Baxter Andrew J, Dundas Ruth, Popham Frank, Craig Peter
MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.
MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113685. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113685. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Teenage pregnancy is associated with numerous health risks, both to mothers and infants, and may contribute to entrenched social inequalities. In countries with high rates of teenage pregnancy there is disagreement on effective action to reduce rates. England's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, which cost £280 million over its ten year implementation period, has been highlighted as an effective way of reducing pregnancies after rates fell by more than 50% from 1998 to 2014 and widely advocated as a replicable model for other countries. However, it is not clear whether the fall is attributable to the strategy or to background trends and other events. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy on pregnancy and birth rates using comparators. We compared under-18 pregnancy rates in England with Scotland and Wales using interrupted time series methods. We compared under-18 birth rates and under-20 pregnancy rates in England with European and English-speaking high-income countries using synthetic control methods. In the controlled interrupted time series analyses, trends in rates of teenage pregnancy in England closely followed those in Scotland (0.08 fewer pregnancies per 1000 women per year in England; -0.74 to 0.59) and Wales (0.14 more pregnancies per 1000 women per year in England; -0.48 to 0.76). In synthetic control analyses, under-18 birth rates were very similar in England and the synthetic control. Under-20 pregnancy rates were marginally higher in England than control. Although teenage pregnancies and births in England fell following implementation of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, comparisons with other countries suggest the strategy had little, if any, effect on pregnancy rates. This raises doubts about whether the strategy should be used as a model for future public health interventions in countries aiming to reduce teenage pregnancy.
青少年怀孕对母亲和婴儿都有诸多健康风险,还可能加剧社会不平等现象。在青少年怀孕率较高的国家,对于降低怀孕率的有效措施存在分歧。英格兰的青少年怀孕战略在其十年实施期内花费了2.8亿英镑,自1998年至2014年怀孕率下降超过50%后,该战略被视为降低怀孕率的有效方式,并被广泛倡导为其他国家可复制的模式。然而,尚不清楚怀孕率的下降是该战略所致,还是受背景趋势及其他事件影响。我们旨在使用对照方法评估青少年怀孕战略对怀孕率和出生率的影响。我们采用中断时间序列方法,将英格兰18岁以下的怀孕率与苏格兰和威尔士进行比较。我们使用合成控制方法,将英格兰18岁以下的出生率和20岁以下的怀孕率与欧洲及英语国家的高收入国家进行比较。在对照中断时间序列分析中,英格兰青少年怀孕率的趋势与苏格兰(英格兰每年每1000名女性的怀孕数少0.08例;-0.74至0.59)和威尔士(英格兰每年每1000名女性的怀孕数多0.14例;-0.48至0.76)密切相关。在合成控制分析中,英格兰18岁以下的出生率与合成对照组非常相似。英格兰20岁以下的怀孕率略高于对照组。尽管英格兰实施青少年怀孕战略后青少年怀孕和生育有所下降,但与其他国家的比较表明,该战略对怀孕率几乎没有影响(即便有影响也微乎其微)。这引发了对于该战略是否应被用作旨在降低青少年怀孕率的国家未来公共卫生干预模式的质疑。