Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Isabel I, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Sports Sciences Department, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Melgaço, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020475.
Although asymmetries in lower limbs have been linked with players' performance in male soccer players, literature that has been published addressing female soccer is scarce. Thus, the aim of this study was twofold: (i) describe the asymmetries of women soccer players during jumping, change-of-direction and range-of-motion tests; and (ii) test possible relationships between asymmetries and injury risk in female soccer players. Sixteen female players (15.5 ± 1.5 years) performed a battery of fitness tests (i.e., jump ability, change-of-direction ability and passive range-of-motion) and muscle mass analysis via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, through which the specific asymmetry index and the related injury risk were calculated. Significant ( < 0.05) lower asymmetries in the change-of-direction test were observed in comparison to those observed in jumping and range-of-motion tests; significant ( < 0.05) lower asymmetries in muscle mass were also reported compared to those found in the change-of-direction and countermovement jump tests. Additionally, increased injury risk for countermovement jump and hip flexion with extended knee range-of-motion (relating to asymmetry values) and for ankle flexion with flexed knee range-of-motion in both legs (relating to reference range-of-motion values), as well as increased individual injury risk values, were observed across all tests. These findings suggest the necessity to implement individual approaches for asymmetry and injury risk analyses.
尽管下肢的不对称性与男性足球运动员的表现有关,但针对女足的相关文献却很少。因此,本研究旨在:(i)描述女足运动员在跳跃、变向和活动范围测试中的不对称性;(ii)测试女足运动员的不对称性与受伤风险之间的可能关系。16 名女运动员(15.5±1.5 岁)进行了一系列体能测试(即跳跃能力、变向能力和被动活动范围)和双能 X 射线吸收法肌肉质量分析,通过该方法计算出特定的不对称指数和相关的受伤风险。与跳跃和活动范围测试相比,变向测试的不对称性显著降低(<0.05);与变向和反向跳跃测试相比,肌肉质量的不对称性也显著降低(<0.05)。此外,在所有测试中,反向跳跃和髋关节伸展时膝关节活动范围增加(与不对称值有关)以及双侧踝关节弯曲时膝关节活动范围增加(与参考活动范围值有关)的受伤风险增加,以及个体受伤风险值增加,都被观察到。这些发现表明,需要针对不对称性和受伤风险分析实施个性化方法。