• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后天培养可能等同于先天禀赋:警示故事与建议解决方案。

Nurture might be nature: cautionary tales and proposed solutions.

作者信息

Hart Sara A, Little Callie, van Bergen Elsje

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Learn. 2021 Jan 8;6(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00079-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41539-020-00079-z
PMID:33420086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7794571/
Abstract

Across a wide range of studies, researchers often conclude that the home environment and children's outcomes are causally linked. In contrast, behavioral genetic studies show that parents influence their children by providing them with both environment and genes, meaning the environment that parents provide should not be considered in the absence of genetic influences, because that can lead to erroneous conclusions on causation. This article seeks to provide behavioral scientists with a synopsis of numerous methods to estimate the direct effect of the environment, controlling for the potential of genetic confounding. Ideally, using genetically sensitive designs can fully disentangle this genetic confound, but these require specialized samples. In the near future, researchers will likely have access to measured DNA variants (summarized in a polygenic scores), which could serve as a partial genetic control, but that is currently not an option that is ideal or widely available. We also propose a work around for when genetically sensitive data are not readily available: the Familial Control Method. In this method, one measures the same trait in the parents as the child, and the parents' trait is then used as a covariate (e.g., a genetic proxy). When these options are all not possible, we plead with our colleagues to clearly mention genetic confound as a limitation, and to be cautious with any environmental causal statements which could lead to unnecessary parent blaming.

摘要

在广泛的研究中,研究人员常常得出家庭环境与儿童成长结果存在因果关系的结论。相比之下,行为遗传学研究表明,父母通过为孩子提供环境和基因来影响他们,这意味着在没有遗传影响的情况下,不应考虑父母提供的环境,因为这可能导致关于因果关系的错误结论。本文旨在为行为科学家提供一系列方法的概述,以估计环境的直接影响,同时控制遗传混杂的可能性。理想情况下,使用基因敏感设计可以完全消除这种遗传混杂,但这需要专门的样本。在不久的将来,研究人员可能会获得测量的DNA变异(以多基因分数汇总),这可以作为部分遗传控制,但目前这不是一个理想或广泛可用的选择。我们还提出了一种在基因敏感数据不易获得时的变通方法:家族对照法。在这种方法中,测量父母与孩子相同的特质,然后将父母的特质用作协变量(例如,遗传代理)。当这些选择都不可行时,我们恳请同事们明确将遗传混杂作为一个局限性提及,并对任何可能导致不必要的指责父母的环境因果陈述持谨慎态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/b6c5e408d4fe/41539_2020_79_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/4f9fd90b6302/41539_2020_79_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/6112a4cf2b3d/41539_2020_79_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/0a315c843b9d/41539_2020_79_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/ee196ec38deb/41539_2020_79_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/b81bec77d290/41539_2020_79_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/fba64f5930bf/41539_2020_79_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/65700b134864/41539_2020_79_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/ef237cd2550f/41539_2020_79_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/b6c5e408d4fe/41539_2020_79_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/4f9fd90b6302/41539_2020_79_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/6112a4cf2b3d/41539_2020_79_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/0a315c843b9d/41539_2020_79_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/ee196ec38deb/41539_2020_79_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/b81bec77d290/41539_2020_79_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/fba64f5930bf/41539_2020_79_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/65700b134864/41539_2020_79_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/ef237cd2550f/41539_2020_79_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9041/7794571/b6c5e408d4fe/41539_2020_79_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nurture might be nature: cautionary tales and proposed solutions.后天培养可能等同于先天禀赋:警示故事与建议解决方案。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2021 Jan 8;6(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00079-z.
2
Estimation of Parental Effects Using Polygenic Scores.利用多基因分数估计父母效应。
Behav Genet. 2021 May;51(3):264-278. doi: 10.1007/s10519-020-10032-w. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight.影响食物摄入行为控制发展及儿童超重的家庭环境因素。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;48(4):893-907. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70347-3.
4
How important are parents in the development of child anxiety and depression? A genomic analysis of parent-offspring trios in the Norwegian Mother Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).父母在儿童焦虑和抑郁的发展中有多重要?挪威母亲-父亲-儿童队列研究(MoBa)中亲子三组成员的基因组分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 27;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01760-1.
5
Body mass index and childhood symptoms of depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A within-family Mendelian randomization study.体质指数与儿童期抑郁、焦虑和注意缺陷多动障碍症状:基于家系的孟德尔随机化研究。
Elife. 2022 Dec 20;11:e74320. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74320.
6
The estimation of environmental and genetic parental influences.对环境和遗传亲代影响的评估。
Dev Psychopathol. 2022 Dec;34(5):1876-1886. doi: 10.1017/S0954579422000761. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Parent-mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome.家长介导的干预措施对促进唐氏综合征幼儿的沟通和语言发展的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 15;10(10):CD012089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012089.pub2.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
10
The nature of nurture: disentangling passive genotype-environment correlation from family relationship influences on children's externalizing problems.教养的本质:厘清被动的基因型-环境相关性与家庭关系对儿童外化问题的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Feb;27(1):12-21. doi: 10.1037/a0031190.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling multivariate relationships between cognition, language and social traits: structures of G, E, and .理清认知、语言和社会特质之间的多变量关系:G、E和……的结构
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 29:2025.07.26.666154. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.26.666154.
2
No effect of additional education on long-term brain structure, a preregistered natural experiment in thousands of individuals.额外教育对长期大脑结构无影响,一项针对数千人的预注册自然实验。
Elife. 2025 Jul 25;13:RP101526. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101526.
3
Polygenic Scores of Executive Function Provide Limited Support for Genetic Confounding With Socio-Economic Measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotypic Annotation: Using Polygenic Scores to Translate Discoveries From Genome-Wide Association Studies From the Top Down.表型注释:利用多基因评分从基因组全关联研究的发现进行自上而下的转化。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;28(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0963721418807729. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
2
Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.通过家系内分析避免孟德尔随机化中的家族性、选择性交配和群体分层偏倚。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 14;11(1):3519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4.
3
Intergenerational Transmission of Education and ADHD: Effects of Parental Genotypes.
执行功能的多基因评分对与社会经济指标的基因混杂提供的支持有限。
Genes Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;24(4):e70030. doi: 10.1111/gbb.70030.
4
Longitudinal trajectories of brain development from infancy to school age and their relationship with literacy development.从婴儿期到学龄期大脑发育的纵向轨迹及其与读写能力发展的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 17;122(24):e2414598122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2414598122. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
Twin modelling reveals partly distinct genetic pathways to music enjoyment.双胞胎模型揭示了通往音乐享受的部分不同遗传途径。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 25;16(1):2904. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58123-8.
6
The intergenerational impact of mothers and fathers on children's word reading development.母亲和父亲对孩子单词阅读发展的代际影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;66(7):946-955. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14107. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
7
Language aptitude is related to the anatomy of the transverse temporal gyri.语言能力与颞横回的解剖结构有关。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Dec 19;230(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02883-4.
8
Causal and common risk pathways linking childhood maltreatment to later intimate partner violence victimization.将童年期虐待与后期亲密伴侣暴力受害联系起来的因果及共同风险路径。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 May;30(5):2027-2037. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02813-0. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
9
Developmental cascades from maternal depressive symptoms in childhood to adolescents' friendship quality: A 13-year longitudinal study.从童年期母亲的抑郁症状到青少年友谊质量的发展级联效应:一项为期13年的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1037/dev0001834.
10
Predicting Adolescent Arithmetic and Reading Dysfluency.预测青少年算术和阅读不流畅问题。
J Learn Disabil. 2025 May-Jun;58(3):163-178. doi: 10.1177/00222194241275644. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
代际传递的教育与 ADHD:父母基因型的影响。
Behav Genet. 2020 Jul;50(4):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s10519-020-09992-w. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.群体内多基因评分的预测准确性存在差异。
Elife. 2020 Jan 30;9:e48376. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48376.
5
Genetic nature or genetic nurture? Introducing social genetic parameters to quantify bias in polygenic score analyses.遗传天性还是遗传培育?引入社会遗传参数以量化多基因评分分析中的偏差。
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2018 Jul-Sep;64(3-4):187-215. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2019.1681257.
6
Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status.从基因组测量和社会经济地位预测教育成就。
Dev Sci. 2020 May;23(3):e12925. doi: 10.1111/desc.12925. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Using DNA From Mothers and Children to Study Parental Investment in Children's Educational Attainment.利用母亲和孩子的 DNA 研究父母对孩子教育成就的投资。
Child Dev. 2020 Sep;91(5):1745-1761. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13329. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
8
What Is the Causal Interpretation of Sibling Comparison Designs?同胞比较设计的因果解释是什么?
Epidemiology. 2020 Jan;31(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001108.
9
The role of parental genotype in predicting offspring years of education: evidence for genetic nurture.父母基因型在预测子女受教育年限中的作用:遗传教养的证据。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;26(8):3896-3904. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0494-1. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Comparing Within- and Between-Family Polygenic Score Prediction.比较家内和家间多基因评分预测。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 1;105(2):351-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 11.