School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10 Wallsend NSW, Newcastle, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Corporación Actuemos, Santiago, Chile.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 11;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01046-y.
The overarching objective was to examine the effectiveness of intervention strategies to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. To do this, systematic review evidence regarding the effects of intervention strategies was synthesized; organized, where appropriate, by the setting in which the strategies were implemented. Additionally, we sought to describe gaps in the review of evidence; that is, where evidence regarding the effectiveness of recommended policy actions had not been systematically synthesised.
We undertook a systematic search of electronic databases and the grey literature to identify systematic reviews describing the effects of any intervention strategy targeting fruit and/or vegetable intake in children or adults of any age.
The effects of 32 intervention strategies were synthesised from the 19 included reviews. The strategies were mapped across all three broad domains of the NOURISHING framework (i.e. food environment, food system and behaviour change communication), but covered just 14 of the framework's 65 sub-policy areas. There was evidence supporting the effectiveness of 19 of the 32 intervention strategies. The findings of the umbrella review suggest that intervention strategies implemented within schools, childcare services, homes, workplaces and primary care can be effective, as can eHealth strategies, mass media campaigns, household food production strategies and fiscal interventions.
A range of effective strategy options are available for policy makers and practitioners interested in improving fruit and/or vegetable intake. However, the effects of many strategies - particularly those targeting agricultural production practices, the supply chain and the broader food system - have not been reported in systematic reviews. Primary studies assessing the effects of these strategies, and the inclusion of such studies in systematic reviews, are needed to better inform national and international efforts to improve public health nutrition.
The review protocol was deposited in a publicly available Open Science framework prior to execution of the search strategy. https://osf.io/unj7x/.
本研究的总体目标是检验促进水果和蔬菜消费的干预策略的有效性。为此,我们对干预策略效果的系统评价证据进行了综合分析;并根据实施策略的环境进行了适当的组织。此外,我们还试图描述证据综述中的空白;也就是说,关于推荐政策行动有效性的证据尚未系统地综合。
我们对电子数据库和灰色文献进行了系统搜索,以确定描述任何针对儿童或任何年龄段成年人的水果和/或蔬菜摄入量的干预策略效果的系统评价。
从纳入的 19 项综述中综合了 32 项干预策略的效果。这些策略被映射到了 NOURISHING 框架的所有三个广泛领域(即食物环境、食物系统和行为改变传播),但仅涵盖了该框架 65 个子政策领域中的 14 个。有证据支持 32 项干预策略中的 19 项的有效性。伞式综述的结果表明,在学校、儿童保育服务机构、家庭、工作场所和初级保健机构实施的干预策略可以是有效的,电子健康策略、大众媒体运动、家庭粮食生产策略和财政干预措施也可以是有效的。
对于有兴趣提高水果和/或蔬菜摄入量的政策制定者和实践者来说,有一系列有效的策略可供选择。然而,许多策略的效果——特别是针对农业生产实践、供应链和更广泛的食物系统的策略——尚未在系统评价中报告。需要进行评估这些策略效果的原始研究,并将这些研究纳入系统评价,以便更好地为改善公共卫生营养的国家和国际努力提供信息。
在执行搜索策略之前,该综述方案已在一个公开的科学框架中进行了注册。https://osf.io/unj7x/。