中认知功能与双重任务成本之间的关系。
20 名成年人在两次访问之间完成了感觉组织测试的六个条件的单任务和双任务版本,每次访问间隔一周。其中 13 名参与者完成了三个 NIH 工具包认知测试,包括 Flanker 抑制控制和注意力测试、维度变化卡片分类测试和模式比较处理速度测试。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验用于比较单任务和双任务感觉组织测试期间的姿势摆动。Friedman 检验,带有两两比较事后检验,用于比较单任务连续减法表现与 6 个双任务感觉组织测试条件。Spearman 相关系数用于评估 NIH 工具包测试中的认知表现与感觉组织测试中的姿势和认知双重任务成本之间的关系。
在感觉组织测试中执行认知双重任务会导致在条件 1(Z=-3.26,p=0.001,ES=0.73)、条件 3(Z=-2.53,p=0.012,ES=0.56)和条件 6(Z=-2.02,p=0.044,ES=0.45)期间的姿势摆动明显增加。与单任务相比,条件 6(Z=-2.479,p=0.011,ES=0.55)的减法表现显著下降。维度变化卡片分类测试与条件 5(维度变化卡片分类测试:r=-0.62,p=0.02)和条件 6(维度变化卡片分类测试:r=-0.56,p=0.04)的连续减法表现的双重任务成本呈中度相关。模式比较处理速度测试分数与条件 2 时的姿势控制双重任务成本显著相关。
在感觉组织测试中执行认知任务会导致在三个条件下,特别是在视觉环境操作反对前庭和躯体感觉操作时,姿势摆动明显增加。在最复杂的感觉组织测试条件下,认知表现下降。此外,我们发现执行功能较差的参与者在更复杂的感觉整合需求下,双重任务成本更高。