• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多类机器学习模型预测需要再灌注治疗的急性缺血性卒中的预后。

Using a Multiclass Machine Learning Model to Predict the Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Requiring Reperfusion Therapy.

作者信息

Chiu I-Min, Zeng Wun-Huei, Cheng Chi-Yung, Chen Shih-Hsuan, Lin Chun-Hung Richard

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804201, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;11(1):80. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010080.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11010080
PMID:33419013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7825282/
Abstract

Prediction of functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients is useful for clinical decisions. Previous studies mostly elaborate on the prediction of favorable outcomes. Miserable outcomes, which are usually defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 5-6, should be considered as well before further invasive intervention. By using a machine learning algorithm, we aimed to develop a multiclass classification model for outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke patients requiring reperfusion therapy. This was a retrospective study performed at a stroke medical center in Taiwan. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who visited between January 2016 and December 2019 and who were candidates for reperfusion therapy were included. Clinical outcomes were classified as favorable outcome, intermediate outcome, and miserable outcome. We developed four different multiclass machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Supportive Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting) to predict clinical outcomes and compared their performance to the DRAGON score. A sample of 590 patients was included in this study. Of them, 180 (30.5%) had favorable outcomes and 152 (25.8%) had miserable outcomes. All selected machine learning models outperformed the DRAGON score on accuracy of outcome prediction (Logistic Regression: 0.70, Supportive Vector Machine: 0.67, Random Forest: 0.69, and Extreme Gradient Boosting: 0.67, vs. DRAGON: 0.51, < 0.001). Among all selected models, Logistic Regression also had a better performance than the DRAGON score on positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. Compared with the DRAGON score, the multiclass machine learning approach showed better performance on the prediction of the 3-month functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients requiring reperfusion therapy.

摘要

预测缺血性中风患者的功能预后有助于临床决策。以往的研究大多详细阐述了对良好预后的预测。在进行进一步的侵入性干预之前,也应考虑通常被定义为改良Rankin量表(mRS)5 - 6级的悲惨预后。通过使用机器学习算法,我们旨在开发一种多类分类模型,用于预测需要再灌注治疗的急性缺血性中风患者的预后。这是一项在台湾一家中风医疗中心进行的回顾性研究。纳入了2016年1月至2019年12月期间就诊且符合再灌注治疗条件的急性缺血性中风患者。临床结局分为良好结局、中等结局和悲惨结局。我们开发了四种不同的多类机器学习模型(逻辑回归、支持向量机、随机森林和极端梯度提升)来预测临床结局,并将它们的性能与DRAGON评分进行比较。本研究纳入了590例患者样本。其中,180例(30.5%)有良好结局,152例(25.8%)有悲惨结局。所有选定的机器学习模型在结局预测准确性方面均优于DRAGON评分(逻辑回归:0.70,支持向量机:0.67,随机森林:0.69,极端梯度提升:0.67,vs. DRAGON:0.51,<0.001)。在所有选定模型中,逻辑回归在阳性预测值、敏感性和特异性方面也比DRAGON评分表现更好。与DRAGON评分相比,多类机器学习方法在预测需要再灌注治疗的急性缺血性中风患者3个月功能结局方面表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/76dd2965efa0/diagnostics-11-00080-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/c75083b599f1/diagnostics-11-00080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/411341530ac4/diagnostics-11-00080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/76dd2965efa0/diagnostics-11-00080-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/c75083b599f1/diagnostics-11-00080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/411341530ac4/diagnostics-11-00080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/7825282/76dd2965efa0/diagnostics-11-00080-g003a.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a Multiclass Machine Learning Model to Predict the Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Requiring Reperfusion Therapy.使用多类机器学习模型预测需要再灌注治疗的急性缺血性卒中的预后。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;11(1):80. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010080.
2
Prediction of Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of the CT-DRAGON Score and a Reduced Features Set.急性缺血性卒中后功能结局的预测:CT-DRAGON评分与简化特征集的比较
Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 31;11:718. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00718. eCollection 2020.
3
Machine Learning-Based Three-Month Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single Cerebrovascular-Specialty Hospital Study in South Korea.基于机器学习的急性缺血性卒中三个月预后预测:韩国一家脑血管专科医院的研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;11(10):1909. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101909.
4
Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke.基于机器学习的急性脑卒中结局预测模型。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1263-1265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293.
5
Predicting 6-Month Unfavorable Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测急性缺血性中风6个月不良结局
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 19;11:539509. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.539509. eCollection 2020.
6
Functional Outcome Prediction in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Regression Models.缺血性中风的功能预后预测:机器学习算法与回归模型的比较
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 25;11:889. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00889. eCollection 2020.
7
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Influential Factors of Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Registry-Based Study.用于预测急性缺血性卒中早期预后影响因素的机器学习模型:基于登记处的研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 25;10(3):e32508. doi: 10.2196/32508.
8
Predicting 3-month poor functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in young patients using machine learning.使用机器学习预测年轻急性缺血性脑卒中患者 3 个月的不良功能结局。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Oct 10;29(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02056-3.
9
Predicting Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Potential Value of Machine Learning Algorithms.预测急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的结果:机器学习算法的潜在价值
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 25;9:784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00784. eCollection 2018.
10
A Machine Learning Approach to First Pass Reperfusion in Mechanical Thrombectomy: Prediction and Feature Analysis.机器学习在机械取栓中首次再灌注的应用:预测和特征分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jul;30(7):105796. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105796. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive outcome of late window ischemic stroke patients following endovascular therapy: a multi-center study.血管内治疗后晚期窗缺血性卒中患者的预测结局:一项多中心研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1489714. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1489714. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning-based prediction of coronary care unit readmission: A multihospital validation study.基于机器学习的冠心病监护病房再入院预测:一项多医院验证研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 30;10:20552076241277030. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277030. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Development and validation of outcome prediction model for reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke using nomogram and machine learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry.利用全国性疾病登记系统评估机器学习方法对脑卒中结局的预测。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jul;190:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105381. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
Deep Learning in the Prediction of Ischaemic Stroke Thrombolysis Functional Outcomes: A Pilot Study.深度学习在预测缺血性卒中溶栓功能结局中的应用:一项初步研究。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(2):e19-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke.
应用列线图和机器学习建立急性缺血性脑卒中再灌注治疗结局预测模型的开发和验证。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3255-3266. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07329-7. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
4
Prognostic estimation for acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy within an extended therapeutic window using an interpretable machine learning model.使用可解释机器学习模型对在延长治疗窗内行机械取栓术的急性缺血性卒中患者进行预后评估。
Front Neuroinform. 2023 Oct 13;17:1273827. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1273827. eCollection 2023.
5
Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性中风患者运动功能的机器学习预测:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 13;14:1039794. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1039794. eCollection 2023.
6
Machine learning-based prediction of clinical outcomes after first-ever ischemic stroke.基于机器学习对首次缺血性卒中后临床结局的预测
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1114360. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1114360. eCollection 2023.
7
Machine learning based outcome prediction of large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation prior to thrombectomy in patients with wake-up stroke.基于机器学习的醒后卒中患者取栓前前循环大血管闭塞的预后预测。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug;30(4):480-488. doi: 10.1177/15910199221135695. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Dynamic Prediction of Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对急性缺血性中风患者机械取栓结果进行动态预测
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):938. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070938.
基于机器学习的急性脑卒中结局预测模型。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1263-1265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293.
4
Predicting Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Potential Value of Machine Learning Algorithms.预测急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的结果:机器学习算法的潜在价值
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 25;9:784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00784. eCollection 2018.
5
Using Machine Learning to Improve the Prediction of Functional Outcome in Ischemic Stroke Patients.运用机器学习改善缺血性脑卒中患者功能预后预测。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 Nov-Dec;15(6):1953-1959. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2811471. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家发病率、患病率以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2016 年 328 种疾病和伤害导致的残疾年数:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
7
Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域和国家249种死因的预期寿命、全死因死亡率和死因别死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
8
ASTRAL, DRAGON and SEDAN scores predict stroke outcome more accurately than physicians.ASTRA、DRAGON 和 SEDAN 评分预测卒中结局比医生更准确。
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1651-1657. doi: 10.1111/ene.13100. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中的血管内血栓切除术:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1832-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13767.
10
Introduction to machine learning.机器学习导论
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1107:105-28. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_7.