Zurlo Maria Clelia, Cattaneo Della Volta Maria Francesca, Vallone Federica
Dynamic Psychology Laboratory, Department of Political Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 22;11:614887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614887. eCollection 2020.
Research has shown a direct relationship between infertility-related stress and anxiety in infertile patients. The present study goes into this relationship in depth, testing the moderating role of coping strategies (Seeking Social Support, Avoidant, Positive Attitude, Problem-Solving, Turning to Religion) in the associations between specific infertility-related stress dimensions (Social Concern, Need for Parenthood, Rejection of Childfree Lifestyle, Couple's Relationship Concern) and State-Anxiety among male and female partners of infertile couples. Gender differences were also explored. Both members of 254 infertile couples completed a questionnaire consisting of Socio-demographics, Fertility Problem Inventory-Short Form (FPI-SF), Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced-New Italian Version (COPE-NIV), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y (STAI-Y). The results revealed that Social Concern and Couple's Relationship Concern, in both partners, and Need for Parenthood, in female partners, had positive correlations with State-Anxiety. Seeking Social Support and Avoidant coping were related to increasing levels of State-Anxiety in both partners, whereas Positive Attitude coping strategies were related to lower levels of State-Anxiety in female partners. Problem-Solving and Avoidant coping played moderating roles between specific infertility-related stress dimensions and State-Anxiety in unexpected directions. Problem-Solving exacerbated the negative effects of Social Concern, whereas Avoidant coping buffered the negative effects of several infertility-related stress dimensions in both partners. Interventions to improve stress management and psychological health in infertile couples should consider that the adequacy of coping strategies is inherently situation specific. It therefore follows that patient-centered clinical interventions should consider the potential inadequacy of promoting Problem-Solving strategies, and that even Avoidance can be an efficient strategy for dealing with specific infertility-related stress dimensions.
研究表明,不孕不育相关压力与不孕患者的焦虑之间存在直接关系。本研究深入探讨了这种关系,测试了应对策略(寻求社会支持、回避、积极态度、解决问题、求助宗教)在特定不孕不育相关压力维度(社会关注、生育需求、拒绝无子女生活方式、夫妻关系关注)与不孕夫妇男女双方的状态焦虑之间的关联中所起的调节作用。同时也探讨了性别差异。254对不孕夫妇的双方都完成了一份问卷,该问卷包括社会人口统计学、生育问题简表(FPI-SF)、应对问题的新意大利版本(COPE-NIV)以及状态-特质焦虑量表-Y(STAI-Y)。结果显示,双方的社会关注和夫妻关系关注,以及女性伴侣的生育需求,均与状态焦虑呈正相关。寻求社会支持和回避应对与双方状态焦虑水平的升高有关,而积极态度应对策略与女性伴侣较低的状态焦虑水平有关。解决问题和回避应对在特定不孕不育相关压力维度与状态焦虑之间起到了意想不到的调节作用。解决问题加剧了社会关注的负面影响,而回避应对缓冲了双方多种不孕不育相关压力维度的负面影响。改善不孕夫妇压力管理和心理健康的干预措施应考虑到应对策略的充分性本质上是因具体情况而异的。因此,以患者为中心的临床干预应考虑到推广解决问题策略可能存在的不足,甚至回避也可能是应对特定不孕不育相关压力维度的有效策略。