School of Science and the Environment, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NL A2H 5G4, Canada.
Forestry Economics Research Centre, Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, 46 Duc Thang ward, Northern Tu Liem District, Hanoi 11910, Vietnam.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020559.
The COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the most serious health crises in human history, spreading rapidly across the globe from January 2020 to the present. With prompt and drastic measures, Vietnam is one of the few countries that has largely succeeded in controlling the outbreak. This result is derived from a harmonious combination of many factors, with the policy system playing a key role. This study assessed the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam from the early days of the outbreak in January 2020 to 24 July 2020 (with a total of 413 cases confirmed and 99 days of no new cases infected from the local community) by synthesizing and evaluating 959 relevant policy documents in different classifications. The findings show that the Vietnamese policy system responded promptly, proactively, and effectively at multiple authority levels (33 different agencies from the national to provincial governments), using a range of policy tools and measures. Parallel to the daily occurrence of 2.24 new cases, 5.13 new policy documents were issued on average per day over the study period. The pandemic policy response over the first six months in Vietnam were divided into four periods, I (23 January-5 March), II (6-19 March), III (20 March-21 April), and IV (22 April-24 July). This paper synthesizes eight solution groups for these four anti-pandemic phases, including outbreak announcements and steering documents, medical measures, blockade of the schools, emergency responses, border and entry control measures, social isolation and nationwide social isolation measures, financial supports, and other measures. By emphasizing diversification of the policy responses, from the agencies to the tools and measures, the case study reviews and shares lessons from the successful COVID-19 prevention and control in Vietnam that could be useful for other nations.
新冠疫情已成为人类历史上最严重的健康危机之一,自 2020 年 1 月以来迅速在全球蔓延。越南通过及时采取严厉措施,是少数几个在很大程度上成功控制疫情的国家之一。这一结果源于多种因素的和谐结合,而政策体系发挥了关键作用。本研究通过综合评估不同分类的 959 份相关政策文件,评估了 2020 年 1 月疫情爆发初期至 2020 年 7 月 24 日(共确诊 413 例,从当地社区感染到无新增病例 99 天)越南对新冠疫情的政策反应。研究结果表明,越南的政策体系在多个权力层级(从国家到省政府的 33 个不同机构)迅速、主动、有效地做出反应,使用了一系列政策工具和措施。在研究期间,平均每天有 2.24 例新增病例,同时也发布了 5.13 份新政策文件。越南前六个月的疫情政策应对分为四个时期,I 期(1 月 23 日至 3 月 5 日)、II 期(3 月 6 日至 19 日)、III 期(3 月 20 日至 4 月 21 日)和 IV 期(4 月 22 日至 7 月 24 日)。本文总结了这四个抗疫阶段的八个解决方案组,包括疫情公告和指导文件、医疗措施、学校封锁、应急响应、边境和入境管控措施、社会隔离和全国社会隔离措施、金融支持以及其他措施。通过强调政策反应的多样性,从机构到工具和措施,本案例研究回顾并分享了越南成功防控新冠疫情的经验教训,这对其他国家可能具有借鉴意义。