Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;8:614113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.614113. eCollection 2020.
Despite vast improvements in global vaccination coverage during the last decade, there is a growing trend in vaccine hesitancy and/or refusal globally. This has implications for the acceptance and coverage of a potential vaccine against COVID-19. In the United States, the number of children exempt from vaccination for "philosophical belief-based" non-medical reasons increased in 12 of the 18 states that allowed this policy from 2009 to 2017 (1). Meanwhile, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially in young children, have led to increasing rates of drug resistance that threaten our ability to treat infectious diseases. Vaccine hesitancy and antibiotic overuse exist side-by-side in the same population of young children, and it is unclear why one modality (antibiotics) is universally seen as safe and effective, while the other (vaccines) is seen as potentially hazardous by some. In this review, we consider the drivers shaping the use of vaccines and antibiotics in the context of three factors: individual incentives, risk perceptions, and social norms and group dynamics. We illustrate how these factors contribute to the societal and individual costs of vaccine underuse and antimicrobial overuse. Ultimately, we seek to understand these factors that are at the nexus of infectious disease epidemiology and social science to inform policy-making.
尽管在过去十年中,全球疫苗接种覆盖率有了巨大的提高,但在全球范围内,疫苗犹豫和/或拒绝的趋势日益明显。这对接受和覆盖潜在的 COVID-19 疫苗产生了影响。在美国,从 2009 年到 2017 年,有 18 个州中的 12 个允许这种政策,因“基于哲学信仰的”非医学原因而免于接种疫苗的儿童人数有所增加(1)。与此同时,抗生素的过度和滥用,尤其是在幼儿中,导致耐药率不断上升,这威胁到我们治疗传染病的能力。疫苗犹豫和抗生素滥用并存于同一批幼儿中,目前尚不清楚为什么一种方式(抗生素)被普遍认为是安全有效的,而另一种方式(疫苗)却被一些人认为存在潜在危险。在这篇综述中,我们考虑了在三个因素的背景下塑造疫苗和抗生素使用的驱动因素:个人激励、风险认知以及社会规范和群体动态。我们说明了这些因素如何导致疫苗接种不足和抗生素过度使用的社会和个人成本。最终,我们试图了解处于传染病流行病学和社会科学交叉点的这些因素,以为决策提供信息。