• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间难民营中难民的机构与应对策略:人种志视角

Refugee's agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: ethnographic perspectives.

作者信息

Böhme Claudia, Schmitz Anett

机构信息

University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, 54296 Trier, Germany.

出版信息

Comp Migr Stud. 2022;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3
PMID:36039340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9402277/
Abstract

The global spread of the coronavirus pandemic has particularly dramatic consequences for the lives of migrants and refugees living in already marginalised and restricted conditions, whose ongoing crisis is at risk of being overlooked. But refugees are not only extremely vulnerable and at risk of infection, as several reports show, quickly develop their own protection measures like the production of hygienic products, the publication of their situation and calls for action and help. Therefore, this paper aims to research the effects of the coronavirus crisis on refugees in camp settings with a special ethnographic focus on how refugees actively deal with this crisis and if they, through already developed resilience, are capable of adapting to the restrictions as well as inventing strategies to cope with the difficult situation. To account for the variety of refugee camps as well as the different living conditions due to their locality, history and national asylum politics, we will look at three different locations, namely refugee asylum homes in Germany, hotspots on the Greek islands as well as one refugee camp in Kenya. The main questions will be how, under structurally and institutionally framed conditions of power and victimisation in refugee camps, forms of agency are established, made possible or limited. The goal is to show which strategies refugees apply to cope with the enhanced restrictions and exclusion, how they act to protect themselves and others from the virus and how they present and reflect their situation during the coronavirus pandemic. Finally, this discussion offers a new perspective to consider refugees not only as vulnerable victims, but also as actively engaged individuals.

摘要

冠状病毒大流行的全球蔓延对生活在已然边缘化和受限条件下的移民和难民的生活产生了尤为显著的影响,他们持续面临的危机有被忽视的风险。但正如几份报告所示,难民不仅极其脆弱且有感染风险,他们还迅速制定了自己的保护措施,比如生产卫生用品、公布自身状况并呼吁采取行动和提供帮助。因此,本文旨在研究冠状病毒危机对难民营中难民的影响,特别从人种志角度关注难民如何积极应对这场危机,以及他们是否凭借已形成的适应能力,能够适应这些限制并想出应对艰难处境的策略。考虑到难民营种类繁多,以及由于其地理位置、历史和国家庇护政策导致的不同生活条件,我们将考察三个不同地点,即德国的难民收容所、希腊诸岛的热点地区以及肯尼亚的一个难民营。主要问题将是,在难民营中权力和受害状况在结构和制度上既定框架的条件下,能动性的形式是如何确立、成为可能或受到限制的。目标是展示难民运用哪些策略来应对强化了的限制和排斥,他们如何采取行动保护自己和他人免受病毒侵害,以及他们在冠状病毒大流行期间如何呈现和反思自己的处境。最后,这场讨论提供了一个新视角,不仅将难民视为易受伤害的受害者,也将他们视为积极参与其中的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/cb7ff148fd6c/40878_2022_302_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/f5a063f5e8e1/40878_2022_302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/da079cec6ca9/40878_2022_302_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/cb7ff148fd6c/40878_2022_302_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/f5a063f5e8e1/40878_2022_302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/da079cec6ca9/40878_2022_302_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f10/9402277/cb7ff148fd6c/40878_2022_302_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Refugee's agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: ethnographic perspectives.新冠疫情期间难民营中难民的机构与应对策略:人种志视角
Comp Migr Stud. 2022;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Mental health consequences of long-term stays in refugee camps: preliminary evidence from Moria.难民营中长期滞留的心理后果:来自莫里亚的初步证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11301-x.
3
72 Years of Homemaking in Waiting Zones: Lebanon's "Permanently Temporary" Palestinian Refugee Camps.在等待区度过的72年持家岁月:黎巴嫩“永久临时”的巴勒斯坦难民营
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 26;5:587063. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.587063. eCollection 2020.
4
Exploring sources of insecurity for Ethiopian Oromo and Somali women who have given birth in Kakuma Refugee Camp: A Qualitative Study.探讨在卡卡乌难民营分娩的埃塞俄比亚奥罗莫族和索马里族妇女感到不安全的原因:一项定性研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 24;17(3):e1003066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003066. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on refugees and asylum seekers in Greece: A retrospective analysis of national surveillance data from 2020.新冠疫情对希腊难民和寻求庇护者的影响:对2020年国家监测数据的回顾性分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 1;37:100958. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100958. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Refugee health and physiological profiles in transitional settlements in Serbia and Kenya: Comparative evidence for effects of gender and social support.塞尔维亚和肯尼亚过渡性定居点的难民健康和生理特征:性别和社会支持影响的比较证据。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 Jul;165:107024. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107024. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Responses to intimate partner violence in Kakuma refugee camp: refugee interactions with agency systems.卡卡马难民营中对亲密伴侣暴力的反应:难民与机构系统的互动。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.036. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
Refugees and Covid-19: Beyond Health Risks to Insecurity.难民与新冠疫情:超越健康风险,关乎安全无保障
Schweiz Z Polit. 2021 Jun;27(2):353-368. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12466. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
9
Seasonal patterns of communicable disease incidence and antibiotic prescribing in Moria refugee camp, Greece.希腊莫里亚难民营传染病发病率和抗生素处方的季节性模式。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Feb 23;46(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad212.
10
Maternity care for refugees living in Greek refugee camps: What are the challenges to provision?为居住在希腊难民营的难民提供孕产妇保健服务:在提供服务方面存在哪些挑战?
Birth. 2021 Mar;48(1):114-121. doi: 10.1111/birt.12522. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
(Over)crowded house: exploring asylum seekers' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic while living at accommodation centers in Sweden.过度拥挤的住所:探索在瑞典住宿中心居住的寻求庇护者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18089-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus biopolitics: the paradox of France's Foucauldian heritage.冠状病毒的生命政治:法国福柯遗产的悖论。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Jan 11;43(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2.