Rae Charlotte L, Parkinson Jim, Betka Sophie, Gouldvan Praag Cassandra D, Bouyagoub Samira, Polyanska Liliana, Larsson Dennis E O, Harrison Neil A, Garfinkel Sarah N, Critchley Hugo D
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex BN1 9QH, UK.
Department of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.
Brain Commun. 2020 Nov 27;2(2):fcaa199. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa199. eCollection 2020.
Tourette syndrome is characterized by 'unvoluntary' tics, which are compulsive, yet often temporarily suppressible. The inferior frontal gyrus is implicated in motor control, including inhibition of pre-potent actions through influences on downstream subcortical and motor regions. Although tic suppression in Tourette syndrome also engages the inferior frontal gyrus, it is unclear whether such prefrontal control of action is also dysfunctional: Tic suppression studies do not permit comparison with control groups, and neuroimaging studies of motor inhibition can be confounded by the concurrent expression or suppression of tics. Here, patients with Tourette syndrome were directly compared to control participants when performing an intentional inhibition task during functional MRI. Tic expression was recorded throughout for removal from statistical models. Participants were instructed to make a button press in response to Go cues, withhold responses to NoGo cues, and decide whether to press or withhold to 'Choose' cues. Overall performance was similar between groups, for both intentional inhibition rates (% Choose-Go) and reactive NoGo inhibition commission errors. A subliminal face prime elicited no additional effects on intentional or reactive inhibition. Across participants, the task activated prefrontal and motor cortices and subcortical nuclei, including pre-supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, caudate nucleus, thalamus and primary motor cortex. In Tourette syndrome, activity was elevated in the inferior frontal gyrus, insula and basal ganglia, most notably within the right inferior frontal gyrus during voluntary action and inhibition (Choose-Go and Choose-NoGo), and reactive inhibition (NoGo-correct). Anatomically, the locus of this inferior frontal gyrus hyperactivation during control of voluntary action matched that previously reported for tic suppression. In Tourette syndrome, activity within the caudate nucleus was also enhanced during both intentional (Choose-NoGo) and reactive (NoGo-correct) inhibition. Strikingly, despite the absence of overt motor behaviour, primary motor cortex activity increased in patients with Tourette syndrome but decreased in controls during both reactive and intentional inhibition. Additionally, severity of premonitory sensations scaled with functional connectivity of the pre-supplementary motor area to the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus and thalamus when choosing to respond (Choose-Go). Together, these results suggest that patients with Tourette syndrome use equivalent prefrontal mechanisms to suppress tics and withhold non-tic actions, but require greater inferior frontal gyrus engagement than controls to overcome motor drive from hyperactive downstream regions, notably primary motor cortex. Moreover, premonitory sensations may cue midline motor regions to generate tics through interactions with the basal ganglia.
抽动秽语综合征的特征是“非自愿性”抽动,这些抽动是强迫性的,但通常可暂时抑制。额下回与运动控制有关,包括通过影响下游皮层下和运动区域来抑制优势动作。虽然抽动秽语综合征中的抽动抑制也涉及额下回,但尚不清楚这种前额叶对动作的控制是否也存在功能障碍:抽动抑制研究无法与对照组进行比较,而运动抑制的神经影像学研究可能会因抽动的同时表达或抑制而混淆。在此,在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间,将抽动秽语综合征患者与对照参与者在执行有意抑制任务时进行了直接比较。在整个过程中记录抽动表达,以便从统计模型中去除。参与者被指示在出现“执行”提示时按下按钮,对“不执行”提示不做反应,并决定对“选择”提示是按下还是不按。两组在有意抑制率(%选择-执行)和反应性“不执行”抑制的错误率方面总体表现相似。阈下面孔启动对有意或反应性抑制没有额外影响。在所有参与者中,该任务激活了前额叶和运动皮层以及皮层下核团,包括辅助运动前区、额下回、岛叶、尾状核、丘脑和初级运动皮层。在抽动秽语综合征患者中,额下回、岛叶和基底神经节的活动增强,在自愿动作和抑制(选择-执行和选择-不执行)以及反应性抑制(不执行-正确)期间,最明显的是右侧额下回。在解剖学上,在自愿动作控制期间额下回过度激活的部位与先前报道的抽动抑制部位相匹配。在抽动秽语综合征患者中,在有意(选择-不执行)和反应性(不执行-正确)抑制期间,尾状核内的活动也增强。引人注目的是,尽管没有明显的运动行为,但在反应性和有意抑制期间,抽动秽语综合征患者的初级运动皮层活动增加,而对照组则减少。此外,当选择做出反应(选择-执行)时,预感的严重程度与辅助运动前区与尾状核、苍白球和丘脑的功能连接程度相关。总之,这些结果表明,抽动秽语综合征患者使用等效的前额叶机制来抑制抽动和抑制非抽动动作,但比对照组需要更大程度的额下回参与,以克服来自过度活跃的下游区域(尤其是初级运动皮层)的运动驱动。此外,预感可能通过与基底神经节的相互作用提示中线运动区域产生抽动。