Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Aug;41(8):1912-1923. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20982395. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
The generalization of perfusion-based, anterior circulation large vessel occlusion selection criteria to posterior circulation stroke is not straightforward due to physiologic delay, which we posit produces physiologic prolongation of the posterior circulation perfusion time-to-maximum (Tmax). To assess normative Tmax distributions, patients undergoing CTA/CTP for suspected ischemic stroke between 1/2018-3/2019 were retrospectively identified. Subjects with any cerebrovascular stenoses, or with follow-up MRI or final clinical diagnosis of stroke were excluded. Posterior circulation anatomic variations were identified. CTP were processed in RAPID and segmented in a custom pipeline permitting manually-enforced arterial input function (AIF) and perfusion estimations constrained to pre-specified vascular territories. Seventy-one subjects (mean 64 ± 19 years) met inclusion. Median Tmax was significantly greater in the cerebellar hemispheres (right: 3.0 s, left: 2.9 s) and PCA territories (right: 2.9 s; left: 3.3 s) than in the anterior circulation (right: 2.4 s; left: 2.3 s, p < 0.001). Fetal PCA disposition eliminated ipsilateral PCA Tmax delays (p = 0.012). Median territorial Tmax was significantly lower with basilar versus any anterior circulation AIF for all vascular territories (p < 0.001). Significant baseline delays in posterior circulation Tmax are observed even without steno-occlusive disease and vary with anatomic variation and AIF selection. The potential for overestimation of at-risk volumes in the posterior circulation merits caution in future trials.
由于生理延迟,基于灌注的前循环大血管闭塞选择标准不能直接推广应用于后循环卒中,我们假设这会导致后循环灌注时间至最大值(Tmax)的生理性延长。为了评估正常 Tmax 分布,回顾性地确定了 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间因疑似缺血性卒中而行 CTA/CTP 的患者。排除了有任何脑血管狭窄或有随访 MRI 或最终临床诊断为卒中的患者。识别了后循环解剖变异。CTP 在 RAPID 中进行处理,并在定制的管道中进行分割,允许手动强制动脉输入函数(AIF)和灌注估计,这些估计受到预先指定的血管区域的限制。71 名患者(平均年龄 64 ± 19 岁)符合纳入标准。小脑半球(右侧:3.0s,左侧:2.9s)和 PCA 区域(右侧:2.9s;左侧:3.3s)的 Tmax 中位数显著大于前循环(右侧:2.4s;左侧:2.3s,p<0.001)。胎儿 PCA 位置消除了同侧 PCA Tmax 延迟(p=0.012)。对于所有血管区域,基底动脉 AIF 与任何前循环 AIF 的比较,区域性 Tmax 中位数显著降低(p<0.001)。即使没有狭窄闭塞性疾病,后循环 Tmax 也存在明显的基线延迟,并且与解剖变异和 AIF 选择有关。在后循环中,危险容积的过度估计的可能性在后续试验中需要谨慎对待。