Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Geography, Planning, and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Environ Manage. 2021 May;67(5):901-919. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01404-3. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Who worries first about an invasive alien species: scientists or the general public, or do both become concerned simultaneously? Taking thirteen invasive alien species in the Netherlands, this article reconstructs the development of their public and scientific salience: the attention they attracted and the knowledge about them. Salience was assessed from the number of publications from 1997 onwards in the LexisNexis newspaper database and Scopus scientific database. Three trajectories were derived for a species to move from being a latent problem with low salience toward a manifest status with high public and scientific salience. In the most common trajectory, scientific salience increased first, followed by an increase in public salience. We probed the merit of this concept of trajectories by examining the action undertaken for a representative species of the trajectories. We assigned each of these three species a code for inertia and inaction based on the content of a hundred newspaper articles and all available government documents. Knowing the scientific and public salience of these species clarifies why the actions to deal with them differed even though from an ecological perspective they warranted similar attention. The typology of public and scientific salience and the problem trajectories developed in this article together offer a structured approach for understanding an invasive alien species and provide pointers for engaging a community in managing that species.
是科学家还是公众,还是两者同时开始关注?本文以荷兰的 13 种入侵外来物种为例,重建了它们在公众和科学界的显著程度的发展:它们所引起的关注以及人们对它们的了解。显著性是通过 1997 年以来 LexisNexis 报纸数据库和 Scopus 科学数据库中的出版物数量来评估的。对于一个物种来说,有三种轨迹可以从潜在问题的低显著性发展到具有高公众和科学显著性的明显状态。在最常见的轨迹中,科学显著性首先增加,然后公众显著性增加。我们通过检查代表轨迹的物种的行动来探究这些轨迹概念的优点。我们根据一百篇新闻文章和所有可用的政府文件的内容,为这三种物种中的每一种分配了惰性和不作为的代码。了解这些物种的科学和公众显著性可以清楚地解释为什么尽管从生态角度来看,它们需要类似的关注,但处理这些物种的行动却有所不同。本文中提出的公众和科学显著性的类型学和问题轨迹为理解入侵外来物种提供了一种结构化的方法,并为让社区参与管理该物种提供了一些指导。