Marantz P R, Tobin J N, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Steingart R M, Wexler J P, Budner N, Lense L, Wachspress J
Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467.
Circulation. 1988 Mar;77(3):607-12. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.3.607.
There is no uniformly accepted clinical definition for congestive heart failure (CHF), although criteria have been published by various groups. There is also no reference standard for CHF, although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) gives a quantitative assessment of systolic function and is useful in predicting prognosis. To determine the relationship between LVEF and clinically diagnosed CHF, we compared resting LVEF determined by radionuclide ventriculography with diagnosis of CHF by clinical criteria in 407 patients, based on clinical data collected by a cardiology fellow. Of 153 patients with a low LVEF (less than or equal to 0.40), 30 (20%) met none of the criteria for CHF. Conversely, of 204 patients with normal LVEF (greater than or equal to 0.50), 105 (51%) met at least one of the criteria. We conclude that different criteria for CHF will have varying utility depending on the population being examined, and that a combination of clinical features and an objective measure of cardiac performance is needed to diagnose CHF.
虽然不同组织已公布了充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的标准,但目前尚无统一公认的CHF临床定义。CHF也没有参考标准,尽管左心室射血分数(LVEF)能对收缩功能进行定量评估且有助于预测预后。为确定LVEF与临床诊断的CHF之间的关系,我们根据一位心脏病学研究员收集的临床数据,将通过放射性核素心室造影测定的静息LVEF与407例患者依据临床标准诊断的CHF进行了比较。在153例LVEF较低(小于或等于0.40)的患者中,30例(20%)不符合任何CHF标准。相反,在204例LVEF正常(大于或等于0.50)的患者中,105例(51%)至少符合一项标准。我们得出结论,CHF的不同标准在不同受检人群中的效用各异,诊断CHF需要结合临床特征和心脏功能的客观测量指标。