• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状病毒的生命政治:法国福柯遗产的悖论。

Coronavirus biopolitics: the paradox of France's Foucauldian heritage.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Avenue de Beaumont 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Jan 11;43(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2
PMID:33428008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7799166/
Abstract

In this short paper we analyse some paradoxical aspects of France's Foucauldian heritage: (1) while several French scholars claim the COVID-19 pandemic is a perfect example of what Foucault called biopolitics, popular reaction instead suggests a biopolitical failure on the part of the government; (2) One of these failures concerns the government's inability to produce reliable biostatistical data, especially regarding health inequalities in relation to COVID-19. We interrogate whether Foucaldianism contributed, in the past as well today, towards a certain myopia in France regarding biostatistics and its relation to social inequalities in health. One might ask whether this very data could provide an appropriate response to the Foucauldian question: What kind of governance of life is the pandemic revealing to us?

摘要

在这篇简短的论文中,我们分析了法国福柯遗产中一些自相矛盾的方面:(1)尽管一些法国学者声称 COVID-19 大流行是福柯所谓的生物政治学的完美例子,但公众的反应反而表明政府在生物政治方面的失败;(2)这些失败之一涉及政府无法提供可靠的生物统计学数据,特别是关于与 COVID-19 相关的健康不平等问题。我们质疑福柯主义是否在过去和今天都导致了法国在生物统计学及其与健康不平等的关系方面的某种短视。人们可能会问,这些数据是否可以为福柯的问题提供适当的答案:这场大流行向我们揭示了什么样的生命治理?

相似文献

1
Coronavirus biopolitics: the paradox of France's Foucauldian heritage.冠状病毒的生命政治:法国福柯遗产的悖论。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Jan 11;43(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2.
2
Immunitarianism: defence and sacrifice in the politics of Covid-19.免疫主义:新冠政治中的防御与牺牲。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Feb 22;43(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00384-9.
3
France's response to the Covid-19 pandemic: between a rock and a hard place.法国应对新冠疫情:进退维谷。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jan;17(1):14-26. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000165. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,哪些生命值得拯救?生物合法性与减少伤害。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12417. doi: 10.1111/nin.12417. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
[Pandemics, Politics and Science: the Role of Science and Scientifics for the Solution of the COVID-19 Pandemic Conflicts].[大流行、政治与科学:科学及科学家在解决新冠疫情冲突中的作用]
Cuad Bioet. 2020 May-Aug;31(102):151-165. doi: 10.30444/CB.59.
6
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与卫生不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
7
[The current state of healthcare provision: Between inequalities in access to care and new systemic measures].
Rev Infirm. 2024 May;73(301):16-18. doi: 10.1016/j.revinf.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.在 COVID-19 大流行中集中和分散治理:信用和责任的政治。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Considering social inequalities in health in COVID-19 response: insights from a French case study.新冠疫情应对中健康方面的社会不平等问题:来自法国案例研究的见解
Health Promot Int. 2023 Feb 1;38(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac173.
10
French immigration policy since May 1981.自1981年5月以来的法国移民政策。
Int Migr Rev. 1983 Summer;17(2):196-211.

引用本文的文献

1
What can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic? Resilience for the future and neuropsychopedagogical insights.我们能从新冠疫情中学到什么?对未来的适应能力和神经心理教育学见解。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:993991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993991. eCollection 2022.
2
Refugee's agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: ethnographic perspectives.新冠疫情期间难民营中难民的机构与应对策略:人种志视角
Comp Migr Stud. 2022;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Status syndrome: a challenge to medicine.《地位综合征:对医学的挑战》
JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1304-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1304.
2
Reappraising Foucault. [Review of: Davidson AI, ed. Foucault and his interlocutors. University of Chicago Press, 1997; Foucault M. "Il faut défendre la sociéé: Cours au Collège de France, 1976. Paris, 1997].重新审视福柯。[评:戴维森 AI 编,《福柯及其对话者》,芝加哥大学出版社,1997 年;福柯 M,《必须保卫社会:1976 年法兰西学院课程》,巴黎,1997 年]
AJS. 1998 Mar;103(5):1402-10. doi: 10.1086/231356.