• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑为何以及如何权衡来自多个专家的贡献。

Why and how the brain weights contributions from a mixture of experts.

作者信息

O'Doherty John P, Lee Sang Wan, Tadayonnejad Reza, Cockburn Jeff, Iigaya Kyo, Charpentier Caroline J

机构信息

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA; Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.

Department of Bio and Brain Engineering and Program of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr;123:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.022
PMID:33444700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8040830/
Abstract

It has long been suggested that human behavior reflects the contributions of multiple systems that cooperate or compete for behavioral control. Here we propose that the brain acts as a "Mixture of Experts" in which different expert systems propose strategies for action. It will be argued that the brain determines which experts should control behavior at any one moment in time by keeping track of the reliability of the predictions within each system, and by allocating control over behavior in a manner that depends on the relative reliabilities across experts. fMRI and neurostimulation studies suggest a specific contribution of the anterior prefrontal cortex in this process. Further, such a mechanism also takes into consideration the complexity of the expert, favoring simpler over more cognitively complex experts. Results from the study of different expert systems in both experiential and social learning domains hint at the possibility that this reliability-based control mechanism is domain general, exerting control over many different expert systems simultaneously in order to produce sophisticated behavior.

摘要

长期以来,人们一直认为人类行为反映了多个系统的作用,这些系统相互协作或竞争以控制行为。在此,我们提出大脑充当“专家混合体”,其中不同的专家系统提出行动策略。有人认为,大脑通过跟踪每个系统内预测的可靠性,并以依赖于各专家相对可靠性的方式分配对行为的控制,来决定在任何时刻应由哪些专家控制行为。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和神经刺激研究表明前额叶前部皮质在此过程中具有特定作用。此外,这种机制还考虑了专家的复杂性,更倾向于选择较简单而非认知上更复杂的专家。在经验学习和社会学习领域对不同专家系统的研究结果暗示,这种基于可靠性的控制机制可能具有领域通用性,能够同时对许多不同的专家系统进行控制,从而产生复杂的行为。

相似文献

1
Why and how the brain weights contributions from a mixture of experts.大脑为何以及如何权衡来自多个专家的贡献。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr;123:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Hemispheric activation differences in novice and expert clinicians during clinical decision making.新手和专家临床医生在临床决策过程中的半球激活差异。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Dec;21(5):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9648-3. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
3
Test-retest reliability of fMRI-measured brain activity during decision making under risk.风险决策下 fMRI 测量脑活动的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 1;214:116759. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116759. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
4
Dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex track distinct properties of dynamic social behavior.背外侧前额叶皮质和背内侧前额叶皮质追踪动态社会行为的不同特征。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;15(4):383-393. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa053.
5
Prefrontal brain activity predicts temporally extended decision-making behavior.前额叶大脑活动可预测时间上延伸的决策行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):537-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.121-04.
6
Regional brain changes occurring during disobedience to "experts" in financial decision-making.在金融决策中违抗“专家”时发生的局部脑区变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e87321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087321. eCollection 2014.
7
Cognitive regulation alters social and dietary choice by changing attribute representations in domain-general and domain-specific brain circuits.认知调节通过改变一般领域和特定领域大脑回路中的属性表示来改变社会和饮食选择。
Elife. 2018 May 29;7:e31185. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31185.
8
Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making.基于模型的功能磁共振成像及其在奖励学习与决策中的应用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:35-53. doi: 10.1196/annals.1390.022. Epub 2007 Apr 7.
9
Taking a gamble or playing by the rules: dissociable prefrontal systems implicated in probabilistic versus deterministic rule-based decisions.冒险还是守规:概率性与确定性基于规则决策的分离前额叶系统。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1810-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.030. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
10
Risk-Taking Behavior in a Computerized Driving Task: Brain Activation Correlates of Decision-Making, Outcome, and Peer Influence in Male Adolescents.计算机化驾驶任务中的冒险行为:男性青少年决策、结果和同伴影响的脑激活关联
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 8;10(6):e0129516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129516. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Defending and defining compulsive behaviour in addiction.捍卫并界定成瘾中的强迫行为。
Addict Biol. 2024 Aug;29(8):e13427. doi: 10.1111/adb.13427.
2
Disorders of compulsivity: Deficits in arbitrating learning strategies.强迫障碍:学习策略仲裁的缺陷。
Addict Biol. 2024 Aug;29(8):e13433. doi: 10.1111/adb.13433.
3
Surprise-minimization as a solution to the structural credit assignment problem.将惊喜最小化作为解决结构性信用分配问题的一种方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Humans primarily use model-based inference in the two-stage task.人类主要在两阶段任务中使用基于模型的推理。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):1053-1066. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0905-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Goal-oriented and habitual decisions: Neural signatures of model-based and model-free learning.目标导向和习惯决策:基于模型和无模型学习的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116834. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116834. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
3
A Neuro-computational Account of Arbitration between Choice Imitation and Goal Emulation during Human Observational Learning.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 28;20(5):e1012175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012175. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Heterogeneity in strategy use during arbitration between experiential and observational learning.在经验学习和观察学习之间的仲裁中策略使用的异质性。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 24;15(1):4436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48548-y.
5
Neurocomputational mechanisms involved in adaptation to fluctuating intentions of others.涉及适应他人波动意图的神经计算机制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 12;15(1):3189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47491-2.
6
Neurocomputational model of compulsivity: deviating from an uncertain goal-directed system.强迫行为的神经计算模型:偏离不确定的目标导向系统。
Brain. 2024 Jun 3;147(6):2230-2244. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae102.
7
Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.主动强化学习与动作偏差和滞后的比较:混合专家与非专家的控制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 29;20(3):e1011950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Impairment of arbitration between model-based and model-free reinforcement learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中基于模型和无模型强化学习之间的仲裁受损。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 26;14:1162800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1162800. eCollection 2023.
9
Decision heuristics in contexts integrating action selection and execution.在整合行动选择和执行的情境中进行决策启发式。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;13(1):6486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33008-2.
10
Entropy and Cross-Level Orderliness in Light of the Interconnection between the Neural System and Consciousness.基于神经系统与意识之间的相互联系的熵与跨层次有序性
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;25(3):418. doi: 10.3390/e25030418.
人类观察学习中选择模仿与目标模拟之间的仲裁的神经计算解释。
Neuron. 2020 May 20;106(4):687-699.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Controllability governs the balance between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection.可控性支配着巴甫洛夫式和工具性动作选择之间的平衡。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 20;10(1):5826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13737-7.
5
Task complexity interacts with state-space uncertainty in the arbitration between model-based and model-free learning.任务复杂性与状态空间不确定性相互作用,影响基于模型和无模型学习之间的仲裁。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 16;10(1):5738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13632-1.
6
Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts.局部专家的自适应混合模型
Neural Comput. 1991 Spring;3(1):79-87. doi: 10.1162/neco.1991.3.1.79.
7
Neurostimulation Reveals Context-Dependent Arbitration Between Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning.神经刺激揭示了基于模型和无模型强化学习之间的上下文相关仲裁。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4850-4862. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz019.
8
Behavioural evidence for parallel outcome-sensitive and outcome-insensitive Pavlovian learning systems in humans.人类中平行的结果敏感型和结果不敏感型巴甫洛夫学习系统的行为证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Mar;3(3):284-296. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0527-9. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Causal role of the inferolateral prefrontal cortex in balancing goal-directed and habitual control of behavior.内侧前额叶皮层在平衡目标导向和习惯控制行为中的因果作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27678-6.
10
Heuristic and optimal policy computations in the human brain during sequential decision-making.序列决策过程中人类大脑的启发式和最优策略计算
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 23;9(1):325. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02750-3.