• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁裔政治态度:神话与误解

Latino Political Attitudes: Myths and Misconceptions.

作者信息

Morales Albert, Rodriguez Claudia L, Schaller Thomas F

机构信息

University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.

出版信息

Society. 2020;57(6):693-697. doi: 10.1007/s12115-020-00546-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12115-020-00546-8
PMID:33424057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786853/
Abstract

The Latino population explosion is changing the electoral calculus in American politics. But Latino voters are often misunderstood, their heterogeneity underappreciated, the importance of their religious identities overstated, and their political clout ignored because of geographic concentration. In this article, we address these widely held misconceptions.

摘要

拉丁裔人口的激增正在改变美国政治中的选举格局。但拉丁裔选民常常被误解,他们的多样性被低估,他们宗教身份的重要性被夸大,而且由于地域集中,他们的政治影响力也被忽视。在本文中,我们将探讨这些普遍存在的误解。

相似文献

1
Latino Political Attitudes: Myths and Misconceptions.拉丁裔政治态度:神话与误解
Society. 2020;57(6):693-697. doi: 10.1007/s12115-020-00546-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
3
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
4
Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?投票意向与选择:选民总是理性且经过深思熟虑的吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148643. eCollection 2016.
5
The Impact of Race and Ethnicity, Immigration, and Political Context on Participation in American Electoral Politics.种族与族裔、移民及政治背景对美国选举政治参与的影响。
Soc Forces. 2012;90(3). doi: 10.1093/sf/sor024.
6
How "Us" and "Them" Relates to Voting Behavior-Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice.“我们”与“他们”如何与投票行为相关——社会结构、社会身份认同与选举选择
Comp Polit Stud. 2021 Oct;54(12):2087-2122. doi: 10.1177/0010414021997504. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
7
The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.1980年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):231-8.
8
Stuck between a rock and a hard place: The relationship between Latino/a's personal connections to immigrants and issue salience and presidential approval.进退两难:拉丁裔与移民的个人联系、议题显著性和总统支持率之间的关系
Polit Groups Identities. 2015;3(3):454-468. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2015.1050415.
9
Competing for the same value segments? Insight into the volatile Dutch political landscape.争夺相同的价值细分市场?洞察动荡的荷兰政治格局。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190598. eCollection 2018.
10
Old Voters on New Dimensions: Why Do Voters Vote for Pensioners' Parties? The Case of the Netherlands.老年选民的新维度:选民为何投票给养老金领取者政党?以荷兰为例。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-47. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1363589. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits and concerns of expanded carrier screening: what do pregnant Latina women in Texas think?扩大携带者筛查的益处与担忧:德克萨斯州的拉丁裔孕妇怎么看?
J Community Genet. 2023 Dec;14(6):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00676-6. Epub 2023 Oct 14.