Suppr超能文献

健康老龄化面向所有人?认知功能与老龄化研究 I 和 II 中二十年来健康期望寿命的社会经济不平等比较。

Healthy ageing for all? Comparisons of socioeconomic inequalities in health expectancies over two decades in the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies I and II.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 9;50(3):841-851. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa271.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing life expectancy (LE), cross-sectional data show widening inequalities in disability-free LE (DFLE) by socioeconomic status (SES) in many countries. We use longitudinal data to better understand trends in DFLE and years independent (IndLE) by SES, and how underlying transitions contribute.

METHODS

The Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and II) are large population-based studies of those aged ≥65 years in three English centres (Newcastle, Nottingham, Cambridgeshire), with baseline around 1991 (CFAS I, n = 7635) and 2011 (CFAS II, n = 7762) and 2-year follow-up. We defined disability as difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), dependency by combining ADLs and cognition reflecting care required, and SES by area-level deprivation. Transitions between disability or dependency states and death were estimated from multistate models.

RESULTS

Between 1991 and 2011, gains in DFLE at age 65 were greatest for the most advantaged men and women [men: 4.7 years, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.3-6.2; women: 2.8 years, 95% CI 1.3-4.3]. Gains were due to the most advantaged women having a reduced risk of incident disability [relative risk ratio (RRR):0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.8], whereas the most advantaged men had a greater likelihood of recovery (RRR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.2) and reduced disability-free mortality risk (RRR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6]. Risk of death from disability decreased for least advantaged men (RRR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9); least advantaged women showed little improvement in transitions. IndLE patterns across time were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention should target the most disadvantaged areas, to narrow inequalities, with clear indication from the most advantaged that reduction in poor transitions is achievable.

摘要

背景

尽管预期寿命(LE)不断延长,但许多国家的横断面数据显示,社会经济地位(SES)对无残疾预期寿命(DFLE)的不平等程度正在扩大。我们使用纵向数据更好地了解 SES 对 DFLE 和独立生活年限(IndLE)的趋势,以及潜在的转变如何发挥作用。

方法

认知功能与衰老研究(CFAS I 和 II)是在英国三个中心(纽卡斯尔、诺丁汉、剑桥郡)针对年龄在 65 岁及以上人群的大型基于人群的研究,基线时间分别为 1991 年(CFAS I,n=7635)和 2011 年(CFAS II,n=7762),随访时间为 2 年。我们将日常生活活动(ADL)困难、ADL 和认知相结合反映所需护理的依赖以及按地区贫困程度划分的 SES 定义为残疾。通过多状态模型估计从残疾或依赖状态到死亡的转变。

结果

在 1991 年至 2011 年间,最有利的男性和女性在 65 岁时的 DFLE 增益最大[男性:4.7 年,95%置信区间(95%CI)为 3.3-6.2;女性:2.8 年,95%CI 为 1.3-4.3]。增益是由于最有利的女性发生新发残疾的风险降低[相对风险比(RRR):0.7,95%CI 为 0.5-0.8],而最有利的男性更有可能康复(RRR:1.8,95%CI 为 1.0-3.2)和降低无残疾死亡率风险(RRR:0.4,95%CI 为 0.3-0.6]。最不利的男性残疾相关死亡率降低(RRR:0.7,95%CI 为 0.6-0.9);最不利的女性在转变方面几乎没有改善。随着时间的推移,IndLE 模式相似。

结论

预防应针对最不利的地区,以缩小不平等差距,最有利的地区明确表明,减少不良转变是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a0/8271204/3b9d76eef6b0/dyaa271f1.jpg

相似文献

4
Area-level socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living disability-free life expectancy in England: a modelling study.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025 Apr;6(4):100700. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100700. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
A comparison of health expectancies over two decades in England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II.
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):779-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00947-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
8
Drivers of inequality in disability-free expectancy at birth and age 85 across space and time in Great Britain.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Sep;68(9):826-33. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204083. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
9
Trends in Disability-Free Life Expectancy (DFLE) from 1995 to 2017 in the older Norwegian population by sex and education: The HUNT Study.
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Jul;50(5):542-551. doi: 10.1177/14034948211011796. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

2
Cohort trends in intrinsic capacity in England and China.
Nat Aging. 2025 Jan;5(1):87-98. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00741-w. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Is 70 the new 60? A longitudinal analysis of cohort trends inintrinsic capacity in England and China.
Res Sq. 2024 May 30:rs.3.rs-4271576. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4271576/v1.
10
Associations of Healthy Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Status with Cognitive Function in U.S. Older Adults.
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 28:2023.01.24.23284961. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.24.23284961.

本文引用的文献

2
Social inequalities in multimorbidity, frailty, disability, and transitions to mortality: a 24-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e42-e50. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30226-9. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Progress against inequalities in mortality: register-based study of 15 European countries between 1990 and 2015.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;34(12):1131-1142. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00580-9. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
Longer and healthier lives for all? Successes and failures of a universal consumer-driven healthcare system, Switzerland, 1990-2014.
Int J Public Health. 2019 Nov;64(8):1173-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01290-5. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5677-1.
7
Are Differences in Disability-Free Life Expectancy by Gender, Race, and Education Widening at Older Ages?
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014 Jun;34(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11113-014-9337-6. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
8
Decennial trends and inequalities in healthy life expectancy: The HUNT Study, Norway.
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(1):124-131. doi: 10.1177/1403494817695911. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
9
Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS).
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1676-1684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31575-1. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Persistent social inequality in life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy: Outlook for a differential pension age in Denmark?
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jun;45(4):459-462. doi: 10.1177/1403494816683591. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验