Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Centre for Integrative Neurosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117700. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117700. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Scientific excellence is a necessity for progress in biomedical research. As research becomes ever more international, establishing international collaborations will be key to advancing our scientific knowledge. Understanding the similarities in standards applied by different nations to animal research, and where the differences might lie, is crucial. Cultural differences and societal values will also contribute to these similarities and differences between countries and continents. Our overview is not comprehensive for all species, but rather focuses on non-human primate (NHP) research, involving New World marmosets and Old World macaques, conducted in countries where NHPs are involved in neuroimaging research. Here, an overview of the ethics and regulations is provided to help assess welfare standards amongst primate research institutions. A comparative examination of these standards was conducted to provide a basis for establishing a common set of standards for animal welfare. These criteria may serve to develop international guidelines, which can be managed by an International Animal Welfare and Use Committee (IAWUC). Internationally, scientists have a moral responsibility to ensure excellent care and welfare of their animals, which in turn, influences the quality of their research. When working with animal models, maintaining a high quality of care ("culture of care") and welfare is essential. The transparent promotion of this level of care and welfare, along with the results of the research and its impact, may reduce public concerns associated with animal experiments in neuroscience research.
科学卓越是生物医学研究进步的必要条件。随着研究变得越来越国际化,建立国际合作将是推进我们科学知识的关键。了解不同国家应用于动物研究的标准的相似之处,以及可能存在的差异,至关重要。文化差异和社会价值观也将促成国家和大陆之间的这些相似性和差异。我们的概述并非针对所有物种全面涵盖,而是侧重于涉及新世界狨猴和旧世界猕猴的非人类灵长类动物(NHP)研究,这些研究在涉及神经影像学研究的 NHPs 的国家进行。在这里,提供了伦理和法规概述,以帮助评估灵长类动物研究机构的福利标准。对这些标准进行了比较研究,为制定一套共同的动物福利标准奠定了基础。这些标准可以用来制定国际准则,由国际动物福利和使用委员会(IAWUC)管理。在国际上,科学家有责任确保他们的动物得到良好的照顾和福利,这反过来又影响了他们的研究质量。在使用动物模型时,保持高质量的护理(“护理文化”)和福利至关重要。透明地促进这种护理和福利水平,以及研究结果及其影响,可能会减少与神经科学研究中的动物实验相关的公众关注。